World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
72
Citations
28134
World Ranking
19761
National Ranking
1773

Caroline J. Doré publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline J. Doré sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 223 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Caroline J. Doré D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline J. Doré sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Caroline J. Doré is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their primary field of research is Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Epidemiology, and Surgery. The research portfolio reflects a diverse engagement across these disciplines, highlighting an interdisciplinary approach.

The main topics of Caroline J. Doré's work include:

  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

The scientist has contributed several recent papers spanning multiple medical specialties. Notable publications include:

  • "Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis" (2020), Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • "Effect of Corneal Cross-linking versus Standard Care on Keratoconus Progression in Young Patients" (2021), Ophthalmology
  • "Total Ankle Replacement Versus Arthrodesis for End-Stage Ankle Osteoarthritis" (2022), Annals of Internal Medicine
  • "Risk Factors for Visual Field Deterioration in the United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study" (2020), Ophthalmology
  • "Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Versus Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery (FACT)" (2020), Ophthalmology

Frequent collaborators have included Kashfia Chowdhury, Catey Bunce, Jennifer Burr, Emilia Caverly, and Kate Bennett. These co-authors have contributed robustly across research projects, signifying active teamwork in the scientist's academic endeavors.

Caroline J. Doré's work has been published frequently in respected venues such as Ophthalmology, Trials, and Health Technology Assessment, among others. These journals represent consistent contributions to both clinical and research-focused aspects of medicine.

Best Publications

  • Spirit 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials

    An Wen Chan;Jennifer M. Tetzlaff;Douglas G. Altman;Andreas Laupacis

  • Shear-wave Elastography Improves the Specificity of Breast US: The BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses

    Wendie A. Berg;David O. Cosgrove;Caroline J Doré;Fritz K. W. Schäfer

  • Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials.

    D.G. Altman;C.J. Doré

  • Leg ulcers: Epidemiology and aetiology

    Julia V. Cornwall;Caroline J. Doré;J. D. Lewis

  • Glycaemic index as a determinant of serum HDL-cholesterol concentration

    G Frost;AA Leeds;CJ Doré;S Madeiros

  • Shear Wave Elastography for Breast Masses Is Highly Reproducible

    David O. Cosgrove;David O. Cosgrove;Wendie A. Berg;Caroline J Doré;Danny M. Skyba

  • Hepatic triglyceride content and its relation to body adiposity: a magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study

    E L Thomas;G Hamilton;N Patel;R O’Dwyer

  • Rivaroxaban versus warfarin to treat patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (RAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2/3, non-inferiority trial

    Hannah Cohen;Hannah Cohen;Beverley J Hunt;Maria Efthymiou;Deepa R J Arachchillage

  • Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials.

    Carrol Gamble;Ashma Krishan;Deborah Stocken;Deborah Stocken;Steff Lewis

  • The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies

    Brennan C Kahan;Vipul Jairath;Caroline J Doré;Tim P Morris

  • Increase in Mallampati score during pregnancy

    S. Pilkington;F. Carli;M.J. Dakin;M. Romney

  • Randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of low-dose oral methotrexate in children with extended oligoarticular or systemic arthritis.

    P. Woo;T. R. Southwood;A.-M. Prieur;C. J. Doré

  • Bactericidal and sterilizing activities of antituberculosis drugs during the first 14 days.

    Amina Jindani;Caroline J. Doré;Denis A. Mitchison

  • Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular risk stratification

    Andrew N Nicolaides;Stavros K Kakkos;Efthyvoulos Kyriacou;Maura Griffin

  • Altered adiposity after extremely preterm birth.

    Sabita N. Uthaya;E. Louise Thomas;Gavin Hamilton;Caroline J. Doré

  • Criteria for Estimating Likelihood of Difficulty of Endotracheal Intubation with the Macintosh Laryngoscope

    C. P. Bellhouse;C. Dore

  • A 6-month randomized trial of thyroxine treatment in women with mild subclinical hypothyroidism.

    Wing May Kong;Maleyca H Sheikh;Peter J Lumb;Peter J Lumb;Danielle B Freedman

  • Accidental hypothermia and impaired temperature homoeostasis in the elderly.

    K J Collins;C Dore;A N Exton-Smith;R H Fox

  • Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies.

    Kerry N L Avery;Paula R. Williamson;Carrol Gamble;Elaine O Connell Francischetto

  • G-CSF and GM-CSF for treating or preventing neonatal infections.

    Robert Carr;Neena Modi;Caroline J Doré

Frequent Co-Authors

Catey Bunce
Catey Bunce King's College London
Andrew N. Nicolaides
Andrew N. Nicolaides Imperial College London
Michael F. Murphy
Michael F. Murphy NHS Blood and Transplant
David A. Isenberg
David A. Isenberg University College London
Jimmy D. Bell
Jimmy D. Bell University of Westminster
Roxy Senior
Roxy Senior National Health Service
Douglas G. Altman
Douglas G. Altman University of Oxford
Nigel K. Arden
Nigel K. Arden University of Oxford
Michael R. Ehrenstein
Michael R. Ehrenstein University College London
Isobel Heyman
Isobel Heyman University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degrees and pathways can open doors to rewarding roles beyond traditional medical school. For students considering cost-effective routes, there are cheapest online mha programs that prepare graduates for influential roles in healthcare management and administration.

Nursing professionals aiming for advanced practice or leadership roles may benefit from the least expensive dnp programs, which offer flexible, accredited pathways to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

Pharmacy is another critical field in healthcare, and options exist for those looking for pharmacy school online accredited by leading organizations. This provides remote learners with access to recognized pharmacy degrees.

For tech-savvy students interested in data and systems, the growth in health informatics has created new opportunities to shape the future of medical record-keeping and analytics. These pathways offer diverse career options in the dynamic healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Caroline J. Doré

Trending Scientists