World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
6719
World Ranking
7315
National Ranking
3953

Mark R. Dixon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Dixon sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 245 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark R. Dixon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Dixon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark R. Dixon is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their published work covers a variety of topics including behavioral and psychological studies, autism spectrum disorder research, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, family and disability support research, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, mindfulness and compassion interventions, and bullying, victimization, and aggression.

Frequent publication venues for Mark R. Dixon include Behavior Analysis in Practice, the Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, the Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, and Neuromuscular Disorders.

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Glofitamab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx) versus rituximab-GemOx for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (STARGLO): a global phase 3, randomised, open-label trial" (2024, The Lancet)
  • "Glofitamab for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma" (2022, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Report of the ACBS Task Force on the strategies and tactics of contextual behavioral science research" (2021, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science)
  • "Developing and Enhancing Adherence to a Telehealth ABA Parent Training Curriculum for Caregivers of Children with Autism" (2020, Behavior Analysis in Practice)
  • "Relational Density Theory: Nonlinearity of Equivalence Relating Examined through Higher-Order Volumetric-Mass-Density" (2020, Perspectives on Behavior Science)

Frequent co-authors include Zhihui Yi, Jordan Belisle, Jessica M. Hinman, Dana Paliliunas, and Steven C. Hayes.

Best Publications

  • Delay discounting by pathological gamblers.

    Mark R. Dixon;Janice Marley;Eric A. Jacobs

  • Contextual control of delay discounting by pathological gamblers.

    Mark R. Dixon;Eric A. Jacobs;Scott Sanders

  • Using a Self-Control Training Procedure To Increase Appropriate Behavior.

    Mark R. Dixon;Linda J. Hayes;Lisa M. Binder;Sharon Manthey

  • NEAR-MISS EFFECTS ON RESPONSE LATENCIES AND WIN ESTIMATIONS OF SLOT MACHINE PLAYERS

    Mark R. Dixon;James E. Schreiber

  • NEUROBEHAVIORAL EVIDENCE FOR THE “NEAR‐MISS” EFFECT IN PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS

    Reza Habib;Mark R. Dixon

  • A procedure to teach self-control to children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

    Lisa M. Binder;Mark R. Dixon;Patrick M. Ghezzi

  • Manipulating the Illusion of Control: Variations in Gambling as a Function of Perceived Control over Chance Outcomes

    Mark R. Dixon

  • Self-control in children with autism: response allocation during delays to reinforcement.

    Mark R. Dixon;Anne Cummings

  • Report of the ACBS Task Force on the strategies and tactics of contextual behavioral science research

    Steven C. Hayes;Rhonda M. Merwin;Louise McHugh;Emily K. Sandoz

  • CREATING SINGLE‐SUBJECT DESIGN GRAPHS IN MICROSOFT EXCEL™ 2007

    Mark R. Dixon;James W. Jackson;Stacey L. Small;Mollie J. Horner-King

  • Modification of slot-machine preferences through the use of a conditional discrimination paradigm.

    Kimberly R. Zlomke;Mark R. Dixon

  • Using a computer simulation of three slot machines to investigate a gambler's preference among varying densities of near-miss alternatives.

    Otrro H MacLin;Mark R Dixon;Dustin Daugherty;Stacey L Small

  • Examining the Roles of Rule Following, Reinforcement, and Preexperimental Histories on Risk-Taking Behavior

    Mark R. Dixon;Linda J. Hayes;Immaculada B. Aban

  • Effects of Differing Instructional Histories on the Resurgence Of Rule-Following

    Mark R. Dixon;Linda J. Hayes

  • Enhancing tolerance to delayed reinforcers: the role of intervening activities.

    Mark R. Dixon;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt;Lysette Randich

  • The Gambling Functional Assessment (GFA): An Assessment Device for Identification of the Maintaining Variables of Pathological Gambling

    Mark R. Dixon;Taylor E. Johnson

  • Teaching self-control to small groups of dually diagnosed adults.

    Mark R. Dixon;Sharon Holcomb

  • Toward an Integrative Behavioral Model of Gambling

    Jeffrey N. Weatherly;Mark R. Dixon

  • FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS AND TREATMENT OF INAPPROPRIATE VERBAL BEHAVIOR

    Mark R. Dixon;Heather Benedict;Tracy Larson

  • Almost winning: Induced MEG theta power in insula and orbitofrontal cortex increases during gambling near-misses and is associated with BOLD signal and gambling severity

    Simon Dymond;Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Natalia Sophie Lawrence;Benjamin Dunkley;Kenneth S. L. Yuen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth Anne Rehfeldt
Ruth Anne Rehfeldt The Chicago School of Professional Psychology
Simon Dymond
Simon Dymond Swansea University
Reza Habib
Reza Habib Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Derek D. Reed
Derek D. Reed University of Kansas
Tristram Smith
Tristram Smith University of Rochester Medical Center
Natalia Lawrence
Natalia Lawrence University of Exeter
Bryan Roche
Bryan Roche National University of Ireland, Maynooth
W. Miles Cox
W. Miles Cox Bangor University
Joel Myerson
Joel Myerson Washington University in St. Louis
Leonard Green
Leonard Green Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and career pathways. One growing field is substance abuse counseling, which often requires specialized training and certification in addition to a psychology background.

Requirements can vary by location. For example, those interested in learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Boston must meet state-specific licensure and education criteria. Similarly, Buffalo substance abuse counselor certification requirements may include supervised fieldwork and certification exams.

Those in other regions will want to explore local guidelines, such as how to become a substance abuse counselor in Chandler or substance abuse counselor requirements in Charlotte. Many online psychology programs provide the foundational courses necessary for these careers, allowing for flexibility while you pursue your qualifications.

Whether you are just starting your journey or want to specialize in substance abuse counseling, researching local requirements and accredited online programs is key to success in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R. Dixon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles