World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
23919
World Ranking
4282
National Ranking
2092

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
24079
World Ranking
17511
National Ranking
8763

Clive R. Taylor publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clive R. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 359 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Clive R. Taylor D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clive R. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clive R. Taylor is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, notably Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Medicine, and Computer Science. The scientist has contributed extensively to subfields such as Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Oncology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, including:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis

Among recent publications directly involving Clive R. Taylor is "Milestones in Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology," published in 2020 in Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology.

The scientist has also been part of broader collaborative works, including:

  • "A deep learning image-based intrinsic molecular subtype classifier of breast tumors reveals tumor heterogeneity that may affect survival," 2020, Breast Cancer Research
  • "A Consortium for Analytic Standardization in Immunohistochemistry," 2022, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • "Immunohistochemistry Should Be Regulated as an Assay," 2023, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • "Non-basal subtype defined by FOXC1 expression as an independent predictor of capecitabine efficacy in the triple negative breast cancer GEICAM/2003-11_CIBOMA/2004-01 trial," 2024, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Taylor include Bharat Jasani, Ralf Huss, Miguel Martín, Tania Ray, and Carlos H. Barrios.

The scientist's work has been frequently published in the following venues:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • Breast Cancer Research
  • Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology
  • Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

Best Publications

  • Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

    Carolyn C. Compton;L. Peter Fielding;Lawrence J. Burgart;Barbara Conley

  • Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer

    Carolyn C. Compton;Carolyn C. Compton;L. Peter Fielding;Lawrence J. Burgart;Barbara Conley

  • Antigen Retrieval Immunohistochemistry: Past, Present, and Future

    Shan Rong Shi;Richard J. Cote;Clive R. Taylor

  • Antigen Retrieval Technique

    Shan-Rong Shi;Richard J. Cote;Clive R. Taylor

  • Elevated and Absent pRb Expression Is Associated with Bladder Cancer Progression and Has Cooperative Effects with p53

    Richard J. Cote;Matthew D. Dunn;Sunanda J. Chatterjee;John P. Stein

  • Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry under the influence of pH using monoclonal antibodies.

    S R Shi;S A Imam;L Young;R J Cote

  • Thrombospondin-1 Expression in Bladder Cancer: Association With p53 Alterations, Tumor Angiogenesis, and Tumor Progression

    Gary D. Grossfeld;David A. Ginsberg;John P. Stein;Bernard H. Bochner

  • Effect of p21WAF1/CIP1 Expression on Tumor Progression in Bladder Cancer

    John P. Stein;David A. Ginsberg;Gary D. Grossfeld;Sunanda J. Chatterjee

  • Antigen retrieval technique utilizing citrate buffer or urea solution for immunohistochemical demonstration of androgen receptor in formalin-fixed paraffin sections

    Shan-Rong Shi;B. Chaiwun;L. Young;R. J. Cote

  • Anaplastic large cell lymphoma occurring in women with breast implants: analysis of 173 cases.

    Garry S. Brody;Dennis Deapen;Clive R. Taylor;Lauren Pinter-Brown

  • Concordance for Hodgkin's disease in identical twins suggesting genetic susceptibility to the young-adult form of the disease

    Thomas M. Mack;Wendy Cozen;Darryl K. Shibata;Lawrence M. Weiss

  • Development of B-Cell Lymphoma in Homosexual Men Clinical and Immunologic Findings

    Alexandra M. Levine;Paul R. Meyer;Mark K. Begandy;John W. Parker

  • Strategies for improving the immunohistochemical staining of various intranuclear prognostic markers in formalin-paraffin sections: Androgen receptor, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53 protein, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and Ki-67 antigen revealed by antigen retrieval techniques

    Clive R. Taylor;Shan Rong Shi;Benjaporn Chaiwun;Lillian Young

  • Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).

    Sanjay Mukhopadhyay;Michael D. Feldman;Esther Abels;Raheela Ashfaq

  • Immunologic approach to non-Hodgkin lymphomas and related leukemias. Analysis of the results of multiparameter studies of 425 cases.

    Lukes Rj;Parker Jw;Taylor Cr;Tindle Bh

  • A microfluidic processor for gene expression profiling of single human embryonic stem cells

    Jiang F. Zhong;Jiang F. Zhong;Yan Chen;Joshua S. Marcus;Axel Scherer

  • DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections based on the antigen retrieval principle: heating under the influence of pH.

    Shan Rong Shi;Richard J. Cote;Lin Wu;Cheng Liu

  • Antigen Retrieval Immunohistochemistry Review and Future Prospects in Research and Diagnosis over Two Decades

    Shan-Rong Shi;Shan-Rong Shi;Yan Shi;Yan Shi;Clive R. Taylor;Clive R. Taylor

  • Protein extraction from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections: quality evaluation by mass spectrometry.

    Shan-Rong Shi;Cheng Liu;Brian M. Balgley;Cheng Lee

  • A morphologic and immunologic surface marker study of 299 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphomas and related leukemias.

    R. J. Lukes;Clive R. Taylor;J. V. Parker;Thomas L. Lincoln

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Cote
Richard J. Cote Washington University in St. Louis
Alan L. Epstein
Alan L. Epstein University of Southern California
Florence M. Hofman
Florence M. Hofman University of Southern California
Susan Groshen
Susan Groshen University of Southern California
Alexandra M. Levine
Alexandra M. Levine City Of Hope National Medical Center
Axel Scherer
Axel Scherer California Institute of Technology
Thomas H. Rea
Thomas H. Rea University of Southern California
Søren Nielsen
Søren Nielsen Aalborg University
Jason L. Hornick
Jason L. Hornick Brigham and Women's Hospital
Robert L. Modlin
Robert L. Modlin University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in expanding your studies beyond Biology and Biochemistry, many related online degree programs can help you launch or enhance a healthcare career. For those drawn to patient care, registered nurse online programs offer a flexible way to become a licensed RN, combining coursework with local clinical practice.

For a career focused on wellness and nutrition, a nutritionist degree online provides science-based training for roles in dietary planning, food safety, and community health.

Those aiming for leadership in healthcare administration can explore top online mha programs that are cahme accredited. These programs ensure a high standard of education for future healthcare managers and executives.

For nurses seeking the highest level of clinical expertise, a dnp online no clinicals program may be ideal, offering advanced coursework without extensive in-person requirements.

Each of these online degrees can open doors to specialized roles, increased job opportunities, and further graduate study in the life sciences and health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Clive R. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles