World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 98 8820 8278 4544 4203 370 42964

Douglas S. Reintgen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Douglas S. Reintgen between 1978 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Douglas S. Reintgen published across 44 years, from 1978 to 2021, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 1997. 2 of the 370 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 1997. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 8 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 7 publications 1992: 17 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 47 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 33 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 29 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications
1978 2021

370 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Douglas S. Reintgen: publications per year, 1978 to 2021
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 1
1980 2
1981 2
1982 1
1983 8
1984 7
1985 3
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1989 2
1990 1
1991 7
1992 17
1993 18
1994 8
1995 11
1996 15
1997 47
1998 20
1999 33
2000 19
2001 29
2002 16
2003 11
2004 12
2005 3
2006 13
2007 8
2008 5
2009 6
2010 16
2011 3
2012 4
2013 4
2014 1
2015 2
2016 4
2017 2
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 2
Total 370
Download as CSV

Douglas S. Reintgen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas S. Reintgen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 370 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 370
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Douglas S. Reintgen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas S. Reintgen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 98
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Douglas S. Reintgen is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on medicine, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, immunology, and microbiology.

Their scientific work covers key subfields including oncology, molecular biology, and immunology. These areas align with their main research themes, which include cutaneous melanoma detection and management, melanoma and MAPK pathways, and immunotherapy and immune responses.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled Current management of melanoma patients with nodal metastases, published in 2021 in the journal Clinical & Experimental Metastasis. This work has been cited multiple times, reflecting engagement from the academic community.

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Dale Han
  • Alexander C.J. van Akkooi
  • Richard J. Straker
  • Adrienne B. Shannon
  • Giorgos C. Karakousis

A notable publication venue for their work is Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, where they have contributed at least one paper.

Reintgen's expertise bridges clinical and molecular aspects of melanoma, emphasizing the biological mechanisms underlying the disease as well as therapeutic approaches, especially in the context of immune system interactions.

Best Publications

  • Final Version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma

    Charles M. Balch;Antonio C. Buzaid;Seng-Jaw Soong;Michael B. Atkins

  • Prognostic Factors Analysis of 17,600 Melanoma Patients: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System

    Charles M. Balch;Seng-Jaw Soong;Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;John F. Thompson

  • Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma

    Donald L. Morton;John F. Thompson;Alistair J. Cochran;Nicola Mozzillo

  • Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer

    John J. Albertini;Gary H. Lyman;Charles Cox;Tim Yeatman

  • Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients.

    Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;William Thompson;Paul F. Mansfield;Jeffrey E. Lee

  • Surgical Complications Associated With Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection (SLND) Plus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Compared With SLND Alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011

    Anthony Lucci;Linda Mackie McCall;Peter D. Beitsch;Patrick W. Whitworth

  • gp100 peptide vaccine and interleukin-2 in patients with advanced melanoma.

    Douglas J. Schwartzentruber;David H. Lawson;Jon M. Richards;Robert M. Conry

  • Validation of the Accuracy of Intraoperative Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for Early-Stage Melanoma: A Multicenter Trial

    Donald L. Morton;John F. Thompson;Richard Essner;Robert Elashoff

  • The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases.

    Douglas Reintgen;C. Cruse;Karen Wells;Claudia Berman

  • Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma - Accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial

    Donald L. Morton;Alistair J. Cochran;John F. Thompson;Robert Elashoff

  • Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer.

    Charles E. Cox;Solange Pendas;John M. Cox;Emmanuella Joseph

  • Intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy improves sentinel lymph node identification for patients with melanoma

    John Albertini;C. Cruse;David Rapaport;Karen Wells

  • Surgical Complications Associated With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Results From a Prospective International Cooperative Group Trial

    Lee Gravatt Wilke;Linda M. McCall;Katherine E. Posther;Pat W. Whitworth

  • Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumours by electrochemotherapy.

    LM Mir;LF Glass;G Sersa;J Teissié

  • An Evidence‐based Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma

    Charles M. Balch;Seng Jaw Soong;Michael B. Atkins;Antonio C. Buzaid

  • A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

    Charles M. Balch;Antonio C. Buzaid;Michael B. Atkins;Natale Cascinelli

  • Roles of activated Src and Stat3 signaling in melanoma tumor cell growth

    Guilian Niu;Tammy Bowman;Mei Huang;Steve Shivers

  • Sentinel-Lymph-Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer — Not Yet the Standard of Care

    K. M. McMasters;A. E. Giuliano;M. I. Ross;D. S. Reintgen

  • Molecular staging of malignant melanoma: correlation with clinical outcome.

    Steven C. Shivers;Xiangning Wang;Weiguo Li;Emmanuella Joseph

  • Influence of physician communication on newly diagnosed breast patients' psychologic adjustment and decision-making

    Cleora S. Roberts;Charles E. Cox;Douglas S. Reintgen;Walter F. Baile

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles E. Cox
Charles E. Cox University of South Florida
Merrick I. Ross
Merrick I. Ross The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Kelly M. McMasters
Kelly M. McMasters University of Louisville
Jane L. Messina
Jane L. Messina University of South Florida
Gary H. Lyman
Gary H. Lyman Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Hilliard F. Seigler
Hilliard F. Seigler Duke University
Michael J. Edwards
Michael J. Edwards University of Cincinnati
Alan B. Cantor
Alan B. Cantor Harvard University
Richard Heller
Richard Heller University of South Florida
Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
Jeffrey E. Gershenwald The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a traditional medical degree in the USA is just one way to enter the healthcare field. Many students and professionals are now considering alternative online degrees and specialized career pathways, which can offer flexibility, faster completion times, and a wider range of options beyond medicine.

For those interested in nutrition or wellness, an online dietitian degree can be a valuable stepping stone to a rewarding career in dietary counseling and nutrition education. If you are more drawn to healthcare management, there are cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs that prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and other medical organizations.

Nursing continues to offer multiple pathways as well. There are best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements available for practicing nurses seeking career advancement with minimal disruption. For those aiming for the highest level in clinical practice, the shortest dnp programs can help you earn your Doctor of Nursing Practice degree faster.

These accredited programs provide practical alternatives for students who want to make an impact in healthcare without following the traditional path to an MD.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas S. Reintgen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles