World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert-Jan van Geuns

Robert-Jan van Geuns

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
36700
World Ranking
10778
National Ranking
424

Robert-Jan van Geuns publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert-Jan van Geuns sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 545 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert-Jan van Geuns D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert-Jan van Geuns sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert-Jan van Geuns is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with a specific emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's work spans various subfields, including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and emergency medicine.

Main topics covered in their research include coronary interventions and diagnostics, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, antiplatelet therapy and cardiovascular diseases, acute myocardial infarction research, lipoproteins and cardiovascular health, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, and mechanical circulatory support devices.

Robert-Jan van Geuns frequently publishes in several journals, notably:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • EuroIntervention
  • Netherlands Heart Journal
  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine

Their recent publications demonstrate contributions to cardiovascular research with these papers:

  • "Effect of Alirocumab Added to High-Intensity Statin Therapy on Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction" (2022), published in JAMA
  • "Five-year outcomes after state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three-vessel disease: final results of the SYNTAX II study" (2021), published in European Heart Journal
  • "Drug-coated balloon angioplasty with rescue stenting versus intended stenting for the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions (REC-CAGEFREE I): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial" (2024), published in The Lancet
  • "Concomitant Coronary Atheroma Regression and Stabilization in Response to Lipid-Lowering Therapy" (2023), published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Rule-out of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome by a single, pre-hospital troponin measurement: a randomized trial" (2023), published in European Heart Journal

The scientist collaborates with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Niels van Royen
  • Peter Damman
  • Yoshinobu Onuma
  • Patrick W. Serruys
  • Scot Garg

Best Publications

  • 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).

    Stephan Windecker;Philippe Kolh;Fernando Alfonso;Jean-Philippe Collet

  • Images in Cardiovascular Medicine

    C.S. Breburda;Robert Jan van Geuns;Jos Bekkers;Maarten Janssen

  • Comprehensive Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses : Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography and Correlation With Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina

    W. Bob Meijboom;Carlos A.G. Van Mieghem;Niels van Pelt;Annick Weustink

  • Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Stephan Windecker;Patrick Serruys;Simon Wandel;Pawel Buszman

  • Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial

    Pascal Vranckx;Marco Valgimigli;Peter Jüni;Christian Hamm

  • Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents

    Patrick W Serruys;Sigmund Silber;Scot Garg;Robert Jan van Geuns

  • Evaluation of the Second Generation of a Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes

    Patrick W. Serruys;Yoshinobu Onuma;Dariusz Dudek;Pieter C. Smits

  • Catheter-based intramyocardial injection of autologous skeletal myoblasts as a primary treatment of ischemic heart failure: clinical experience with six-month follow-up.

    Pieter C Smits;Robert-Jan M van Geuns;Don Poldermans;Manolis Bountioukos

  • Evaluation of the Accuracy of Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in the Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

    Jan-Peter Smedema;Gabriel Snoep;Marinus P.G. van Kroonenburgh;Robert-Jan van Geuns

  • Everolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (EXAMINATION): 1 year results of a randomised controlled trial

    Manel Sabate;Angel Cequier;Andrés Iñiguez;Antonio Serra

  • Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease

    Koen Nieman;Benno J. Rensing;Robert-Jan M. van Geuns;Arie Munne

  • In vivo detection of high-risk coronary plaques by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound and cardiovascular outcome: results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study.

    Jin M. Cheng;Hector M. Garcia-Garcia;Sanneke P.M. de Boer;Isabella Kardys

  • First experience in humans using adipose tissue-derived regenerative cells in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

    Jaco H. Houtgraaf;Wijnand K. den Dekker;Bas M. van Dalen;Tirza Springeling

  • Prognostic Value of Microvascular Obstruction and Infarct Size, as Measured by CMR in STEMI Patients

    Matthijs van Kranenburg;Michael Magro;Holger Thiele;Suzanne de Waha

  • An optical coherence tomography study of a biodegradable vs. durable polymer-coated limus-eluting stent: a LEADERS trial sub-study

    Peter Barlis;Evelyn Regar;Patrick W. Serruys;Konstantinos Dimopoulos

  • Dynamics of vessel wall changes following the implantation of the absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months.

    Patrick W. Serruys;Yoshinobu Onuma;Hector M. Garcia-Garcia;Takashi Muramatsu

  • Evaluation of left ventricular function three years after percutaneous recanalization of chronic total coronary occlusions.

    Sharon W. Kirschbaum;Timo Baks;Martin van den Ent;George Sianos

  • Histopathology of Embolic Debris Captured During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    Nicolas M. Van Mieghem;Marguerite E.I. Schipper;Elena Ladich;Elham Faqiri

  • Fractional Flow Reserve Computed from Noninvasive CT Angiography Data: Diagnostic Performance of an On-Site Clinician-operated Computational Fluid Dynamics Algorithm

    Adriaan Coenen;Marisa M Lubbers;Akira Kurata;Atsushi Kono

  • Evaluation of Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: CT Angiographic Assessment of Grafts and Coronary Arteries

    Koen Nieman;Peter M. T. Pattynama;Benno J. Rensing;Robert-Jan M. van Geuns

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Evelyn Regar
Evelyn Regar University of Zurich
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Yoshinobu Onuma
Yoshinobu Onuma University of Galway
Stephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker University of Bern
Peter de Jaegere
Peter de Jaegere Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Pim J. de Feyter
Pim J. de Feyter Erasmus University Rotterdam
Peter Jüni
Peter Jüni University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine isn’t limited to traditional medical degrees. Many students opt for online nursing and healthcare programs to build strong career foundations or advance their qualifications. If you’re looking for flexibility and affordability, accredited online options provide a range of pathways from entry-level roles to advanced practice and research.

Registered nurses seeking to expand their opportunities can consider the rn to bsn cheapest programs, which help boost clinical skills and earning potential. Prospective nurse practitioners may be interested in the cheapest fnp programs online to become family nurse practitioners—a vital role in primary care.

Those at the beginning stage can explore cheapest online nursing programs for accessible entry into the nursing profession. For leadership or academic careers, online phd nursing programs offer a path to research and teaching positions.

As healthcare evolves, online degrees make it easier than ever to access specialized education and fuel career advancement, wherever you are.

Best Scientists Citing Robert-Jan van Geuns

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles