World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 7016 6543 14 14 144 6982

Louise McHugh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Louise McHugh between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Louise McHugh published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 13 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 2004: 8 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 2 publications
2004 2026

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Louise McHugh: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 8
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 8
2009 3
2010 9
2011 7
2012 7
2013 9
2014 4
2015 5
2016 5
2017 10
2018 4
2019 8
2020 14
2021 23
2022 20
2023 17
2024 13
2025 11
2026 2
Total 192
Download as CSV

Louise McHugh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise McHugh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 144 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 144
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Louise McHugh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise McHugh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Louise McHugh is affiliated with University College Dublin in Ireland and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology with a focus on various subfields including clinical psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The primary areas of research for McHugh encompass mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, mindfulness and compassion interventions, anxiety and depression, psychometrics, treatment and cognitive processes, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, advanced radiotherapy techniques, behavioral and psychological studies, as well as resilience and mental health.

Several notable publications illustrate McHugh's research trajectory, including:

  • Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: An international study (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries (2021, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships)
  • Report of the ACBS Task Force on the strategies and tactics of contextual behavioral science research (2021, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science)
  • The Dynamics of Fear at the Time of Covid-19: A Contextual Behavioral Science Perspective. (2020, PubMed)
  • Increased Psychological Distress during COVID-19 and Quarantine in Ireland: A National Survey (2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine)

Frequent collaboration with other researchers is evident through coauthorship with:

  • Maria Karekla (18 publications)
  • Alison Stapleton (16 publications)
  • Andrew T. Gloster (15 publications)
  • Angelos P. Kassianos (13 publications)
  • Marios Constantinou (12 publications)

McHugh's work is regularly published in specific journals, showing strong engagement with certain academic communities. Key publication venues include:

  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (21 publications)
  • Radiotherapy and Oncology (7 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (4 publications)
  • Frontiers in Psychology (3 publications)
  • The Psychological Record (3 publications)

The academic output spans 133 publications predominantly in psychology, with a considerable number addressing clinical psychological topics.

Best Publications

  • Parenting Stress Reduces the Effectiveness of Early Teaching Interventions for Autistic Spectrum Disorders.

    Lisa A. Osborne;Louise McHugh;Jo Saunders;Phil Reed

  • Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: An international study.

    Andrew T. Gloster;Demetris Lamnisos;Jelena Lubenko;Giovambattista Presti

  • Perspective-Taking as Relational Responding: A Developmental Profile

    Louise McHugh;Yvonne Barnes-Holmes;Dermot Barnes-Holmes

  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): Advances and Applications with Children, Adolescents, and Families

    Lisa W. Coyne;Louise McHugh;Evan R. Martinez

  • Perspective-Taking and Theory of Mind: A Relational Frame Account.

    Yvonne Barnes-Holmes;Louise McHugh;Dermot Barnes-Holmes

  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Reduces Psychological Stress in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

    Brona Wynne;Louise McHugh;Wei Gao;Denise Keegan

  • Relational Frame Theory: Some Implications for Understanding and Treating Human Psychopathology

    Yvonne Barnes-Holmes;Dermot Barnes-Holmes;Louise McHugh;Steven C. Hayes

  • Comparing thought suppression and acceptance as coping techniques for food cravings.

    Nic Hooper;Emily K. Sandoz;Jennifer Ashton;Amelia Clarke

  • The effect of parenting behaviors on subsequent child behavior problems in Autistic Spectrum Conditions

    Lisa A. Osborne;Louise McHugh;Jo Saunders;Phil Reed

  • Using Brief Cognitive Restructuring and Cognitive Defusion Techniques to Cope With Negative Thoughts

    Andreas Larsson;Andreas Larsson;Nic Hooper;Lisa A. Osborne;Paul Bennett

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy.

    Lisa W. Coyne;Kirstin B. Birtwell;Louise McHugh;Kelly G. Wilson

  • The dynamics of fear at the time of COVID-19: A contextual behavioral science perspective

    Giovambattista Presti;Louise McHugh;Andrew Gloster;Maria Karekla

  • Temporal Discounting of Hypothetical Monetary Rewards by Adolescents, Adults, and Older Adults

    Robert Whelan;Louise A. McHugh

  • To Help or Not to Help? Prosocial Behavior, Its Association With Well-Being, and Predictors of Prosocial Behavior During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic

    Unknown

  • Assessing Deictic Relational Responding in Social Anhedonia: A Functional Approach to the Development of Theory of Mind Impairments.

    Matthieu Villatte;Jean-Louis Monestes;Louise McHugh;Esteve Freixa i Baque

  • A Relational Frame Account of the Development of Complex Cognitive Phenomena: Perspective-taking, False Belief Understanding, and Deception

    Louise McHugh;Yvonne Barnes-Holmes;Dermot Barnes-Holmes

  • Assessing Perspective Taking in Schizophrenia Using Relational Frame Theory

    Matthieu Villatte;Jean-Louis Monestes;Louise McHugh;Esteve Freixa i Baque

  • Adopting the perspective of another in belief attribution: contribution of Relational Frame Theory to the understanding of impairments in schizophrenia.

    Matthieu Villatte;Jean-Louis Monestès;Louise McHugh;Esteve Freixa i Baqué

  • Perspective taking reduces the fundamental attribution error

    Nic Hooper;Ates Erdogan;Georgia Keen;Katharine Lawton

  • The derived generalization of thought suppression

    Nic Hooper;Jo Saunders;Louise McHugh

  • Relational Frame Theory: Some Implications for Understanding and Treating

    Yvonne Barnes-Holmes;Dermot Barnes-Holmes;Louise McHugh;Steven C. Hayes

Frequent Co-Authors

Phil Reed
Phil Reed Swansea University
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
Dermot Barnes-Holmes University of Ulster
Yvonne Barnes-Holmes
Yvonne Barnes-Holmes Ireland Consulting Psychologists Ltd
Robert Whelan
Robert Whelan Trinity College Dublin
Maria Karekla
Maria Karekla University of Cyprus
Andrew T. Gloster
Andrew T. Gloster University of Lucerne
Raimo Lappalainen
Raimo Lappalainen University of Jyväskylä
Steven C. Hayes
Steven C. Hayes University of Nevada Reno
Alan Carr
Alan Carr University College Dublin
Vasilis Vasiliou
Vasilis Vasiliou Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to many rewarding careers, especially in mental health counseling. As the demand for qualified counselors rises across the United States, online degrees have become a flexible and accessible launchpad into the profession.

While general pathways to becoming a mental health counselor share similarities, state and city-specific requirements can differ significantly. For example, those looking to become a mental health counselor in Pittsburgh will need to consider Pennsylvania’s licensing standards, which may differ from those required to become a mental health counselor in Plano, where Texas has its own unique certification process.

In other locations, such as Port St. Lucie or Portland, students should research local guidelines and specialized training. For instance, Port St. Lucie mental health counselor certification requirements and Portland mental health counselor certification requirements outline distinct steps and educational benchmarks.

Before enrolling in an online psychology program, it’s crucial to understand your target state’s licensing process. This ensures your degree and practicum experience will meet professional standards, paving the way for a successful counseling career wherever you choose to work.

Best Scientists Citing Louise McHugh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles