World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3900 3597 58 57 360 11445

Massimo Clerici publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Massimo Clerici between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Massimo Clerici published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 52 publications in 2023. 53 of the 486 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 52. Peak 52 publications in 2023. 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 41 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 52 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 26 publications
1984 2025

486 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Massimo Clerici: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 3
1985 0
1986 6
1987 1
1988 4
1989 3
1990 4
1991 2
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 3
1997 0
1998 2
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 0
2003 3
2004 0
2005 0
2006 4
2007 2
2008 5
2009 8
2010 12
2011 6
2012 13
2013 38
2014 16
2015 36
2016 26
2017 41
2018 25
2019 22
2020 35
2021 30
2022 25
2023 52
2024 27
2025 26
Total 486
Download as CSV

Massimo Clerici publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Massimo Clerici sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 360 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 360
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Massimo Clerici D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Massimo Clerici sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Massimo Clerici is affiliated with the University of Milano-Bicocca in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with particular emphasis on clinical psychology and psychiatry and mental health. The scientist's work also extends into experimental and cognitive psychology, pharmacology, and social psychology.

The main topics covered by Massimo Clerici's research include:

  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors

Massimo Clerici has contributed to several papers in recent years. Selected works include:

  • "Mental Health in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Emergency-The Italian Response," 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Psychiatric emergency care during Coronavirus 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic lockdown: results from a Department of Mental Health and Addiction of northern Italy," 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • "Psychiatric hospitalization rates in Italy before and during COVID-19: did they change? An analysis of register data," 2020, Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine
  • "Real-world experience of esketamine use to manage treatment-resistant depression: A multicentric study on safety and effectiveness (REAL-ESK study)," 2022, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "Consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on admissions to general hospital psychiatric wards in Italy: Reduced psychiatric hospitalizations and increased suicidality," 2021, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

The scientist has frequently published in venues such as Neuroscience Applied, European Neuropsychopharmacology, PubMed, Journal of Personalized Medicine, and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Massimo Clerici collaborates regularly with several researchers. Common coauthors include Enrico Capuzzi, Massimiliano Buoli, Alice Caldiroli, Fabrizia Colmegna, and Antonios Dakanalis.

Best Publications

  • Mental health of prisoners: prevalence, adverse outcomes, and interventions

    Seena Fazel;Adrian J Hayes;Katrina Bartellas;Massimo Clerici

  • Reducing the treatment gap for mental disorders: a WPA survey.

    Vikram Patel;Mario Maj;Alan J Flisher;Mary J De Silva

  • Disentangling the Association Between Child Abuse and Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Manuela Caslini;Francesco Bartoli;Cristina Crocamo;Antonios Dakanalis

  • Depression after Stroke and Risk of Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    F Bartoli;N Lillia;A Lax;C Crocamo

  • Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio in mood disorders: A meta-analysis.

    Mario Gennaro Mazza;Sara Lucchi;Agnese Grazia Maria Tringali;Aurora Rossetti

  • The developmental effects of media-ideal internalization and self-objectification processes on adolescents’ negative body-feelings, dietary restraint, and binge eating

    Antonios Dakanalis;Giuseppe Carrà;Rachel Calogero;Roberta Fida

  • Estimating the Risk of Attempted Suicide Among Sexual Minority Youths: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Ester di Giacomo;Micheal Krausz;Fabrizia Colmegna;Flora Aspesi

  • Mental Health in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Emergency-The Italian Response.

    Giovanni de Girolamo;Giancarlo Cerveri;Massimo Clerici;Emiliano Monzani

  • Cytokines production in chronic schizophrenia patients with or without paranoid behaviour

    Carlo L. Cazzullo;Silvio Scarone;Barbara Grassi;Chiara Vismara

  • Italian version of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire. Psychometric proprieties and measurement invariance across sex, BMI-status and age

    Antonios Dakanalis;M. Assunta Zanetti;Massimo Clerici;Fabio Madeddu

  • A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Second-Level Treatment Approaches for Treatment-Resistant Adults with Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder: Assessing the Benefits of Virtual Reality Cue Exposure Therapy

    Marta Ferrer-García;José Gutiérrez-Maldonado;Joana Pla-Sanjuanelo;Ferran Vilalta-Abella

  • Acute variations of cytokine levels after antipsychotic treatment in drug-naïve subjects with a first-episode psychosis: A meta-analysis.

    Enrico Capuzzi;Francesco Bartoli;Cristina Crocamo;Massimo Clerici

  • Attachment insecurities, maladaptive perfectionism, and eating disorder symptoms: A latent mediated and moderated structural equation modeling analysis across diagnostic groups

    Antonios Dakanalis;Antonios Dakanalis;C. Alix Timko;M. Assunta Zanetti;Lucio Rinaldi

  • Male body dissatisfaction and eating disorder symptomatology: Moderating variables among men

    Antonios Dakanalis;Assunta M Zanetti;Giuseppe Riva;Fabrizia Colmegna

  • Early Post-stroke Depression and Mortality: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.

    Francesco Bartoli;Carmen Di Brita;Cristina Crocamo;Massimo Clerici

  • Attempted suicide in people with co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Giuseppe Carrà;Francesco Bartoli;Cristina Crocamo;Kathleen T. Brady

  • Risk and maintenance factors for young women's DSM-5 eating disorders.

    Antonios Dakanalis;Antonios Dakanalis;Massimo Clerici;Francesco Beghella Bartoli;Manuela Caslini

  • Psychiatric emergency care during Coronavirus 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic lockdown: results from a Department of Mental Health and Addiction of northern Italy.

    Enrico Capuzzi;Carmen Di Brita;Alice Caldiroli;Fabrizia Colmegna

  • Metabolic syndrome in people suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Francesco Bartoli;Giuseppe Carrà;Cristina Crocamo;Daniele Carretta

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonios Dakanalis
Antonios Dakanalis University of Milano-Bicocca
Giuseppe Riva
Giuseppe Riva Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Giovanni de Girolamo
Giovanni de Girolamo Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
C. Alix Timko
C. Alix Timko Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Giovanni Martinotti
Giovanni Martinotti University of Chieti-Pescara
Silvia Serino
Silvia Serino University of Milano-Bicocca
Silvio Scarone
Silvio Scarone University of Milan
Bernardo Dell'Osso
Bernardo Dell'Osso University of Milan
Marc N. Potenza
Marc N. Potenza Yale University
Bernardo Carpiniello
Bernardo Carpiniello University of Cagliari

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open the door to a wide range of careers, both within psychology and in related fields such as social work, counseling, and human services. As demand for mental health professionals and support services continues to grow, many students are exploring online degree options to gain the necessary skills conveniently.

Numerous universities now offer flexible programs that allow you to specialize and advance your education entirely online. If you’re interested in broadening your career options, consider exploring some of the top online social work degrees in Massachusetts or the best online social work degrees in the Northeast. These programs provide the foundation for roles such as licensed clinical social worker, case manager, or mental health advocate.

For those in specific regions, there are also excellent options like the best online social work degree programs in New Hampshire and best online social work programs in Ohio. Completing these programs online helps students balance work and personal commitments while preparing for diverse career pathways in psychology, social work, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Massimo Clerici

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles