World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
27478
World Ranking
13192
National Ranking
6723

Herbert F. Oettgen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herbert F. Oettgen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 318 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Herbert F. Oettgen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herbert F. Oettgen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Herbert F. Oettgen is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their work has focused primarily within the field of medical research, though specific subfields or topics, as well as detailed publication records, are not available.

There are no records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or regular publication venues linked to Herbert F. Oettgen in the provided data. Similarly, information regarding book publications or awards has not been noted.

Given the limited data, the overview of Herbert F. Oettgen's academic contributions is based mainly on institutional association without extensive details on specific research areas or scholarly output.

Best Publications

  • Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Neutropenia and Associated Morbidity Due to Chemotherapy for Transitional-Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelium

    J.L. Gabrilove;J.L. Gabrilove;A. Jakubowski;A. Jakubowski;H. Scher;H. Scher;C. Sternberg;C. Sternberg

  • Generation of human monoclonal antibodies reactive with cellular antigens

    Richard J. Cote;Donna M. Morrissey;Alan N. Houghton;Edward J. Beattie

  • Mouse monoclonal IgG3 antibody detecting GD3 ganglioside: a phase I trial in patients with malignant melanoma.

    Alan N. Houghton;David Mintzer;Carlos Cordon-Cardo;Sydney Welt

  • Cell surface antigens of human malignant melanoma: definition of six antigenic systems with mouse monoclonal antibodies

    Wolfgang G. Dippold;Kenneth O. Lloyd;Lucy T. C. Li;Hisami Ikeda

  • GD3, a prominent ganglioside of human melanoma. Detection and characterisation by mouse monoclonal antibody.

    Clifford S. Pukel;Kenneth O. Lloyd;Luiz R. Travassos;Wolfgang G. Dippold

  • Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level as a Prognostic Indicator in Colorectal Cancer

    Harold J. Wanebo;Bhaskar Rao;Carl M. Pinsky;Raymond G. Hoffman

  • PRECIPITATING ANTIBODY IN HUMAN SERUM TO AN ANTIGEN PRESENT IN CULTURED BURKITT'S LYMPHOMA CELLS

    L J Old;E A Boyse;H F Oettgen;E D Harven

  • Cell surface antigens of human malignant melanoma: mixed hemadsorption assays for humoral immunity to cultured autologous melanoma cells.

    Thomas E. Carey;Toshitada Takahashi;Lois A. Resnick;Herbert F. Oettgen

  • Preliminary Observations on the Effect of Recombinant Leukocyte a Interferon in Homosexual Men with Kaposi's Sarcoma

    Susan E. Krown;Francisco X. Real;Susanna Cunningham-Rundles;Patricia L. Myskowski

  • Tumor necrosis factor and the acute metabolic response to tissue injury in man.

    H F Starnes;R S Warren;M Jeevanandam;J L Gabrilove

  • Inhibition of leukemias in man by L-asparaginase.

    Oettgen Hf;Old Lj;Boyse Ea;Campbell Ha

  • Toxicity of E. coli L-asparaginase in man.

    Herbert F. Oettgen;Phyllis A. Stephenson;Morton K. Schwartz;Robert D. Leeper

  • Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy prevents tumor progression and death from superficial bladder cancer: ten-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.

    Harry W. Herr;David M. Schwalb;Zuo-Feng Zhang;Pramod C. Sogani

  • Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy alters the progression of superficial bladder cancer.

    H W Herr;V P Laudone;R A Badalament;H F Oettgen

  • Cell-surface glycoproteins of human sarcomas: differential expression in normal and malignant tissues and cultured cells

    W J Rettig;P Garin-Chesa;H R Beresford;H F Oettgen

  • Vaccines containing purified GM2 ganglioside elicit GM2 antibodies in melanoma patients.

    Philip O. Livingston;Edward J. Natoli;Michele Jones Calves;Elisabeth Stockert

  • T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity against autologous malignant melanoma: analysis with interleukin 2-dependent T-cell cultures

    Alexander Knuth;Barbara Danowski;Herbert F. Oettgen;Lloyd J. Old

  • Expression of Lewisa, Lewisb, X, and Y blood group antigens in human colonic tumors and normal tissue and in human tumor-derived cell lines.

    Junichi Sakamoto;Koichi Furukawa;Carlos Cordon-Cardo;Beatrice W. T. Yin

  • The acute metabolic effects of tumor necrosis factor administration in humans.

    Robert S. Warren;H. Fletcher Starnes;Janice L. Gabrilove;Herbert F. Oettgen

  • GD3 Vaccines for Melanoma: Superior Immunogenicity of Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin Conjugate Vaccines

    Friedhelm Helling;Ann Shang;Michele Calves;Shengle Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Lloyd J. Old
Lloyd J. Old Ludwig Cancer Research
Philip O. Livingston
Philip O. Livingston Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Alan N. Houghton
Alan N. Houghton Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Harold J. Wanebo
Harold J. Wanebo Landmark Medical Center
Kenneth O. Lloyd
Kenneth O. Lloyd Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Myron R. Melamed
Myron R. Melamed New York Medical College
Francisco X. Real
Francisco X. Real Pompeu Fabra University
Hiroshi Shiku
Hiroshi Shiku Mie University
Willet F. Whitmore
Willet F. Whitmore Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Richard J. Cote
Richard J. Cote Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in healthcare but not sure if medical school is right for you? There are many flexible online options that open doors to rewarding roles in medicine and healthcare.

For a non-clinical path, medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid make it possible to start working in the field with lower upfront costs. This is ideal for those seeking a stable medical office career without patient-facing duties.

If you want to work directly with patients and are considering nursing, but worried about admissions testing, some institutions let you start your journey through do you have to take a teas test for lpn programs that waive standardized exam requirements.

Ambitious students looking for advancement can explore administrative roles with a healthcare administration accelerated degree, often available in flexible formats for working adults.

Registered Nurses aspiring to become Nurse Practitioners can fast-track their careers through specialized rn to np bridge program options that significantly reduce the time to an advanced degree.

Best Scientists Citing Herbert F. Oettgen

Recently Published Articles