D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Biology and Biochemistry D-index 52 Citations 8,047 174 World Ranking 12214 National Ranking 5212

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • DNA
  • Genome

John M. Hancock mostly deals with Genetics, Gene, Genome, Ribosomal RNA and Peptide sequence. His research brings together the fields of Evolutionary biology and Genetics. His Genome study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as International Knockout Mouse Consortium, Inbred strain, Replication slippage and Expressivity.

He works mostly in the field of Ribosomal RNA, limiting it down to topics relating to Ribosomal DNA and, in certain cases, Internal transcribed spacer, as a part of the same area of interest. The study incorporates disciplines such as Plasma protein binding, Molecular biology, A-site, Binding site and Endoplasmic reticulum in addition to Peptide sequence. His work in Phenotype covers topics such as Computational biology which are related to areas like Data access.

His most cited work include:

  • Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project (446 citations)
  • The MLL recombinome of acute leukemias in 2013 (344 citations)
  • Complete sequences of the rRNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster. (307 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

John M. Hancock mainly focuses on Genetics, Computational biology, Gene, Genome and Phenotype. As part of his studies on Genetics, John M. Hancock frequently links adjacent subjects like Evolutionary biology. His Computational biology course of study focuses on Ontology and World Wide Web.

His study in Gene duplication and Replication slippage falls under the purview of Gene. His research on Genome focuses in particular on Genome evolution. John M. Hancock interconnects RNA and Ribosomal DNA in the investigation of issues within Ribosomal RNA.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Genetics (31.05%)
  • Computational biology (22.11%)
  • Gene (18.42%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Elixir (3.16%)
  • Computational biology (22.11%)
  • Elixir (2.11%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

John M. Hancock mainly investigates Elixir, Computational biology, Elixir, Brassica and Sierra leone. His Elixir research integrates issues from Field, Node and Data science. His study in Field is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Benchmark data, Genomics, Structural bioinformatics and Skills for Life.

His Computational biology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Identifier, Phenomics and Laboratory mouse. His Brassica study incorporates themes from Biotechnology and Crop. His research in Crop intersects with topics in User interface, Data integration, Data management and Data access.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Analysis of mammalian gene function through broad-based phenotypic screens across a consortium of mouse clinics. (110 citations)
  • Disentangling the complexity of low complexity proteins (27 citations)
  • Human Variome Project Quality Assessment Criteria for Variation Databases. (15 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • DNA
  • Genome

His scientific interests lie mostly in Computational biology, Software, Carpentry, Elixir and Molecular Sequence Annotation. John M. Hancock incorporates Computational biology and Structure and function in his studies. His Software research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Bioinformatics software and Data science.

He integrates many fields, such as Carpentry and engineering, in his works. The Elixir study combines topics in areas such as Field, Engineering management and Skills for Life. His Molecular Sequence Annotation research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Domain, Sequence analysis, Annotation, Visualization and Intersection.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project

Chris F. Taylor;Chris F. Taylor;Dawn Field;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Jan Aerts.
Nature Biotechnology (2008)

589 Citations

The MLL recombinome of acute leukemias in 2013

C. Meyer;J. Hofmann;T. Burmeister;D. Gröger.
Leukemia (2013)

498 Citations

Complete sequences of the rRNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Diethard Tautz;John M. Hancock;David A. Webb;Christiane Tautz.
Molecular Biology and Evolution (1988)

421 Citations

A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains

Michelle M Simon;Simon Greenaway;Jacqueline K White;Helmut Fuchs.
Genome Biology (2013)

399 Citations

PlantProm: a database of plant promoter sequences

Ilham A. Shahmuradov;Alex J. Gammerman;John M. Hancock;Peter M. Bramley.
Nucleic Acids Research (2003)

326 Citations

Evolution of the cetacean mitochondrial D-loop region.

A R Hoelzel;J M Hancock;G A Dover.
Molecular Biology and Evolution (1991)

293 Citations

Using ontologies to describe mouse phenotypes

Georgios V Gkoutos;Eain C J Green;Ann-Marie Mallon;John M Hancock.
Genome Biology (2004)

266 Citations

Evolution of the secondary structures and compensatory mutations of the ribosomal RNAs of Drosophila melanogaster.

John M. Hancock;Diethard Tautz;Gabriel A. Dover.
Molecular Biology and Evolution (1988)

241 Citations

The contribution of slippage-like processes to genome evolution.

John M. Hancock.
Journal of Molecular Evolution (1995)

212 Citations

Post-publication sharing of data and tools

Paul N Schofield;Tania Bubela;Thomas A Weaver;Lili Portilla.
Nature (2009)

168 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing John M. Hancock

Robert Hoehndorf

Robert Hoehndorf

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

Publications: 82

Georgios V. Gkoutos

Georgios V. Gkoutos

University of Birmingham

Publications: 75

Paul N. Schofield

Paul N. Schofield

University of Cambridge

Publications: 59

Christopher J. Mungall

Christopher J. Mungall

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Publications: 36

Helen Parkinson

Helen Parkinson

European Bioinformatics Institute

Publications: 31

Rolf Marschalek

Rolf Marschalek

Goethe University Frankfurt

Publications: 29

Damian Smedley

Damian Smedley

Queen Mary University of London

Publications: 29

Melissa A. Haendel

Melissa A. Haendel

Oregon Health & Science University

Publications: 28

Susanna-Assunta Sansone

Susanna-Assunta Sansone

University of Oxford

Publications: 28

Philippe Rocca-Serra

Philippe Rocca-Serra

University of Oxford

Publications: 25

Peter N. Robinson

Peter N. Robinson

University of Connecticut

Publications: 25

Steve D.M. Brown

Steve D.M. Brown

Medical Research Council

Publications: 24

Yann Herault

Yann Herault

Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology

Publications: 23

Alfried P. Vogler

Alfried P. Vogler

Imperial College London

Publications: 23

Valerie Gailus-Durner

Valerie Gailus-Durner

Helmholtz Zentrum München

Publications: 22

Dawn Field

Dawn Field

University of Oxford

Publications: 21

Trending Scientists

Keith E. Maskus

Keith E. Maskus

University of Colorado Boulder

Walmir Freitas

Walmir Freitas

State University of Campinas

William R. Dichtel

William R. Dichtel

Northwestern University

Folke Tjerneld

Folke Tjerneld

Lund University

Shengli Chen

Shengli Chen

Wuhan University

Floriana Tuna

Floriana Tuna

University of Manchester

Philip S. Perlman

Philip S. Perlman

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Laurence J. Zwiebel

Laurence J. Zwiebel

Vanderbilt University

Myriam Witvrouw

Myriam Witvrouw

KU Leuven

Thomas Birner

Thomas Birner

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Alberto Viglione

Alberto Viglione

Polytechnic University of Turin

Ying Zhao

Ying Zhao

Ludong University

Martha U. Gillette

Martha U. Gillette

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Anthony Nash

Anthony Nash

University of Edinburgh

Lawrence J. Whalley

Lawrence J. Whalley

University of Aberdeen

Amy L. Ai

Amy L. Ai

Florida State University

Something went wrong. Please try again later.