World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
38034
World Ranking
7666
National Ranking
751

Peng T. Khaw publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peng T. Khaw sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 633 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peng T. Khaw D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peng T. Khaw sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peng T. Khaw is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses predominantly on the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Ophthalmology and related subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, as well as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's main research topics cover a diverse range of eye-related conditions and technologies. These include:

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies

Peng T. Khaw has contributed to several recent publications that span top-tier journals in global health, genetics, and medicine. Selected recent papers include:

  • The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020 (2021) published in The Lancet Global Health
  • A foundation model for generalizable disease detection from retinal images (2023) published in Nature
  • Multitrait analysis of glaucoma identifies new risk loci and enables polygenic prediction of disease susceptibility and progression (2020) published in Nature Genetics
  • Meta-analysis of 542,934 subjects of European ancestry identifies new genes and mechanisms predisposing to refractive error and myopia (2020) published in Nature Genetics
  • Predicting conversion to wet age-related macular degeneration using deep learning (2020) published in Nature Medicine

Their collaborative work involves frequent coauthors such as Paul J. Foster, Anthony P. Khawaja, Praveen J. Patel, Sharon Chua, and Sobha Sivaprasad. These collaborators appear regularly alongside Peng T. Khaw in publications.

The scientist's work is often published in prominent ophthalmology and vision science journals. Regular publication venues include:

  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Ophthalmology
  • Eye
  • PLoS Genetics

Best Publications

  • Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease

    Jeffrey De Fauw;Joseph R. Ledsam;Bernardino Romera-Paredes;Stanislav Nikolov

  • Primary open-angle glaucoma.

    Robert N Weinreb;Peng Tee Khaw

  • The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020.

    Matthew J Burton;Matthew J Burton;Jacqueline Ramke;Jacqueline Ramke;Ana Patricia Marques;Rupert R A Bourne;Rupert R A Bourne

  • The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district.

    Paul J. Foster;Francis T. S. Oen;David Machin;Tze-Pin Ng

  • Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan District, Guangzhou.

    Mingguang He;Mingguang He;Paul J Foster;Paul J Foster;Jian Ge;Wenyong Huang

  • "Cyclodiode". Trans-scleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of advanced refractory glaucoma.

    Philip A. Bloom;James C. Tsai;Kamal Sharma;Michael H. Miller

  • Transplantation of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial stem cells: a review of techniques and clinical results.

    Alex J. Shortt;Genevieve A. Secker;Maria D. Notara;G. Astrid Limb

  • Prolonged localized tissue effects from 5-minute exposures to fluorouracil and mitomycin C.

    P T Khaw;J W Doyle;M B Sherwood;I Grierson

  • Polyvalent dendrimer glucosamine conjugates prevent scar tissue formation

    Sunil Shaunak;Sharyn Thomas;Elisabetta Gianasi;Antony Godwin

  • In vitro characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human Müller cell line (MIO-M1).

    G. Astrid Limb;Thomas E. Salt;Peter M. G. Munro;Stephen E. Moss

  • Five-Minute Treatments With Fluorouracil, Floxuridine, and Mitomycin Have Long-term Effects on Human Tenon's Capsule Fibroblasts

    Peng T. Khaw;Mark B. Sherwood;Sally L. D. MacKay;Michael J. Rossi

  • Characterization of the limbal epithelial stem cell niche: novel imaging techniques permit in vivo observation and targeted biopsy of limbal epithelial stem cells.

    Alex J. Shortt;Alex J. Shortt;Genevieve A. Secker;Peter M. Munro;Peng T. Khaw;Peng T. Khaw

  • The British Infantile and Childhood Glaucoma (BIG) Eye Study

    Maria Papadopoulos;Noriko Cable;Jugnoo Rahi;Jugnoo Rahi;Jugnoo Rahi;Peng Tee Khaw;Peng Tee Khaw

  • MIO‐M1 Cells and Similar Müller Glial Cell Lines Derived from Adult Human Retina Exhibit Neural Stem Cell Characteristics

    Jean M. Lawrence;Shweta Singhal;Bhairavi Bhatia;David J. Keegan

  • Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and heparin prevents proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Results from a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial

    Riaz Hassan Yusuf Asaria;Chee Hing Kon;Catey Bunce;David G Charteris

  • Evaluation of Anti-TGF-β2 Antibody as a New Postoperative Anti-scarring Agent in Glaucoma Surgery

    Anna L. Mead;Tina T. L. Wong;M. Francesca Cordeiro;Ian K. Anderson

  • Human anti-transforming growth factor-beta2 antibody: a new glaucoma anti-scarring agent.

    M F Cordeiro;P T Khaw

  • Corneal stem cells in review

    Julie T. Daniels;John K. G. Dart;Stephen J. Tuft;Peng T. Khaw

  • Genome-wide analyses identify 68 new loci associated with intraocular pressure and improve risk prediction for primary open-angle glaucoma.

    Anthony P Khawaja;Anthony P Khawaja;Jessica N Cooke Bailey;Nicholas J Wareham;Robert A Scott

  • A phase III study of subconjunctival human anti-transforming growth factor beta(2) monoclonal antibody (CAT-152) to prevent scarring after first-time trabeculectomy.

    Peng Khaw;Franz Grehn;Gábor Holló

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul J. Foster
Paul J. Foster University College London
Catey Bunce
Catey Bunce King's College London
Gregory S. Schultz
Gregory S. Schultz University of Florida
Mingguang He
Mingguang He Sun Yat-sen University
Jane C. Sowden
Jane C. Sowden University College London
Andrew D. Dick
Andrew D. Dick University of Bristol
Tin Aung
Tin Aung National University of Singapore
Clare Gilbert
Clare Gilbert London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Pirro G. Hysi
Pirro G. Hysi King's College London
Shomi S. Bhattacharya
Shomi S. Bhattacharya University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of related fields and online degree options that support career growth in healthcare. For students interested in patient care but looking for alternative pathways, nursing offers several accessible entry points. There are a variety of easiest rn program to get into, providing more opportunities for those aspiring to become registered nurses.

Some prospective nurses worry about standardized testing. Fortunately, you may not always need to worry about exams like the TEAS or HESI; you can explore programs that address the question: do you have to take a teas test for lpn? This can make starting a nursing career more approachable for many students.

For those interested in healthcare’s administrative or technical side, online degrees in healthcare administration are increasingly popular. These healthcare administration degree programs can often be completed quickly, preparing graduates for leadership roles within clinics or hospitals. Alternatively, if you prefer working with medical data, there are several medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid, making this career path accessible and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Peng T. Khaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles