World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7695
World Ranking
8181
National Ranking
4383

Anna M. Bardone-Cone publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna M. Bardone-Cone sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anna M. Bardone-Cone D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna M. Bardone-Cone sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna M. Bardone-Cone is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research contributions are concentrated primarily within the field of Psychology, with a strong emphasis on Clinical Psychology. Their work extensively addresses eating disorders and related behavioral and psychological health issues.

Their publication record reveals a focus on topics related to eating disorders and behaviors, body image and dysmorphia studies, obesity, physical activity, and diet. They also engage in research concerning the impact of technology on adolescents, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, obesity and health practices, and menstrual health and disorders.

Frequent publication venues for their work include UNC Libraries, Eating Behaviors, International Journal of Eating Disorders, as well as Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity, and Body Image. These journals reflect the recurring themes of their research on disordered eating patterns and body image concerns.

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Does the tripartite influence model of body image and eating pathology function similarly across racial/ethnic groups of White, Black, Latina, and Asian women?" (2021, Eating Behaviors)
  • "Comparing eating disorder characteristics and treatment in self-identified competitive athletes and non-athletes from the National Eating Disorders Association online screening tool" (2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders)
  • "Body appreciation and intuitive eating in eating disorder recovery" (2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders)
  • "Subjective binge eating: a marker of disordered eating and broader psychological distress" (2020, Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity)
  • "Impulsivity and anxiety-related dimensions in adults with bulimic-spectrum disorders differentially relate to eating disordered behaviors" (2020, Eating Behaviors)

Bardone-Cone collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft, Katherine A. Thompson, Stephen A. Wonderlich, Ross D. Crosby, and Cynthia M. Bulik. These collaborations underline a connected research network centered on clinical and behavioral aspects of eating disorders.

Best Publications

  • Perfectionism and eating disorders: current status and future directions.

    Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Stephen A. Wonderlich;Randy O. Frost;Cynthia M. Bulik

  • Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4).

    Lauren M. Schaefer;Natasha L. Burke;J. Kevin Thompson;Robert F. Dedrick

  • Psychometric properties of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire: factor structure and internal consistency.

    Carol B. Peterson;Ross D. Crosby;Stephen A. Wonderlich;Thomas Joiner

  • Defining recovery from an eating disorder: Conceptualization, validation, and examination of psychosocial functioning and psychiatric comorbidity

    Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Megan B. Harney;Christine R. Maldonado;Melissa A. Lawson

  • What does viewing a pro-anorexia website do? An experimental examination of website exposure and moderating effects.

    Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Kamila M. Cass

  • Explaining the relation between thin ideal internalization and body dissatisfaction among college women: the roles of social comparison and body surveillance.

    Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft;Megan Beth Harney;Laura G. Koehler;Lauren E. Danzi

  • Personality subtyping and bulimia nervosa: psychopathological and genetic correlates

    Stephen A. Wonderlich;Ross D. Crosby;Thomas Joiner;Carol B. Peterson

  • An Overview of Conceptualizations of Eating Disorder Recovery, Recent Findings, and Future Directions.

    Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Rowan A. Hunt;Hunna J. Watson

  • Self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism dimensions and their associations with disordered eating.

    Anna M. Bardone-Cone

  • Predicting bulimic symptoms: an interactive model of self-efficacy, perfectionism, and perceived weight status.

    A. M. Bardone-Cone;L. Y. Abramson;K. D. Vohs;T. F. Heatherton

  • Investigating the impact of pro‐anorexia websites: a pilot study

    Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Kamila M. Cass

  • Exercise caution: Over-exercise is associated with suicidality among individuals with disordered eating

    April R. Smith;Erin L. Fink;Michael D. Anestis;Jessica D. Ribeiro

  • Psychometric Properties of Eating Disorder Instruments in Black and White Young Women: Internal Consistency, Temporal Stability, and Validity

    Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Clarissa A. Boyd

  • Perfectionism across stages of recovery from eating disorders

    Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Katrina Sturm;Melissa A. Lawson;D. Paul Robinson

  • DSM-IV threshold versus subthreshold bulimia nervosa.

    Daniel Le Grange;Roslyn B. Binford;Carol B. Peterson;Scott J. Crow

  • The inter-relationships between vegetarianism and eating disorders among females.

    Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft;Megan B. Harney;Christine R. Maldonado

  • Impulsivity and compulsivity in bulimia nervosa.

    Scott G. Engel;Stephanie J. Corneliussen;Stephen A. Wonderlich;Ross D. Crosby

  • Examining an elaborated sociocultural model of disordered eating among college women: the roles of social comparison and body surveillance.

    Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft;Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Cynthia M. Bulik;Stephen A. Wonderlich

  • Development and validation of the Body, Eating, and Exercise Comparison Orientation Measure (BEECOM) among college women.

    Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft;Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Megan B. Harney

  • Affective lability and impulsivity in a clinical sample of women with bulimia nervosa: The role of affect in severely dysregulated behavior

    Michael D. Anestis;Carol B. Peterson;Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Marjorie H. Klein

  • Objectified body consciousness in relation to recovery from an eating disorder

    Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft;Anna M. Bardone-Cone;Kathleen A. Kelly

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas E. Joiner
Thomas E. Joiner Florida State University
Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft
Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft Washington University in St. Louis
Stephen A. Wonderlich
Stephen A. Wonderlich University of North Dakota
Ross D. Crosby
Ross D. Crosby University of North Dakota
James E. Mitchell
James E. Mitchell University of North Dakota
Cynthia M. Bulik
Cynthia M. Bulik University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Scott J. Crow
Scott J. Crow University of Minnesota
Daniel Le Grange
Daniel Le Grange University of California, San Francisco
Marjorie H. Klein
Marjorie H. Klein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Carol B. Peterson
Carol B. Peterson University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a wide range of career opportunities and specializations across the United States. Whether you’re just starting out or looking to advance your current role, selecting the right program can make a significant difference in future prospects.

For those interested in diverse options, the popular psychology degrees in Fort Worth highlight programs with strong student support and flexible learning formats. Meanwhile, students seeking academic prestige may want to consider the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Kent, which are well-regarded for research opportunities and faculty expertise.

The most popular psychology degree programs in Las Vegas focus on practical skills and career readiness, preparing graduates for both clinical and non-clinical roles. For those aiming to pursue counseling or mental health careers, the most popular psychology degree programs in Nashville offer a range of concentrations and online pathways to suit various interests.

No matter where you choose to study, online psychology programs provide flexible options to access quality education and a fulfilling career in a growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Anna M. Bardone-Cone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles