World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
32316
World Ranking
3044
National Ranking
1731

Charles W. Eriksen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles W. Eriksen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Charles W. Eriksen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles W. Eriksen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles W. Eriksen is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research contributions have been associated with this institution throughout their career.

The available information does not include recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues related to their work. There are also no records of book publications, awards, or detailed data on fields and subfields of study related to Eriksen.

Due to the lack of explicit information on publications, the profile cannot specify titles, years, or venues of any scientific articles or books authored by Eriksen. Additionally, no main topics or focused research areas have been documented in the provided data.

Further details such as collaboration patterns, frequent co-authors, and recognized achievements are not listed, limiting the overview to the general affiliation and identity of the scientist.

Best Publications

  • Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task

    Barbara A. Eriksen;Charles W. Eriksen

  • Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model

    Charles W. Eriksen;James D. St. James

  • Allocation of attention in the visual field.

    Charles W. Eriksen;Yei-Yu Yeh

  • Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results.

    Charles W. Eriksen;Derek W. Schultz

  • Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis

    Gabriele Gratton;Michael G. H. Coles;Erik J. Sirevaag;Charles W. Eriksen

  • Operationism and the concept of perception.

    Wendell R. Garner;Harold W. Hake;Charles W. Eriksen

  • A Psychophysiological Investigation of the Continuous Flow Model of Human Information Processing

    Michael G.H. Coles;Gabriele Gratton;Theodore R. Bashore;Charles W. Eriksen

  • Discrimination and learning without awareness: a methodological survey and evaluation.

    Charles W. Eriksen

  • Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays.

    Charles W. Eriksen;James E. Hoffman

  • The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays

    Charles W. Eriksen;James E. Hoffman

  • The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems

    Charles W. Eriksen

  • Some temporal characteristics of visual pattern perception.

    Charles W. Eriksen;James F. Collins

  • Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction-time response.

    Joseph S. Lappin;Charles W. Eriksen

  • Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations

    Charles W. Eriksen;Terry Spencer

  • Temporal luminance summation effects in backward and forward masking

    Charles W. Eriksen

  • An electromyographic examination of response competition

    Charles W. Eriksen;Michael G. H. Coles;L. R. Morris;William P. O’hara

  • Temporal course of selective attention

    Charles W. Eriksen;James F. Collins

  • Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues.

    Timothy D. Murphy;Charles W. Eriksen

  • Selective encoding from multielement visual displays

    Robert L. Colegatef;James E. Hoffman;Charles W. Eriksen

  • Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time

    Charles W. Eriksen;James E. Hoffman

  • Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: a critical look at the evidence.

    Charles W. Eriksen;Timothy D. Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Hoffman
James E. Hoffman University of Delaware
Joseph S. Lappin
Joseph S. Lappin Vanderbilt University
Michael G. H. Coles
Michael G. H. Coles University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Emanuel Donchin
Emanuel Donchin University of South Florida
Gabriele Gratton
Gabriele Gratton University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Richard S. Lazarus
Richard S. Lazarus University of California, Berkeley
Lloyd G. Humphreys
Lloyd G. Humphreys University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling opens a variety of flexible education and career options. Many students seek programs that combine academic rigor with accessible coursework. Recently, several rankings highlight the easiest online counseling degree programs ranking in Los Angeles and other regions, making it simpler to compare pathways that fit your lifestyle.

For those interested in advanced training, the Pennsylvania easiest counseling master degrees online showcase flexible and accessible graduate options. Nationally, the easiest online counseling master's programs in the United States provide insight into where you can pursue a specialized credential with a streamlined approach.

If you want to broaden your search, national resources like the easiest online counseling degree programs ranking in America make it easier to find reputable and accessible psychology and counseling programs across the country.

These programs can lead to roles in mental health counseling, school counseling, substance abuse counseling, and other rewarding fields. Consider your career goals, learning preferences, and required accreditations when choosing an online psychology or counseling degree.

Best Scientists Citing Charles W. Eriksen

Recently Published Articles