World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
29249
World Ranking
11794
National Ranking
370

Joanne P. Young publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne P. Young sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 302 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joanne P. Young D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne P. Young sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joanne P. Young is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their research topics emphasize genetic and clinical aspects of colorectal and gastrointestinal cancers. The main topics of their work include:

  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

Joanne P. Young has contributed to multiple research publications, with notable recent papers listed below:

  • Young-onset colorectal cancer is associated with a personal history of type 2 diabetes, 2020, Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Survey of germline variants in cancer-associated genes in young adults with colorectal cancer, 2021, Genes Chromosomes and Cancer
  • Cancer Risks for MLH 1 and MSH 2 Mutation Carriers, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Immunohistochemistry features and molecular pathology of appendiceal neoplasms, 2021, Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
  • Young-Onset Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Survival Trends in the Northern Territory, Australia, with Emphasis on Indigenous Peoples, 2022, Cancers

The venues in which Joanne P. Young frequently publishes demonstrate a distribution across both specialized and broader scientific journals. These include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Gastroenterology
  • Cancers
  • Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences

The collaboration network of Joanne P. Young includes several frequent co-authors. The most recurrent collaborators are:

  • John A. Baron
  • Daniel D. Buchanan
  • John L. Hopper
  • Timothy Price
  • Aung Ko Win

Joanne P. Young's publication record shows a sustained focus on the molecular and clinical genetics of colorectal cancer, cancer risk factors, and associated metabolic influences.

Best Publications

  • CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer.

    Daniel J Weisenberger;Kimberly D Siegmund;Mihaela Campan;Joanne Young

  • Epigenetic stem cell signature in cancer.

    Martin Widschwendter;Heidi Fiegl;Heidi Fiegl;Daniel Egle;Elisabeth Mueller-Holzner

  • Serrated Lesions of the Colorectum: Review and Recommendations From an Expert Panel

    Douglas K. Rex;Dennis J. Ahnen;John A. Baron;Kenneth P. Batts

  • Immunohistochemistry Versus Microsatellite Instability Testing in Phenotyping Colorectal Tumors

    Noralane M. Lindor;Lawrence J. Burgart;Olga Leontovich;Richard M. Goldberg

  • BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum

    T Kambara;L A Simms;V L J Whitehall;K J Spring

  • Emerging concepts in colorectal neoplasia

    Jeremy R. Jass;Vicki L.J. Whitehall;Joanne Young;Barbara A. Leggett

  • The clinical phenotype of Lynch syndrome due to germ-line PMS2 mutations

    Leigha Senter;Mark Clendenning;Kaisa Sotamaa;Heather Hampel

  • High Prevalence of Sessile Serrated Adenomas With BRAF Mutations: A Prospective Study of Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy

    Kevin J. Spring;Zhen Zhen Zhao;Rozemary Karamatic;Michael D. Walsh

  • Morphology of sporadic colorectal cancer with DNA replication errors

    J. R. Jass;Kim-Anh Do;L. A. Simms;H. Iino

  • Microsatellite instability in the insulin–like growth factor II receptor gene in gastrointestinal tumours

    R. F. Souza;R. Appel;J. Yin;S. Wang

  • Features of colorectal cancers with high-level microsatellite instability occurring in familial and sporadic settings: parallel pathways of tumorigenesis.

    Joanne Young;Lisa A. Simms;Kelli G. Biden;Coral Wynter

  • Risks of Lynch Syndrome Cancers for MSH6 Mutation Carriers

    Laura Baglietto;Noralane M. Lindor;James G. Dowty;Darren M. White

  • Pathology features in Bethesda guidelines predict colorectal cancer microsatellite instability: a population-based study.

    Mark A. Jenkins;Shinichi Hayashi;Anne Marie O'Shea;Lawrence J. Burgart

  • Colorectal and Other Cancer Risks for Carriers and Noncarriers From Families With a DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation: A Prospective Cohort Study

    Aung Ko Win;Joanne P Young;Noralane M Lindor;Katherine M. Tucker

  • DNA microsatellite instability in hyperplastic polyps, serrated adenomas, and mixed polyps: a mild mutator pathway for colorectal cancer?

    H Iino;J R Jass;L A Simms;J Young

  • Correlation of tumour BRAF mutations and MLH1 methylation with germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation status: a literature review assessing utility of tumour features for MMR variant classification

    Michael T Parsons;Daniel D Buchanan;Bryony Thompson;Joanne P Young

  • Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Risk for Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation Carriers: The Advantage of More Extensive Colon Surgery

    Susan Parry;Susan Parry;Aung Ko Win;Bryan Parry;Finlay A Macrae

  • Characterisation of a subtype of colorectal cancer combining features of the suppressor and mild mutator pathways.

    Jeremy R. Jass;Kelli G. Biden;Margaret C. Cummings;Lisa A. Simms

  • Advanced colorectal polyps with the molecular and morphological features of serrated polyps and adenomas: concept of a ‘fusion’ pathway to colorectal cancer

    J R Jass;K Baker;I Zlobec;T Higuchi;T Higuchi

  • Methylation of O-6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase characterizes a subset of colorectal cancer with low-level DNA microsatellite instability.

    Vicki L. J. Whitehall;Michael D. Walsh;Joanne Young;Barbara A. Leggett

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara A. Leggett
Barbara A. Leggett University of Queensland
Daniel D. Buchanan
Daniel D. Buchanan University of Melbourne
Michael Walsh
Michael Walsh Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
John L. Hopper
John L. Hopper University of Melbourne
Jeremy R. Jass
Jeremy R. Jass Imperial College London
Mark A. Jenkins
Mark A. Jenkins University of Melbourne
Polly A. Newcomb
Polly A. Newcomb Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Robert W. Haile
Robert W. Haile Stanford University
John D. Potter
John D. Potter Massey University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the USA opens up a variety of alternative healthcare career options beyond a traditional MD. For those seeking flexibility and faster entry into the workforce, some students look into enrolling at a nursing school that does not require TEAS test, removing a key barrier and streamlining the admissions process.

If you’re interested in leadership or hospital management, a health care administration degree can be earned entirely online and prepares graduates for dynamic roles in fast-growing healthcare organizations. Nurses aiming to advance their credentials and scope of practice may consider an ASN to FNP bridge program, offering a quicker route to a Family Nurse Practitioner certification.

Additionally, those passionate about wellness and preventative health may benefit from a nutritionist online degree, which provides in-depth knowledge of dietary science and opens doors to roles in community health, public policy, or private consultation. These diverse pathways provide rewarding alternatives for students interested in healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Joanne P. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles