World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
113
Citations
52582
World Ranking
4909
National Ranking
2659

Daniel G. Coit publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Coit sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 454 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel G. Coit D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Coit sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel G. Coit is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their body of research predominantly spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their research primarily addresses topics including:

  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Metastasis and carcinoma case studies
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways

Significant recent papers by Daniel G. Coit include:

  • Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical practice guidelines, 2020, The Lancet Oncology
  • Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling in Cutaneous Melanoma, 2020, JAMA Dermatology
  • Performance of Gene Expression Profile Tests for Prognosis in Patients With Localized Cutaneous Melanoma, 2020, JAMA Dermatology
  • NCCN Guidelines Insights: Uveal Melanoma, Version 1.2019., 2020, PubMed
  • Indications for Total Gastrectomy in CDH1 Mutation Carriers and Outcomes of Risk-Reducing Minimally Invasive and Open Gastrectomies, 2020, JAMA Surgery

Frequent co-authors associated with Daniel G. Coit include:

  • Vivian E. Strong
  • Yelena Y. Janjigian
  • Laura H. Tang
  • Steven B. Maron
  • Geoffrey Y. Ku

Daniel G. Coit's research has appeared most often in the following publication venues:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  • Annals of Surgery
  • Journal of Surgical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Final Version of 2009 AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification

    Charles M. Balch;Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;Seng Jaw Soong;John F. Thompson

  • Final Version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma

    Charles M. Balch;Antonio C. Buzaid;Seng-Jaw Soong;Michael B. Atkins

  • Prognostic Factors Analysis of 17,600 Melanoma Patients: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System

    Charles M. Balch;Seng-Jaw Soong;Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;John F. Thompson

  • Liver resection for colorectal metastases.

    Y Fong;A M Cohen;J G Fortner;W E Enker

  • Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Prognosis and Treatment of Patients From a Single Institution

    Peter J. Allen;Wilbur B. Bowne;David P. Jaques;Murray F. Brennan

  • Clinicopathologic correlates of solitary fibrous tumors.

    Jason S. Gold;Cristina R. Antonescu;Cristina Hajdu;Cristina R. Ferrone

  • Lymph node metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Analysis of data from a prospective database of 1772 sarcoma patients.

    Yuman Fong;Daniel G. Coit;James M. Woodruff;Murray F. Brennan

  • Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of the Value of Intraperitoneal Drainage After Pancreatic Resection

    Kevin C. Conlon;Daniel Labow;Dennis Leung;Alex Smith

  • Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical guidelines with an emphasis on germline CDH1 mutation carriers.

    Rachel S van der Post;Ingrid P Vogelaar;Fátima Carneiro;Parry Guilford

  • An Evidence‐based Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma

    Charles M. Balch;Seng Jaw Soong;Michael B. Atkins;Antonio C. Buzaid

  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

    Brian J O’Hea;Arnold D.K Hill;Ayda M El-Shirbiny;Samuel D.J Yeh

  • A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

    Charles M. Balch;Antonio C. Buzaid;Michael B. Atkins;Natale Cascinelli

  • Multivariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors Among 2,313 Patients With Stage III Melanoma: Comparison of Nodal Micrometastases Versus Macrometastases

    Charles M. Balch;Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;Seng Jaw Soong;John F. Thompson

  • Founder and Recurrent CDH1 Mutations in Families With Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer

    Pardeep Kaurah;Andrée MacMillan;Niki Boyd;Janine Senz

  • Merkel cell carcinoma. Prognosis and management.

    Anusak Yiengpruksawan;Daniel G. Coit;Howard T. Thaler;Carlos Urmacher

  • Cutaneous melanoma, version 2.2019

    Daniel G. Coit;John A. Thompson;Mark R. Albertini;Christopher Barker

  • Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.

    Eduardo F. Viñuela;Mithat Gonen;Murray F. Brennan;Daniel G. Coit

  • Radical surgery for gastric cancer. A review of the Japanese experience

    Yoshikazu Noguchi;Toshio Imada;Akihiko Matsumoto;Daniel G. Coit

  • Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project

    Takeshi Sano;Daniel G. Coit;Hyung Ho Kim;Franco Roviello

  • Long-term survival following treatment of pseudomyxoma peritonei: an analysis of surgical therapy

    Thomas J. Miner;Jinru Shia;David P. Jaques;David S. Klimstra

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray F. Brennan
Murray F. Brennan Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Mithat Gonen
Mithat Gonen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Laura H. Tang
Laura H. Tang Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Peter J. Allen
Peter J. Allen Duke University
Manish A. Shah
Manish A. Shah Cornell University
Klaus J. Busam
Klaus J. Busam Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Katherine S. Panageas
Katherine S. Panageas Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David P. Kelsen
David P. Kelsen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jedd D. Wolchok
Jedd D. Wolchok Cornell University
John F. Thompson
John F. Thompson University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a medical career in the USA is diverse, with several alternative degrees and pathways that can jumpstart or advance your profession in healthcare. For those interested in the administrative side of medicine, earning a healthcare administration online degree offers flexibility and prepares you for leadership roles in hospital or clinic settings.

If you prefer direct patient care but want to sidestep stringent entrance requirements, consider enrolling in a nursing school that doesn't require teas. This option can make nursing education more accessible for those who excel in practical skills.

Individuals seeking quick entry into the health sector often look at online medical coding classes with financial aid. These programs provide a technical foundation and support through financial assistance opportunities.

Already an RN? Accelerate your advancement by exploring rn to np bridge programs, which streamline your transition to a nurse practitioner role.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel G. Coit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles