World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
49150
World Ranking
8442
National Ranking
4365

Richard J. Cote publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Cote sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 348 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard J. Cote D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Cote sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard J. Cote is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected disciplines within medicine and molecular biology, focusing primarily on cancer detection, diagnostics, and treatment modalities.

The main fields of study covered by their research include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

The scientist's work is further specialized into subfields such as:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery

The key topics explored throughout their publications consist of:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard J. Cote include:

  • Changhuei Yang
  • Mark A. Watson
  • Haowen Zhou
  • Siddarth Rawal
  • Ashutosh Agarwal

The scientist has contributed to various scholarly venues, notably publishing multiple papers in:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Cell Reports Medicine
  • European Urology
  • Cancers
  • The Journal of Pathology

Richard J. Cote's research output includes recent papers addressing significant topics in cancer diagnosis and therapy, including:

  • The Liquid Biopsy Consortium: Challenges and opportunities for early cancer detection and monitoring, 2023, Cell Reports Medicine
  • Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data from Randomised Controlled Trials, 2021, European Urology
  • Circulating Tumor Cells from Enumeration to Analysis: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities, 2021, Cancers
  • Extrinsic and intrinsic preanalytical variables affecting liquid biopsy in cancer, 2023, Cell Reports Medicine
  • Automatic detection of circulating tumor cells and cancer associated fibroblasts using deep learning, 2023, Scientific Reports

Besides journal publications, this scientist has contributed to book literature, evidenced by a publication with Springer International Publishing titled "Circulating Tumor Cells" in 2023.

Best Publications

  • American society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer

    Antonio C. Wolff;M. Elizabeth H. Hammond;Jared N. Schwartz;Karen L. Hagerty

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

    Antonio C. Wolff;M. Elizabeth H. Hammond;Jared N. Schwartz;Karen L. Hagerty

  • Radical Cystectomy in the Treatment of Invasive Bladder Cancer: Long-Term Results in 1,054 Patients

    John P. Stein;Gary Lieskovsky;Richard Cote;Susan Groshen

  • Bioassay of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) using microcantilevers.

    Guanghua Wu;Ram H. Datar;Karolyn M. Hansen;Thomas Thundat

  • Accumulation of Nuclear p53 and Tumor Progression in Bladder Cancer

    David Esrig;Donald Elmajian;Susan Groshen;John A. Freeman

  • Generation of human monoclonal antibodies reactive with cellular antigens

    Richard J. Cote;Donna M. Morrissey;Alan N. Houghton;Edward J. Beattie

  • Most Early Disseminated Cancer Cells Detected in Bone Marrow of Breast Cancer Patients Have a Putative Breast Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype

    Marija Balic;Henry Lin;Lillian Young;Debra Hawes

  • Membrane microfilter device for selective capture, electrolysis and genomic analysis of human circulating tumor cells

    Siyang Zheng;Henry Lin;Jing Quan Liu;Jing Quan Liu;Marija Balic

  • Two molecular pathways to transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

    Charles H. Spruck;Petra F. Ohneseit;Mirella Gonzalez-Zulueta;David Esrig

  • Detection and clinical importance of micrometastatic disease

    Klaus Pantel;Richard J. Cote;Øystein Fodstad

  • Origin of nanomechanical cantilever motion generated from biomolecular interactions.

    Guanghua Wu;Haifeng Ji;Karolyn Hansen;Thomas Thundat

  • Antigen Retrieval Immunohistochemistry: Past, Present, and Future

    Shan Rong Shi;Richard J. Cote;Clive R. Taylor

  • Role of immunohistochemical detection of lymph-node metastases in management of breast cancer

    RJ Cote;H Fpeterson;B Chaiwun;RD Gelber

  • Prediction of early relapse in patients with operable breast cancer by detection of occult bone marrow micrometastases.

    R J Cote;P P Rosen;M L Lesser;L J Old

  • p53 nuclear protein accumulation correlates with mutations in the p53 gene, tumor grade, and stage in bladder cancer.

    David Esrig;Charles H. Spruck;Peter W. Nichols;Benjaporn Chaiwun

  • Angiogenesis in Bladder Cancer: Relationship Between Microvessel Density and Tumor Prognosis

    Bernard H. Bochner;Richard J. Cote;Noel Weidner;Susan Groshen

  • Portable Filter-Based Microdevice for Detection and Characterization of Circulating Tumor Cells

    Henry K. Lin;Siyang Zheng;Anthony J. Williams;Marija Balic

  • Cantilever-based optical deflection assay for discrimination of DNA single-nucleotide mismatches.

    Karolyn M. Hansen;† Hai-Feng Ji;Guanghua Wu;Ram Datar

  • 3D microfilter device for viable circulating tumor cell (CTC) enrichment from blood

    Siyang Zheng;Henry K. Lin;Bo Lu;Anthony Williams

  • REVIEW Detection and Clinical Importance of Micrometastatic Disease

    Klaus Pantel;Richard J. Cote;Øystein Fodstad

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan Groshen
Susan Groshen University of Southern California
Donald G. Skinner
Donald G. Skinner University of Southern California
Clive R. Taylor
Clive R. Taylor University of Southern California
Yu-Chong Tai
Yu-Chong Tai California Institute of Technology
Mark E. Thompson
Mark E. Thompson University of Southern California
Lloyd J. Old
Lloyd J. Old Ludwig Cancer Research
Chongwu Zhou
Chongwu Zhou University of Southern California
Alan N. Houghton
Alan N. Houghton Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Herbert F. Oettgen
Herbert F. Oettgen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Seth P. Lerner
Seth P. Lerner Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative health-related degrees can offer flexible and rewarding pathways if you are considering, or are currently studying, Medicine in the USA. For those who may have a non-nursing background, direct entry online MSN programs provide routes to advanced nursing qualifications without a prior nursing degree, helping to accelerate your entry into the healthcare workforce.

For aspiring nurses seeking accessible options, reviewing easy nursing schools to get into can help identify programs with more flexible admissions, increasing your chances of acceptance. If you’re interested in roles such as medical billing and coding, accredited programs are available remotely, and you may benefit from medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid to support your education.

Finally, licensure processes can be simplified with certain schools. Prospective practical nurses can consider lpn school without teas test to avoid standard entrance exam requirements. Exploring these varied online degrees can help you find a career path that matches your goals and circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Cote

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles