World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Fred W. Fitzke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred W. Fitzke sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Fred W. Fitzke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred W. Fitzke sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fred W. Fitzke is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. The scope of their documented academic work and contributions centers around research conducted within this institution.

There are no records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues linked to this researcher. Likewise, there is no data available on book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work associated with their research.

Available information does not include any awards or honors received by Fred W. Fitzke.

The absence of detailed publication or collaboration data suggests that either such information has not been publicly documented or that their academic footprint is limited in currently accessible sources.

Best Publications

  • Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis.

    James W B Bainbridge;Alexander J Smith;Susie S Barker;Scott Robbie

  • Long-Term Effect of Gene Therapy on Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis

    James W B Bainbridge;James W B Bainbridge;Manjit S Mehat;Venki Sundaram;Scott J Robbie

  • Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes

    David F Garway-Heath;Darmalingum Poinoosawmy;Frederick W Fitzke;Roger A Hitchings

  • Distribution of fundus autofluorescence with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

    A von Rückmann;F W Fitzke;A C Bird

  • Mutations in the human retinal degeneration slow (RDS) gene can cause either retinitis pigmentosa or macular dystrophy.

    John Wells;John Wroblewski;Jeffrey Keen;Christopher Inglehearn

  • Targeting amyloid-β in glaucoma treatment

    Li Guo;Thomas E. Salt;Vy Luong;Nicholas Wood

  • Retinal Ganglion Cell Apoptosis in Glaucoma Is Related to Intraocular Pressure and IOP-Induced Effects on Extracellular Matrix

    Li Guo;Stephen E. Moss;Robert A. Alexander;Robin R. Ali

  • TRANSVERSAL AND LONGITUDINAL IMAGES FROM THE RETINA OF THE LIVING EYE USING LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETRY

    Adrian Gh. Podoleanu;Mauritius Seeger;George M. Dobre;David J. Webb

  • Fundus autofluorescence in age-related macular disease imaged with a laser scanning ophthalmoscope.

    A von Rückmann;F W Fitzke;A C Bird

  • Real-time imaging of single nerve cell apoptosis in retinal neurodegeneration

    M. Francesca Cordeiro;Li Guo;Vy Luong;Glen Harding

  • Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers.

    David F. Garway-Heath;Joseph Caprioli;Fred W. Fitzke;Roger A. Hitchings

  • Refractive index of the human corneal epithelium and stroma.

    Sudi Patel;John Marshall;Frederick W Fitzke

  • Relationship between Electrophysiological, Psychophysical, and Anatomical Measurements in Glaucoma

    David F. Garway-Heath;Graham E. Holder;Fred W. Fitzke;Roger A. Hitchings

  • Classification of fundus autofluorescence patterns in early age-related macular disease.

    Almut Bindewald;Alan C. Bird;Samantha S. Dandekar;Joanna Dolar-Szczasny

  • How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements

    Daniel A. Rosser;Daniel A. Rosser;Simon N. Cousens;Ian E. Murdoch;Ian E. Murdoch;Fred W. Fitzke

  • Variation of nerve fibre layer thickness measurements with age and ethnicity by scanning laser polarimetry

    D Poinoosawmy;L Fontana;J X Wu;F W Fitzke

  • Symptomatic abnormalities of dark adaptation in patients with age-related Bruch's membrane change.

    R L Steinmetz;R Haimovici;C Jubb;F W Fitzke

  • Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma

    F W Fitzke;R A Hitchings;D Poinoosawmy;A I McNaught

  • The Drusenlike Phenotype in Aging Ccl2-Knockout Mice Is Caused by an Accelerated Accumulation of Swollen Autofluorescent Subretinal Macrophages

    Ulrich F O Luhmann;Scott Robbie;Peter M G Munro;Susie E Barker

  • Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification

    D F Garway-Heath;A R Rudnicka;T Lowe;P J Foster

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan C. Bird
Alan C. Bird University College London
Graham E. Holder
Graham E. Holder University College London
Andrew R. Webster
Andrew R. Webster University College London
Anthony T. Moore
Anthony T. Moore University of California, San Francisco
Stephen E. Moss
Stephen E. Moss University College London
Gary S. Rubin
Gary S. Rubin University College London
Shomi S. Bhattacharya
Shomi S. Bhattacharya University College London
Robin R. Ali
Robin R. Ali King's College London
Adrian Gh. Podoleanu
Adrian Gh. Podoleanu University of Kent
Thomas E. Salt
Thomas E. Salt University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to many specialized career paths in the health sciences. Thanks to advancements in digital learning, many of these pathways are now accessible through accredited online programs across the USA.

Students interested in clinical nutrition or public health can consider an online master's degree in nutrition. This degree is ideal for those seeking advanced expertise in the science of food, wellness, and metabolism. For aspiring registered dietitians, exploring registered dietitian masters programs can lead to rewarding careers supporting individual and community health.

For those drawn to medical imaging, accredited ultrasound tech certification online programs provide a flexible route to this in-demand profession. Similarly, rad tech online programs offer a convenient option for entering radiology technology, a field with strong job prospects in hospitals and outpatient centers.

Whether your interests lie in nutrition, diagnostics, or imaging, these online degrees present flexible, affordable pathways to a successful career connected to your studies in Biology and Biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Fred W. Fitzke