World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
114
Citations
52204
World Ranking
4702
National Ranking
464

Jeremy R. Jass publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy R. Jass sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 442 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jeremy R. Jass D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy R. Jass sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeremy R. Jass was affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research work focused primarily on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with particular emphasis on subfields such as Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

Their main topics of study centered around genetic factors in colorectal cancer, digestive system and related health issues, and DNA repair mechanisms. These areas form the core of their scientific contributions and reflect the specialized nature of their investigations.

Jeremy R. Jass published their research predominantly in the venue UNC Libraries, which hosted two of their known papers. These papers are:

  • Immunohistochemical testing of conventional adenomas for loss of expression of mismatch repair proteins in Lynch syndrome mutation carriers: a case series from the Australasian site of the colon cancer family registry, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Lower Cancer Incidence in Amsterdam-I Criteria Families Without Mismatch Repair Deficiency: Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X, 2020, UNC Libraries

The scientist collaborated frequently with several co-authors throughout their career. These frequent collaborators included:

  • John L. Hopper
  • John A. Baron
  • Stephen N. Thibodeau
  • Noralane M. Lindor
  • Michael D. Walsh

Jeremy R. Jass's research contributed to the understanding of colorectal cancer genetics and molecular pathology, with an emphasis on how mismatch repair protein expression affects cancer incidence and development. Their work also involved familial cancer syndromes, such as Lynch syndrome, and familial colorectal cancer type X.

Best Publications

  • Revised Bethesda Guidelines for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (Lynch Syndrome) and Microsatellite Instability

    Asad Umar;C. Richard Boland;Jonathan P. Terdiman;Sapna Syngal

  • Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

    Fredrick S. Leach;Nicholas C. Nicolaides;Nickolas Papadopoulos;Bo Liu

  • CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer.

    Daniel J Weisenberger;Kimberly D Siegmund;Mihaela Campan;Joanne Young

  • Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features

    Jeremy R. Jass

  • Analysis of mismatch repair genes in hereditary non–polyposis colorectal cancer patients

    Bo Liu;Ramon Parsons;Nickolas Papadopoulos;Nicholas C. Nicolaides

  • Genetic Mapping of a Locus Predisposing to Human Colorectal Cancer

    Päivi Peltomäki;Lauri A. Aaltonen;Pertti Sistonen;Lea Pylkkänen

  • A NEW PROGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION OF RECTAL-CANCER

    Jass;S B Love;J M Northover

  • Immunohistochemistry Versus Microsatellite Instability Testing in Phenotyping Colorectal Tumors

    Noralane M. Lindor;Lawrence J. Burgart;Olga Leontovich;Richard M. Goldberg

  • BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum

    T Kambara;L A Simms;V L J Whitehall;K J Spring

  • Tumour `budding' as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer

    H Ueno;J Murphy;J R Jass;H Mochizuki

  • Replication Errors in Benign and Malignant Tumors from Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Patients

    Lauri A. Aaltonen;Päivi Peltomäki;Jukka Pekka Mecklin;Heikki Järvinen

  • Chromosome 5 allele loss in human colorectal carcinomas.

    E. Solomon;R. Voss;V. Hall;W. F. Bodmer

  • The grading of rectal cancer: historical perspectives and a multivariate analysis of 447 cases.

    J.R. Jass;W.S. Atkin;J. Cuzick;H.J.R. Bussey

  • Lower Cancer Incidence in Amsterdam-I Criteria Families Without Mismatch Repair Deficiency: Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X

    Noralane M. Lindor;Kari Rabe;Gloria M. Petersen;Robert Haile

  • Emerging concepts in colorectal neoplasia

    Jeremy R. Jass;Vicki L.J. Whitehall;Joanne Young;Barbara A. Leggett

  • High Prevalence of Sessile Serrated Adenomas With BRAF Mutations: A Prospective Study of Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy

    Kevin J. Spring;Zhen Zhen Zhao;Rozemary Karamatic;Michael D. Walsh

  • Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa.

    Shin ei Kudo;René Lambert;John I. Allen;Hiroaki Fujii

  • Juvenile polyposis--a precancerous condition.

    J. R. Jass;C. B. Williams;H. J. R. Bussey;B. C. Morson

  • Morphology of sporadic colorectal cancer with DNA replication errors

    J. R. Jass;Kim-Anh Do;L. A. Simms;H. Iino

  • Histological typing of intestinal tumours

    Leslie H. Sobin;Jeremy R. Jass

Frequent Co-Authors

Joanne P. Young
Joanne P. Young University of Adelaide
Barbara A. Leggett
Barbara A. Leggett University of Queensland
Michael Walsh
Michael Walsh Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Ian C. Talbot
Ian C. Talbot Leicester Royal Infirmary
Alessandro Lugli
Alessandro Lugli University of Bern
Daniel D. Buchanan
Daniel D. Buchanan University of Melbourne
John L. Hopper
John L. Hopper University of Melbourne
Mark A. Jenkins
Mark A. Jenkins University of Melbourne
Inti Zlobec
Inti Zlobec University of Bern
Luigi Terracciano
Luigi Terracciano University Hospital of Basel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine goes far beyond becoming a physician. There are a range of online degrees that allow students to build meaningful healthcare careers—often with more flexibility and affordability than traditional on-campus programs.

For those interested in the business and management side of healthcare, consider an affordable healthcare administration degree online. These degrees are ideal for future leaders of hospitals, clinics, and care organizations.

If you are aiming for higher-level administrative roles, a cheapest mha programs online healthcare can open doors to executive positions while keeping costs manageable.

For advanced nursing careers, the least expensive dnp programs offer a pathway to leadership roles in patient care, clinical education, and policy—all from an online format.

Pharmacists are also in high demand, and an online pharmd allows students to earn their Doctorate in Pharmacy while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy R. Jass

Recently Published Articles