World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9570 8951 5062 4617 118 4906

Ruth Anne Rehfeldt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ruth Anne Rehfeldt between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ruth Anne Rehfeldt published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2003. 5 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2003. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 9 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1997 2025

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ruth Anne Rehfeldt: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 5
1999 2
2000 4
2001 1
2002 1
2003 9
2004 7
2005 9
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 4
2010 3
2011 4
2012 7
2013 2
2014 8
2015 8
2016 4
2017 3
2018 4
2019 7
2020 5
2021 7
2022 2
2023 3
2024 3
2025 2
Total 125
Download as CSV

Ruth Anne Rehfeldt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Anne Rehfeldt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 118
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ruth Anne Rehfeldt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Anne Rehfeldt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ruth Anne Rehfeldt is affiliated with The Chicago School of Professional Psychology in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a particular emphasis on developmental and educational psychology, general health professions, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, and applied psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work include behavioral and psychological studies, community health and development, behavioral health and interventions, neuroscience and music perception, mindfulness and compassion interventions, health policy implementation science, and autism spectrum disorder research.

Rehfeldt has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed papers. Notable publications include:

  • "Towards a Modern-Day Teaching Machine: The Synthesis of Programmed Instruction and Online Education," 2020, published in The Psychological Record
  • "Music as a Cultural Inheritance System: A Contextual-Behavioral Model of Symbolism, Meaning, and the Value of Music," 2021, published in Behavior and Social Issues
  • "Collective Editorial: Ten Guidelines for Strategic Social Action," 2020, published in Behavior and Social Issues
  • "Editorial: Rendezvous With Truth and Discovery," 2020, published in Behavior and Social Issues
  • "Why We Are Not Acting to Save Ourselves: ACT, Health, and Culture," 2021, published in Behavior Analysis in Practice

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Rehfeldt include Mark A. Mattaini, Richard F. Rakos, Stephanie C. Chan, Traci M. Cihon, and Brian D. Katz. These professional relationships indicate consistent partnerships on various research projects.

Rehfeldt's work has appeared most often in the following publication venues:

  • Behavior and Social Issues
  • Perspectives on Behavior Science
  • Behavior Analysis in Practice
  • The Psychological Record
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Best Publications

  • Understanding complex behavior: the transformation of stimulus functions.

    Simon Dymond;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • Evaluating Stress Levels of Parents of Children with Disabilities

    Beth M. Lessenberry;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • Derived relational responding : applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities : a progressive guide to change

    Ruth Anne Rehfeldt;Yvonne Barnes-Holmes

  • Assessing Relational Learning Deficits in Perspective-Taking in Children with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Ruth Anne Rehfeldt;Jeffrey E. Dillen;Megan M. Ziomek;Rhonda K. Kowalchuk

  • TOWARD A TECHNOLOGY OF DERIVED STIMULUS RELATIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1992–2009

    Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • THE EFFECTS OF BEHAVIORAL SKILLS TRAINING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PICTURE EXCHANGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

    Rocio Rosales;Karen Stone;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • Using video modeling to teach a domestic skill with an embedded social skill to adults with severe mental retardation

    Melissa A. Bidwell;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • Teaching a simple meal preparation skill to adults with moderate and severe mental retardation using video modeling.

    Ruth Anne Rehfeldt;Dana Dahman;Amanda Young;Hollie Cherry

  • Contriving transitive conditioned establishing operations to establish derived manding skills in adults with severe developmental disabilities.

    Rocio Rosales;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • Evaluation of the iPad in the acquisition of requesting skills for children with autism spectrum disorder

    Melissa L. King;Kazu Takeguchi;Shaina E. Barry;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • Assessing the acquisition and generalization of two mand forms with adults with severe developmental disabilities.

    Mark Chambers;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • Teaching Perspective-Taking Skills to Typically Developing Children through Derived Relational Responding

    Amie I. Heagle;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • ESTABLISHING DERIVED REQUESTING SKILLS IN ADULTS WITH SEVERE DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

    Ruth Anne Rehfeldt;Shannon L. Root

  • Functional analysis and treatment of verbal perseverations displayed by an adult with autism.

    Ruth Anne Rehfeldt;Mark R. Chambers

  • AN EVALUATION OF THE STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE PARADIGM TO TEACH SINGLE-SUBJECT DESIGN TO DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS VIA BLACKBOARD

    Brooke D. Walker;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • Facilitating requesting skills using high-tech augmentative and alternative communication devices with individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review

    Katharine Still;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt;Robert Whelan;Richard May

  • Enhancing tolerance to delayed reinforcers: the role of intervening activities.

    Mark R. Dixon;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt;Lysette Randich

  • Using stimulus equivalence technology to teach emotion recognition to adults with acquired brain injury

    John M Guercio;Hanna Podolska-Schroeder;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • Emergent Intraverbal Responses VIA Tact and Match-to-Sample Instruction.

    Leigh Grannan;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

  • Terrorism and Relational Frame Theory

    Mark R. Dixon;Simon Dymond;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt;Bryan Roche

  • Effects of multiple exemplar training on the emergence of derived relations in preschool children learning a second language.

    Rocio Rosales;Ruth Anne Rehfeldt;Sadie Lovett

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark R. Dixon
Mark R. Dixon University of Illinois at Chicago
Simon Dymond
Simon Dymond Swansea University
Bryan Roche
Bryan Roche National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Robert Whelan
Robert Whelan Trinity College Dublin
Yvonne Barnes-Holmes
Yvonne Barnes-Holmes Ireland Consulting Psychologists Ltd
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
Dermot Barnes-Holmes University of Ulster
Tomas E. Ward
Tomas E. Ward Dublin City University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online learning opportunities and career pathways. Many students opt for online master’s programs in counseling, which offer flexibility for working professionals and busy students. Comparing Pennsylvania online master's in counseling program rankings is a helpful starting point if you are interested in programs in the Northeast.

For a broader overview, the America online master's in counseling program rankings provide a national perspective on quality, affordability, and flexibility, making it easier to find a program that matches your goals.

If you are considering studying in a specific region, check out the best online counseling degree programs ranking in Texas for top choices in the South. Alternatively, for those seeking less rigorous admissions requirements, the easiest online counseling programs in California might offer the access you need to start your career.

Online degrees in counseling and psychology can lead to rewarding careers in mental health, schools, or private practice—making flexible, regionally tailored education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth Anne Rehfeldt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles