World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
10795
World Ranking
18273
National Ranking
7466

Thomas H. Rea publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Rea sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 127 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas H. Rea D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas H. Rea sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas H. Rea was affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their academic career involved research within that institution.

There is no available information on specific fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work directly linked to their research.

No records exist concerning recent publications, co-authors, or venues where Thomas H. Rea frequently published.

Similarly, there is no data on book publications or awards received by this scientist.

Thomas H. Rea is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Defining protective responses to pathogens: cytokine profiles in leprosy lesions

    Masahiro Yamamura;Koichi Uyemura;Robert J. Deans;Kenneth Weinberg

  • Lymphocytes bearing antigen-specific γδ T-cell receptors accumulate in human infectious disease lesions

    Robert. L. Modlin;Claude Pirmez;Florence M. Hofman;Victoria Torigian

  • TLR activation triggers the rapid differentiation of monocytes into macrophages and dendritic cells

    Stephan R Krutzik;Belinda Tan;Huiying Li;Maria Teresa Ochoa

  • Comparative genomic and phylogeographic analysis of Mycobacterium leprae

    Marc Monot;Nadine Honoré;Thierry Garnier;Nora Zidane

  • Activation and regulation of Toll-like receptors 2 and 1 in human leprosy.

    Stephan R. Krutzik;Maria Teresa Ochoa;Peter A. Sieling;Satoshi Uematsu

  • Type I Interferon Suppresses Type II Interferon–Triggered Human Anti-Mycobacterial Responses

    Rosane M. B. Teles;Thomas G. Graeber;Stephan R. Krutzik;Dennis Montoya

  • Langerhans cells utilize CD1a and langerin to efficiently present nonpeptide antigens to T cells

    Robert E. Hunger;Peter A. Sieling;Maria Teresa Ochoa;Makoto Sugaya

  • MicroRNA-21 targets the vitamin D-dependent antimicrobial pathway in leprosy

    Philip T Liu;Matthew Wheelwright;Rosane Teles;Evangelia Komisopoulou

  • Learning from lesions: patterns of tissue inflammation in leprosy

    Robert L. Modlin;Johanne Melancon-Kaplan;Summer M. M. Young;Claude Pirmez

  • Divergence of Macrophage Phagocytic and Antimicrobial Programs in Leprosy

    Dennis Montoya;Daniel Cruz;Rosane M.B. Teles;Delphine J. Lee

  • T-cell release of granulysin contributes to host defense in leprosy.

    Maria Teresa Ochoa;Steffen Stenger;Peter A. Sieling;Sybille Thoma-Uszynski

  • Expression of Toll-like receptor 2 on human Schwann cells: a mechanism of nerve damage in leprosy

    Rosane B. Oliveira;Maria T. Ochoa;Peter A. Sieling;Thomas H. Rea

  • Use of Genetic Profiling in Leprosy to Discriminate Clinical Forms of the Disease

    Joshua R. Bleharski;Huiying Li;Christoph Meinken;Thomas G. Graeber

  • CD1 EXPRESSION BY DENDRITIC CELLS IN HUMAN LEPROSY LESIONS : CORRELATION WITH EFFECTIVE HOST IMMUNITY

    Peter A. Sieling;Denis Jullien;Monica Dahlem;Thomas F. Tedder

  • Host-derived oxidized phospholipids and HDL regulate innate immunity in human leprosy.

    Daniel Cruz;Andrew D. Watson;Christopher S. Miller;Dennis Montoya

  • IL-18 promotes type 1 cytokine production from NK cells and T cells in human intracellular infection.

    Verónica E. García;Koichi Uyemura;Peter A. Sieling;María T. Ochoa

  • Genetically restricted suppressor T-cell clones derived from lepromatous leprosy lesions.

    Robert L. Modlin;Hideyuki Kato;Vijay Mehra;Erica E. Nelson

  • T lymphocyte subsets in the skin lesions of patients with leprosy

    Robert L. Modlin;Florence M. Hofman;Clive R. Taylor;Thomas H. Rea

  • NOD2 triggers an interleukin-32–dependent human dendritic cell program in leprosy

    Mirjam Schenk;Stephan R Krutzik;Peter A Sieling;Delphine J Lee

  • T Lymphocyte Subsets in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    Antony C. Bakke;Purnell A. Kirkland;Rodanthi C. Kitridou;Francisco P. Quismorio

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Modlin
Robert L. Modlin University of California, Los Angeles
Peter A. Sieling
Peter A. Sieling University of California, Los Angeles
Euzenir Nunes Sarno
Euzenir Nunes Sarno Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
Barry R. Bloom
Barry R. Bloom Harvard University
Clive R. Taylor
Clive R. Taylor University of Southern California
Florence M. Hofman
Florence M. Hofman University of Southern California
Patrick J. Brennan
Patrick J. Brennan Colorado State University
Thomas G. Graeber
Thomas G. Graeber University of California, Los Angeles
Genhong Cheng
Genhong Cheng University of California, Los Angeles
Steffen Stenger
Steffen Stenger University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a range of healthcare and science-related careers. Today, online programs offer fast, flexible options for students and working professionals to advance their education or shift career directions.

If your goal is to become a family nurse practitioner, you can consider a post masters np program for a streamlined path to licensure. Aspiring registered dietitians have access to some of the best online registered dietitian programs that balance affordability with comprehensive nutrition training.

Registered nurses wishing to build on their biology background can enroll in one of the online rn to bsn programs to expand their clinical knowledge and increase job prospects. Those who want to transition into healthcare administration and leadership might look at a fast online master's in healthcare management for rapid entry into advanced non-clinical roles.

By leveraging these flexible online pathways, students can enhance their skills, boost their credentials, and access rewarding careers connected to biology and biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas H. Rea

Recently Published Articles