World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
30707
World Ranking
9753
National Ranking
948

Catey Bunce publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catey Bunce sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 547 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Catey Bunce D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catey Bunce sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catey Bunce is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Ophthalmology. Bunce's work spans various subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics of Bunce's research include:

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions

Bunce has contributed to a number of scientific journals with frequent publications in:

  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Eye
  • Ophthalmology
  • JAMA Ophthalmology
  • BMJ Open

Among recent papers are:

  • "World leaders' usage of Twitter in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a content analysis," 2020, Journal of Public Health
  • "Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (LiGHT) Trial," 2022, Ophthalmology
  • "Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgical Techniques for Open-Angle Glaucoma," 2021, JAMA Ophthalmology
  • "Effect of Corneal Cross-linking versus Standard Care on Keratoconus Progression in Young Patients," 2021, Ophthalmology
  • "Recent trends in vision impairment certifications in England and Wales," 2020, Eye

Bunce has collaborated frequently with other researchers including:

  • David F. Garway-Heath
  • Pearse A. Keane
  • Praveen J. Patel
  • Alexander Day
  • Gus Gazzard

Best Publications

  • A prospective randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy in the management of diabetic macular edema (BOLT study) 12-month data: report 2

    Michel Michaelides;Michel Michaelides;Andrew Kaines;Robin D Hamilton;Samantha Fraser-Bell

  • Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial

    David F Garway-Heath;David P Crabb;Catey Bunce;Gerassimos Lascaratos

  • A comparison of the causes of blindness certifications in England and Wales in working age adults (16–64 years), 1999–2000 with 2009–2010

    Gerald Liew;Michel Michaelides;Michel Michaelides;Catey Bunce

  • A 2-Year Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravitreal Bevacizumab or Laser Therapy (BOLT) in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema: 24-Month Data: Report 3

    Ranjan Rajendram;Samantha Fraser-Bell;Andrew Kaines;Michel Michaelides

  • Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus.

    Stephanie L. Watson;Andrew Ramsay;John K.G. Dart;Catey Bunce

  • Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Gus Gazzard;Gus Gazzard;Evgenia Konstantakopoulou;Evgenia Konstantakopoulou;David Garway-Heath;David Garway-Heath;Anurag Garg;Anurag Garg

  • The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry

    PA Tonnu;T Ho;T Newson;A El Sheikh

  • Long-term outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral fixated sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

    Brendan J. Vote;Paris Tranos;Catey Bunce;David G. Charteris

  • Leading causes of certification for blindness and partial sight in England & Wales

    Catey Bunce;Richard Wormald

  • Phenotypic subtypes of Stargardt macular dystrophy-fundus flavimaculatus.

    Noemi Lois;Graham E. Holder;Catey Bunce;Fredrick W. Fitzke

  • Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and heparin prevents proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Results from a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial

    Riaz Hassan Yusuf Asaria;Chee Hing Kon;Catey Bunce;David G Charteris

  • Bevacizumab for neovascular age related macular degeneration (ABC Trial): multicentre randomised double masked study

    Adnan Tufail;Praveen J Patel;Catherine Egan;Philip Hykin

  • Quality of vision and graft thickness in deep anterior lamellar and penetrating corneal allografts.

    Navid Ardjomand;Navid Ardjomand;Scott Hau;James C. McAlister;Catey Bunce

  • World leaders' usage of Twitter in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a content analysis.

    Sohaib R Rufai;Sohaib R Rufai;Catey Bunce

  • How Effective is Low Vision Service Provision? A Systematic Review

    Alison M. Binns;Catey Bunce;Chris Dickinson;Robert Harper

  • A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.

    Tonnu Pa;Ho T;Sharma K;White E

  • Cystic bleb formation and related complications in limbus- versus fornix-based conjunctival flaps in pediatric and young adult trabeculectomy with mitomycin C.

    Anthony P Wells;M.Francesca Cordeiro;Catey Bunce;Peng T Khaw

  • Histological features of ocular adnexal lymphoma (REAL classification) and their association with patient morbidity and survival

    Christopher Jenkins;Geoffrey E Rose;Catey Bunce;John E Wright

  • Prevalence and Main Outcomes of Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    E. Jauniaux;C. Bunce;L. Grønbeck;J. Langhoff-Roos

  • The Relationships of Age Changes in Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Bruch's Membrane

    A Okubo;R H Rosa;Catey Bunce;R A Alexander

Frequent Co-Authors

Peng T. Khaw
Peng T. Khaw University College London
Gary S. Rubin
Gary S. Rubin University College London
Nick Freemantle
Nick Freemantle University College London
Andrew R. Webster
Andrew R. Webster University College London
Alan C. Bird
Alan C. Bird University College London
Anthony T. Moore
Anthony T. Moore University of California, San Francisco
John R.W. Yates
John R.W. Yates University of Cambridge
Paul J. Foster
Paul J. Foster University College London
Susan Lightman
Susan Lightman University College London
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Jeremy M. Grimshaw Ottawa Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA isn’t limited to the path of becoming a physician. There are a variety of related degrees and career pathways available online that can help you enter the healthcare field more quickly and affordably.

If you're interested in pharmaceuticals, consider exploring a pharmacy degree online to gain advanced knowledge on medications, therapies, and patient care. For those fascinated by data and technology in healthcare, a career in health informatics offers a blend of IT and medical expertise, focusing on managing patient data and healthcare systems.

Looking for quick entry into healthcare? A low cost medical coding and billing online program can prepare you for in-demand administrative roles, which are critical to hospital and clinic operations. Alternatively, registered nurses aiming to advance their careers might choose one of the cheapest fnp programs available online to become a Family Nurse Practitioner.

These online medical degrees offer flexible, cost-effective pathways into rewarding healthcare careers beyond traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Catey Bunce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles