World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
26663
World Ranking
15556
National Ranking
1431

Gary S. Rubin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary S. Rubin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 355 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gary S. Rubin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary S. Rubin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary S. Rubin is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant specialization in Ophthalmology. The body of work spans various subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The main research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders

Gary S. Rubin has coauthored multiple works with frequent collaborators such as:

  • David P. Crabb
  • Jan Henrik Terheyden
  • Matthias Schmid
  • Robert P. Finger
  • Frank G. Holz

The scientist has published extensively in several venues, with recurring contributions to:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Ophthalmology Retina

Among their recent papers are:

  • Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (LiGHT) Trial, 2022, Ophthalmology
  • Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce, 2020, Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • Visual Field Outcomes from the Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial (LiGHT), 2020, Ophthalmology
  • Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Versus Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery (FACT), 2020, Ophthalmology
  • Clinical study protocol for a low-interventional study in intermediate age-related macular degeneration developing novel clinical endpoints for interventional clinical trials with a regulatory and patient access intention-MACUSTAR, 2020, Trials

Best Publications

  • Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis.

    James W B Bainbridge;Alexander J Smith;Susie S Barker;Scott Robbie

  • Falls and Fear of Falling: Which Comes First? A Longitudinal Prediction Model Suggests Strategies for Primary and Secondary Prevention

    Susan M. Friedman;Beatriz Munoz;Sheila K. West;Gary S. Rubin

  • Long-Term Effect of Gene Therapy on Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis

    James W B Bainbridge;James W B Bainbridge;Manjit S Mehat;Venki Sundaram;Scott J Robbie

  • Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans: The salisbury eye evaluation study

    Beatriz Muñoz;Sheila K. West;Gary S. Rubin;Oliver D. Schein

  • Psychophysics of reading--II. Low vision.

    Gordon E. Legge;Gary S. Rubin;Denis G. Pelli;Mary M. Schleske

  • How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project

    Sheila K. West;Gary S. Rubin;Aimee T. Broman;Beatriz Muñoz

  • Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults. The SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

    S K West;B Munoz;G S Rubin;O D Schein

  • Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Gus Gazzard;Gus Gazzard;Evgenia Konstantakopoulou;Evgenia Konstantakopoulou;David Garway-Heath;David Garway-Heath;Anurag Garg;Anurag Garg

  • Fixation patterns and reading rates in eyes with central scotomas from advanced atrophic age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt disease.

    Janet S. Sunness;Carol A. Applegate;David Haselwood;Gary S. Rubin

  • Visual Function Abnormalities and Prognosis in Eyes with Age-related Geographic Atrophy of the Macula and Good Visual Acuity

    Janet S. Sunness;Gary S. Rubin;Carol A. Applegate;Neil M. Bressler

  • Psychophysics of reading--V. The role of contrast in normal vision.

    Gordon E. Legge;Gary S. Rubin;Andrew Luebker

  • A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. The SEE Study. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project.

    Gary S. Rubin;Sheila K. West;Beatriz Muñoz;Karen Bandeen-Roche

  • VISUAL IMPAIRMENT AND DISABILITY IN OLDER ADULTS

    Gary S. Rubin;Karen Bandeen Roche;Patty Prasada-Rao;Linda P. Fried

  • The association of multiple visual impairments with self-reported visual disability: SEE project.

    Gary S. Rubin;Karen Bandeen-Roche;Guan-Hua Huang;Beatriz Munoz

  • Sunlight Exposure and Risk of Lens Opacities in a Population-Based Study The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project

    Sheila K. West;Donald D. Duncan;Beatriz Muñoz;Gary S. Rubin

  • Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease.

    Michael D. Crossland;Michael D. Crossland;Louise E. Culham;Louise E. Culham;Stamatina A. Kabanarou;Gary S. Rubin;Gary S. Rubin

  • A prospective, population-based study of the role of visual impairment in motor vehicle crashes among older drivers: the SEE study.

    Gary S. Rubin;Edmond S. W. Ng;Karen Bandeen-Roche;Penelope M. Keyl

  • Preclinical Disability Hypotheses About the Bottom of the Iceberg

    Linda P. Fried;Susan J. Herdman;Kris E. Kuhn;Gary Rubin

  • Fixation stability and reading speed in patients with newly developed macular disease.

    Michael D. Crossland;Louise E. Culham;Gary S. Rubin

  • Visual Field Loss Increases the Risk of Falls in Older Adults: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation

    Ellen E. Freeman;Beatriz Muñoz;Gary Rubin;Sheila K. West

Frequent Co-Authors

Sheila K. West
Sheila K. West University of Pennsylvania
Catey Bunce
Catey Bunce King's College London
Linda P. Fried
Linda P. Fried Columbia University
Beatriz Munoz
Beatriz Munoz Johns Hopkins University
Robin R. Ali
Robin R. Ali King's College London
Oliver D. Schein
Oliver D. Schein Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Anthony T. Moore
Anthony T. Moore University of California, San Francisco
Fred W. Fitzke
Fred W. Fitzke University College London
Antony B. Morland
Antony B. Morland University of York
Andrew R. Webster
Andrew R. Webster University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to numerous healthcare careers—even beyond becoming a licensed physician. Many students begin their journey with specialized certifications or associate degrees that provide quick entry into the workforce and strong stepping stones for further study.

For those interested in administrative roles, earning a financial aid for medical billing and coding certification online offers a flexible path to start working in healthcare settings without extensive prerequisites. If patient care is your passion, there are nursing school that does not require teas test, making nursing more accessible for those looking to avoid additional standardized testing.

Aspiring leaders might consider a healthcare administration online degree, offering fast-tracked bachelor’s or master’s programs that lead to management opportunities. Nurses with an associate degree may pursue advanced practice roles through adn to np bridge programs, allowing registered nurses to earn a master’s and become nurse practitioners online.

These alternative pathways provide flexible, accredited options for students at all stages, supporting a dynamic healthcare workforce in the US.

Best Scientists Citing Gary S. Rubin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles