World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hilliard F. Seigler

Hilliard F. Seigler

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
28777
World Ranking
19289
National Ranking
9608

Hilliard F. Seigler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hilliard F. Seigler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 309 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hilliard F. Seigler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hilliard F. Seigler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hilliard F. Seigler is a researcher affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their scholarly activities are primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on specific subfields including Transplantation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Surgery.

Their research addresses several key topics related to organ transplantation, notably:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Seigler's publication record includes contributions to peer-reviewed journals, with a recent paper titled A Historical Cohort in Kidney Transplantation: 55-Year Follow-Up of 72 HLA-Identical, Donor-Recipient Pairs published in 2021 in the Journal of Clinical Medicine. This paper has been cited in academic literature multiple times since its release.

Their collaboration network comprises several frequent coauthors, including:

  • Brian I. Shaw
  • Vincenzo Villani
  • Samuel J. Kesseli
  • Chloe K. Nobuhara
  • Mariya L. Samoylova

The Journal of Clinical Medicine is a noted venue for their published work, representing the primary outlet within their recent contribution to the field.

Best Publications

  • Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer

    Helen Davies;Graham R. Bignell;Charles Cox;Philip Stephens

  • The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases.

    Douglas Reintgen;C. Cruse;Karen Wells;Claudia Berman

  • Demographics, prognosis, and therapy in 702 patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma

    John H. Sampson;James H. Carter;Allan H. Friedman;Hilliard F. Seigler

  • Preoperative Radiation and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum

    Ravi S. Chari;Douglas S. Tyler;Mitchell Steven Anscher;Linda Russell

  • The role of HLA class I antigens in recognition of melanoma cells by tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Evidence for shared tumor antigens.

    T L Darrow;C L Slingluff;H F Seigler

  • ANALYSIS OF 945 CASES OF PULMONARY METASTATIC MELANOMA

    David H. Harpole;Cheryl M. Johnson;Walter G. Wolfe;Stephen L. George

  • Lethal "thin" malignant melanoma. Identifying patients at risk.

    Craig L. Slingluff;Robin T. Vollmer;Douglas S. Reintgen;Hilliard F. Seigler

  • Melanoma, a tumor based on a mutant stem cell?

    James M. Grichnik;James A. Burch;Ryan D. Schulteis;Siqing Shan

  • Efficacy of elective lymph node dissection in patients with intermediate thickness primary melanoma.

    Douglas S. Reintgen;Edwin B. Cox;Kenneth S. McCARTY;Robin T. Vollmer

  • Improved survival with pulmonary metastasectomy: an analysis of 1720 patients with pulmonary metastatic melanoma.

    Rebecca P. Petersen;Steven I. Hanish;John C. Haney;Charles C. Miller

  • Late recurrence of malignant melanoma. Analysis of 168 patients.

    Nancy J. Crowley;Hilliard F. Seigler

  • Surgical Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Patients with Melanoma Experience with 4682 Patients

    Craig L. Slingluff;Katrina R. Stidham;William M. Ricci;Wilma E. Stanley

  • Radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical considerations of melanoma metastatic to the gastrointestinal tract.

    D S Reintgen;W Thompson;J Garbutt;H F Seigler

  • Detection of a pancreatic cancer-associated antigen (DU-PAN-2 antigen) in serum and ascites of patients with adenocarcinoma.

    Richard S. Metzgar;Ned Rodriguez;Olivera J. Finn;Michael S. Lan

  • Long-Term Survival in 2,505 Patients With Melanoma With Regional Lymph Node Metastasis

    Rebekah R. White;Wilma E. Stanley;Jeffrey L. Johnson;Douglas S. Tyler

  • Anorectal melanoma: clinical characteristics and results of surgical management in twenty-four patients.

    Slingluff Cl;Vollmer Rt;Seigler Hf

  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer: analysis of clinical outcomes from a 13-year institutional experience.

    Mark W. Onaitis;Robert B. Noone;Matthew Hartwig;Herbert Hurwitz

  • Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities

    Rebekah R. White;Terri J. Halperin;John A. Olson;Mary S. Soo

  • MHC-restricted recognition of autologous melanoma by tumor-specific cytotoxic T cells. Evidence for restriction by a dominant HLA-A allele.

    N J Crowley;T L Darrow;M A Quinn-Allen;H F Seigler

  • Malignant Melanoma in Black American and White American Populations: A Comparative Review

    Douglas S. Reintgen;Kenneth M. McCarty;Edwin Cox;Hilliard F. Seigler

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas S. Reintgen
Douglas S. Reintgen University of South Florida
Robin T. Vollmer
Robin T. Vollmer Duke University
Jeffrey L. Johnson
Jeffrey L. Johnson LAC+USC Medical Center
Craig L. Slingluff
Craig L. Slingluff University of Virginia
Charles M. Balch
Charles M. Balch The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Michael A. Morse
Michael A. Morse Duke University
Theodore N. Pappas
Theodore N. Pappas Duke University
Mitchell S. Anscher
Mitchell S. Anscher The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
John H. Sampson
John H. Sampson Duke University
Michael J. Borowitz
Michael J. Borowitz Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're aiming for a career in medicine or nursing, there are several flexible online pathways to consider. Many students begin their journey with nursing, and for those who already hold an RN license, rn to bsn programs offer a streamlined way to earn a Bachelor's degree without on-campus requirements.

For nurses seeking advanced roles, pursuing a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is a popular option. Today's online landscape includes shortest msn to dnp program options, allowing students to move quickly into leadership or clinical expertise roles.

Those looking for flexibility and convenience may consider dnp programs online, which cater to working professionals balancing education with other commitments.

If you are just starting out, becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse can be a great first step. You can enter the workforce faster through a fastest lpn program, then pursue further education at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Hilliard F. Seigler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles