World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
20725
World Ranking
15790
National Ranking
7948

Harold J. Wanebo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold J. Wanebo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 369 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Harold J. Wanebo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold J. Wanebo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Harold J. Wanebo is affiliated with Landmark Medical Center in the United States. Their professional focus is centered within the medical field, contributing to clinical and research activities at this institution.

While specific research papers, coauthors, and publication venues associated with Harold J. Wanebo are not documented, the primary institutional affiliation provides a context for their work. Landmark Medical Center is known for its involvement in various medical disciplines, potentially indicating a clinical or translational research orientation.

At present, there is no publicly available record of books published by Harold J. Wanebo, nor detailed data on the main fields or subfields of study. Similarly, there are no formal listings of frequent coauthors or dominant publication venues linked to their work.

There is also no recorded data on awards or honors received by Harold J. Wanebo. The absence of specified recent papers, topics, or specific academic contributions limits a more detailed scientific profile, but the institutional affiliation suggests engagement in medical practice and possibly clinical investigation.

Best Publications

  • Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons.

    Harold J. Wanebo;B. J. Kennedy;Joan Chmiel;Glenn Steele

  • Efficacy of an elective regional lymph node dissection of 1 to 4 mm thick melanomas for patients 60 years of age and younger.

    Charles M. Balch;Seng Jaw Soong;Alfred A. Bartolucci;Marshall M. Urist

  • Efficacy of 2-cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1 to 4 mm). Results of a multi-institutional randomized surgical trial.

    Charles M. Balch;Marshall M. Urist;Constantine P. Karakousis;Thomas J. Smith

  • Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level as a Prognostic Indicator in Colorectal Cancer

    Harold J. Wanebo;Bhaskar Rao;Carl M. Pinsky;Raymond G. Hoffman

  • Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional Randomized Trial Comparing Prognostic Factors and Surgical Results for Intermediate Thickness Melanomas (1.0 to 4.0 mm)

    Charles M. Balch;Seng Jaw Soong;Merrick I. Ross;Marshall M. Urist

  • Long-term results of a prospective surgical trial comparing 2 cm vs. 4 cm excision margins for 740 patients with 1-4 mm melanomas.

    Charles M. Balch;Seng-jaw Soong;Thomas Smith;Merrick I. Ross

  • Younger women with breast carcinoma have a poorer prognosis than older women.

    Maureen Chung;Helena R. Chang M.D.;Kirby I. Bland;Harold J. Wanebo

  • Pelvic resection of recurrent rectal cancer

    Harold Wanebo;R. Koness;Michael Vezeridis;Steven Cohen

  • Pelvic resection of recurrent rectal cancer: Technical considerations and outcomes

    Harold J. Wanebo;Harold J. Wanebo;Pamela Antoniuk;Pamela Antoniuk;R. James Koness;R. James Koness;Audrey Levy;Audrey Levy

  • Head and neck sarcoma : report of the head and neck sarcoma registry

    H J Wanebo;R J Koness;J K MacFarlane;F R Eilber

  • T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: transanal excision or radical surgery?

    David J. Bentrem;Satoshi Okabe;W. Douglas Wong;Jose G. Guillem

  • Giant condyloma acuminatum (Buschke-Lowenstein tumor) of the anorectal and perianal regions. Analysis of 42 cases.

    Quyen D. Chu;Michael P. Vezeridis;N. Peter Libbey;Harold J. Wanebo

  • Surgical management of patients with primary operable colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases

    Harold J. Wanebo;Christopoulos Semoglou;Fadi Attiyeh;Maus J. Stearns

  • Pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer. Options for curative resection.

    Harold J. Wanebo;Douglas L. Gaker;Richard Whitehill;Raymond F. Morgan

  • Patient selection for hepatic resection of colorectal metastases.

    Harold J. Wanebo;Quyen D. Chu;Michael P. Vezeridis;Clarence Soderberg

  • T-cell deficiency in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

    Harold J. Wanebo;Moo Young Jun;Elliot W. Strong;Herbert Oettgen

  • Malignant melanoma of the extremities: a clinicopathologic study using levels of invasion (microstage).

    Harold J. Wanebo;James Woodruff;Joseph G. Fortner

  • Abdominal Sacral Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

    Harold J. Wanebo;Ralph C. Marcove

  • Prognostic and therapeutic use of microstaging of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the trunk and extremities.

    Harold I. Friedman;Philip H. Cooper;Harold J. Wanebo

  • The effect of surgical wounding on tumour development.

    S.O.P. Hofer;G. Molema;R.A.E.C. Hermens;H.J. Wanebo

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert F. Oettgen
Herbert F. Oettgen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Kirby I. Bland
Kirby I. Bland University of Alabama at Birmingham
Vincent J. Hearing
Vincent J. Hearing National Institutes of Health
David L. Rimm
David L. Rimm Yale University
Harald J. Hoekstra
Harald J. Hoekstra University Medical Center Groningen
Charles M. Balch
Charles M. Balch The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Arlene A. Forastiere
Arlene A. Forastiere Johns Hopkins University
Elliot W. Strong
Elliot W. Strong Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
William G. Cioffi
William G. Cioffi Brown University
Alfred A. Bartolucci
Alfred A. Bartolucci University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine opens the door to a wide range of related online degree options. Many students consider healthcare administration degree programs to build vital management and leadership skills for roles in hospitals, clinics, or healthcare companies. These degrees offer accelerated, flexible pathways for those seeking to move into healthcare leadership.

If you are a registered nurse looking for career advancement, adn to np programs online provide a streamlined route to becoming a nurse practitioner. These bridge programs are popular for their convenience and comprehensive coursework tailored to working professionals.

For students interested in the science of nutrition and wellness, nutrition degrees online offer a pathway to roles in dietetics, public health, or research. The flexibility of online study means you can balance learning with other commitments.

Finally, aspiring healthcare executives can consider cahme accredited mha online programs, recognized for their high standards in healthcare management education. These programs equip graduates with the skills needed for leading complex healthcare organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Harold J. Wanebo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles