World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
100
Citations
216491
World Ranking
606
National Ranking
383

Richard S. Lazarus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard S. Lazarus sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 210 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard S. Lazarus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard S. Lazarus sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 1989 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 1969 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1963 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Richard S. Lazarus was affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their academic career included numerous contributions to the field of psychology, noted through multiple awards recognizing their scientific work.

Lazarus received prestigious honors such as the William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 1989 and the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association in the same year. Earlier in their career, they were named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1969 and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1963.

Although specific data about their recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, and detailed topics of research are not provided, the recognition from multiple distinguished organizations indicates a significant impact within their professional discipline. Their affiliation with a major university further situates their work within a strong academic context.

Richard S. Lazarus contributed to psychology through their extensive research span, which was acknowledged by their peers through awards spanning over multiple decades. Their membership and fellowship in leading scientific associations reflect an ongoing engagement with scientific advancement in their field.

Best Publications

  • Stress, appraisal, and coping

    Richard S. Lazarus;Susan Folkman

  • [An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample].

    S Folkman;R S Lazarus

  • Psychological stress and the coping process

    Richard S. Lazarus

  • If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination.

    Susan Folkman;Richard S. Lazarus

  • Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes.

    Susan Folkman;Richard S. Lazarus;Christine Dunkel-Schetter;Anita DeLongis

  • Emotion and Adaptation

    Richard S. Lazarus

  • Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer;

    R Lazarus;S Folkman

  • Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events

    Allen D. Kanner;James C. Coyne;Catherine Schaefer;Richard S. Lazarus

  • Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms.

    Susan Folkman;Richard S. Lazarus;Rand J. Gruen;Anita DeLongis

  • Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis

    Richard S. Lazarus

  • Coping theory and research : Past, present, and future

    Richard S. Lazarus

  • From Psychological Stress to the Emotions: A History of Changing Outlooks

    Richard S. Lazarus

  • Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion.

    Richard S. Lazarus

  • Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping

    Richard S. Lazarus;Susan Folkman

  • The impact of daily stress on health and mood: Psychological and social resources as mediators.

    Anita DeLongis;Susan Folkman;Richard S. Lazarus

  • The health-related functions of social support.

    Catherine Schaefer;James C. Coyne;Richard S. Lazarus

  • Coping as a mediator of emotion.

    Susan Folkman;Richard S. Lazarus

  • Stress-Related Transactions between Person and Environment

    Richard S. Lazarus;Raymond Launier

  • Estrés y procesos cognitivos

    Richard S. Lazarus;Manuel Valdés Miyar;Susan Folkman

  • Relationship of daily hassles, uplifts, and major life events to health status

    Anita DeLongis;James C. Coyne;Gayle Dakof;Susan Folkman

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan Folkman
Susan Folkman University of California, San Francisco
James R. Averill
James R. Averill University of Massachusetts Amherst
Anita DeLongis
Anita DeLongis University of British Columbia
James C. Coyne
James C. Coyne University of Groningen
Craig A. Smith
Craig A. Smith Vanderbilt University
Asher Koriat
Asher Koriat University of Haifa
Carolyn M. Aldwin
Carolyn M. Aldwin Oregon State University
Charles W. Eriksen
Charles W. Eriksen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
J. Richard Jennings
J. Richard Jennings University of Pittsburgh
Gayle A. Dakof
Gayle A. Dakof University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to many online degree programs and diverse career pathways. One popular route is specializing in speech-language pathology, where psychologists work closely with individuals who have speech, language, or communication disorders.

Requirements for pursuing these roles differ across states. For example, slp requirements in Massachusetts outline the educational and licensure steps needed to practice. Similar guidelines exist in other states, such as the Michigan speech pathologist certification requirements, which detail the criteria for eligibility and licensure exams.

In addition, professionals can explore how to become a speech language pathologist in Minnesota or learn about becoming a speech therapist in Mississippi. These resources describe state-specific requirements and available online study options, making them invaluable for anyone seeking flexibility or state-to-state mobility in their psychology career.

Whether you are interested in online degrees or state licensure, understanding these pathways helps you make informed decisions about your education and future profession in psychology or its related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Richard S. Lazarus

Recently Published Articles