World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
23288
World Ranking
12856
National Ranking
6574

Elliot W. Strong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elliot W. Strong sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 181 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Elliot W. Strong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elliot W. Strong sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elliot W. Strong is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus within a research institution known for oncology and medical research.

Details on recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields and subfields of study, or main topics of work were not provided. There is also no information about awards or honors received.

The lack of publications and topics in the available data precludes a detailed overview of particular scientific contributions or research themes.

As such, the profile centers mainly on the current institutional affiliation without further emphasis on specific research outputs or academic collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Predictive value of tumor thickness in squamous carcinoma confined to the tongue and floor of the mouth

    Ronald H. Spiro;Andrew G. Huvos;George Y. Wong;Jeffrey D. Spiro

  • Adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary origin. A clinicopathologic study of 242 cases.

    Ronald H. Spiro;Andrew G. Huvos;Elliot W. Strong

  • Prognostic factors in differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid gland.

    Jatin P. Shah;Thom R. Loree;Digpal Dharker;Elliot W. Strong

  • Significance of positive margins in oral cavity squamous carcinoma

    Thom R. Loree;Elliot W. Strong

  • Granular cell myoblastoma

    Elliot W. Strong;Robert W. McDivitt;Richard D. Brasfield

  • The significance of "positive" margins in surgically resected epidermoid carcinomas

    Kevin G. Looser;Jatin P. Shah;Elliot W. Strong;Elliot W. Strong

  • Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland origin: A clinicopathologic study of 367 cases☆

    Ronald H. Spiro;Andrew G. Huvos;Richard Berk;Elliot W. Strong

  • The indications for elective treatment of the neck in cancer of the major salivary glands

    John G. Armstrong;Louis B. Harrison;Howard T. Thaler;Hamutal Friedlander-Klar

  • Cancer of the parotid gland: A clinicopathologic study of 288 primary cases☆

    Ronald H. Spiro;Andrew G. Huvos;Elliot W. Strong

  • Malignant Tumors of Major Salivary Gland Origin: A Matched-Pair Analysis of the Role of Combined Surgery and Postoperative Radiotherapy

    John G. Armstrong;Louis B. Harrison;Ronald H. Spiro;Daniel E. Fass

  • Carcinoma of the oral cavity. factors affecting treatment failure at the primary site and neck.

    Jatin P. Shah;Ricardo A. Cendon;Hollon W. Farr;Elliot W. Strong

  • Ameloblastoma of maxilla and mandible

    M. K. Sehdev;A. G. Huvos;E. W. Strong;F. P. Gerold

  • Cervical node metastasis from epidermoid carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: A critical assessment of current staging☆

    Ronald H. Spiro;Antonio E. Alfonso;Hollon W. Farr;Elliot W. Strong

  • Failure at the primary site following multimodality treatment in advanced head and neck cancer

    Bhadrasain Vikram;Elliot W. Strong;Jatin P. Shah;Ronald Spiro

  • Detailed quality of life assessment in patients treated with primary radiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the base of the tongue

    Louis B. Harrison;Michael J. Zelefsky;David G. Pfister;Elise Carper

  • Acinic cell carcinoma of salivary origin. A clinicopathologic study of 67 cases

    Ronald H. Spiro;Andrew G. Huvos;Elliot W. Strong

  • Prevalence and predictors of continued tobacco use after treatment of patients with head and neck cancer

    Jamie S. Ostroff;Paul B. Jacobsen;Alyson B. Moadel;Ronald H. Spiro

  • Failure at distant sites following multimodality treatment for advanced head and neck cancer.

    Bhadrasain Vikram;Elliot W. Strong;Jatin P. Shah;Ronald Spiro

  • Failure in the neck following multimodality treatment for advanced head and neck cancer.

    Bhadrasain Vikram;Elliot W. Strong;Jatin P. Shah;Ronald Spiro

  • Adenoid cystic carcinoma: factors influencing survival.

    Ronald H. Spiro;Andrew G. Huvos;Elliot W. Strong

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald H. Spiro
Ronald H. Spiro Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jatin P. Shah
Jatin P. Shah Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Louis B. Harrison
Louis B. Harrison Moffitt Cancer Center
Andrew G. Huvos
Andrew G. Huvos Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Dennis H. Kraus
Dennis H. Kraus Northwell Health
Michael J. Zelefsky
Michael J. Zelefsky Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David G. Pfister
David G. Pfister Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
George J. Bosl
George J. Bosl Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Zvi Fuks
Zvi Fuks Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Ashok R. Shaha
Ashok R. Shaha Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to a diverse range of professional options beyond becoming a physician. For those seeking advanced practice roles, pursuing cheap online dnp programs can lead to becoming a nurse practitioner or clinical leader, often in a flexible, affordable format.

Pharmacy is another high-demand field with growing online opportunities. The 3 year online pharmd programs are especially attractive for students aiming to complete their Doctor of Pharmacy degree efficiently and with greater flexibility.

For those interested in the intersection of healthcare and information technology, a him bachelor's degree online offers training in managing health records and supporting healthcare systems, all through convenient online coursework.

In addition, medical billing and coding online courses cost significantly less than traditional degree programs, making this a cost-effective career pathway into the vital world of healthcare administration.

Best Scientists Citing Elliot W. Strong

Recently Published Articles