World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
5364
World Ranking
6779
National Ranking
3670

M. Paz Galupo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Paz Galupo sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

M. Paz Galupo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Paz Galupo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

M. Paz Galupo is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions to subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, gender studies, sociology and political science, and reproductive medicine.

Their work addresses multiple topics related to gender, sexuality, and health, including LGBTQ health, identity, and policy; sexuality, behavior, and technology; gender roles and identity studies; gender, feminism, and media; eating disorders and behaviors; reproductive health and technologies; and media, gender, and advertising.

Recent publications by M. Paz Galupo include:

  • "Gender dysphoria and minority stress: Support for inclusion of gender dysphoria as a proximal stressor," 2020, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • ""There Is Nothing to Do About It": Nonbinary Individuals' Experience of Gender Dysphoria," 2020, Transgender Health
  • ""Better issues to focus on": Transgender Microaggressions as Ethical Violations in Therapy," 2020, The Counseling Psychologist
  • ""Being Talked to Like I Was a Sex Toy, Like Being Transgender Was Simply for the Enjoyment of Someone Else": Fetishization and Sexualization of Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals," 2021, Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • ""Having a non-normative body for me is about survival": Androgynous body ideal among trans and nonbinary individuals," 2021, Body Image

M. Paz Galupo frequently collaborates with several scholars, including Louis Lindley, Annalisa Anzani, Claire E. Cusack, Em Matsuno, and Zakary A. Clements. These co-authors have appeared alongside Galupo across multiple published works.

Their research is often published in venues such as Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, The Journal of Sex Research, Transgender Health, Archives of Sexual Behavior, and Sexuality Research and Social Policy, indicating a strong focus on sexual and gender minority health and social issues.

Recognition of their professional standing includes being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Conceptualization of Sexual Orientation Identity Among Sexual Minorities: Patterns Across Sexual and Gender Identity

    M. Paz Galupo;Kyle S. Davis;Ashley L. Grynkiewicz;Renae C. Mitchell

  • Sexual minority self-identification: Multiple identities and complexity.

    M. Paz Galupo;Renae C. Mitchell;Kyle S. Davis

  • “Regardless of Their Gender”: Descriptions of Sexual Identity among Bisexual, Pansexual, and Queer Identified Individuals

    M. Paz Galupo;Johanna L. Ramirez;Lexi Pulice-Farrow

  • Transgender microaggressions in the context of friendship: Patterns of experience across friends’ sexual orientation and gender identity.

    M. Paz Galupo;Shane B. Henise;Kyle S. Davis

  • “The labels don't work very well”: Transgender individuals' conceptualizations of sexual orientation and sexual identity

    M. Paz Galupo;Shane B. Henise;Nicholas L. Mercer

  • Increase in GLBTQ Minority Stress Following the 2016 US Presidential Election

    Kirsten A. Gonzalez;Johanna L. Ramirez;M. Paz Galupo

  • Sexual Minority Reflections on the Kinsey Scale and the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid: Conceptualization and Measurement

    M. Paz Galupo;Renae C. Mitchell;Ashley L. Grynkiewicz;Kyle S. Davis

  • Experiences of LGBT Microaggressions in the Workplace: Implications for Policy

    M. Paz Galupo;Courtney A. Resnick

  • Comparing perceived experiences of prejudice among self-identified plurisexual individuals

    Renae C. Mitchell;Kyle S. Davis;M. Paz Galupo

  • Multiple minority stress: The role of proximal and distal stress on mental health outcomes among lesbian, gay, and bisexual people of color

    Johanna L. Ramirez;M. Paz Galupo

  • The impact of men seeking help for depression on perceptions of masculine and feminine characteristics.

    Michael G. McCusker;M. Paz Galupo

  • Friendship patterns of sexual minority individuals in adulthood

    M. Paz Galupo

  • Development and validation of the attitudes toward same-sex marriage scale.

    Marcia L. Pearl;M. Paz Galupo

  • Transgender friendship experiences: Benefits and barriers of friendships across gender identity and sexual orientation

    M Paz Galupo;L Andrew Bauerband;Kirsten A Gonzalez;D Brienne Hagen

  • “Like a Constantly Flowing River”: Gender Identity Flexibility Among Nonbinary Transgender Individuals

    M. Paz Galupo;Lex Pulice-Farrow;Johanna L. Ramirez

  • Gender dysphoria and minority stress: Support for inclusion of gender dysphoria as a proximal stressor.

    Louis Lindley;M. Paz Galupo

  • "Invisible During My Own Crisis": Responses of LGBT People of Color to the Orlando Shooting.

    Johanna L. Ramirez;Kirsten A. Gonzalez;M. Paz Galupo

  • Cross-category friendship patterns: Comparison of heterosexual and sexual minority adults

    M. Paz Galupo

  • “Every time I get gendered male, I feel a pain in my chest”: Understanding the social context for gender dysphoria.

    M. Paz Galupo;Lex Pulice-Farrow;Louis Lindley

  • "There Is Nothing to Do About It": Nonbinary Individuals' Experience of Gender Dysphoria.

    M. Paz Galupo;Lex Pulice-Farrow;Emerson Pehl

  • Gender-Inclusive Housing Preferences: A Survey of College-Aged Transgender Students

    Tiana E. Krum;Kyle S. Davis;M. Paz Galupo

  • The Gender Identity Reflection and Rumination Scale: Development and Psychometric Evaluation

    L. Andrew Bauerband;L. Andrew Bauerband;M. Paz Galupo

  • “I was and still am”: Narratives of Bisexual Marking in the #StillBisexual Campaign

    Kirsten A. Gonzalez;Johanna L. Ramirez;M. Paz Galupo

  • Benefits of cross-sexual orientation friendships among adolescent females

    M. Paz Galupo;Sarah St John

Frequent Co-Authors

Monnica T. Williams
Monnica T. Williams University of Ottawa
Brian A. Feinstein
Brian A. Feinstein Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and diverse career opportunities. Many students choose to specialize further in areas like counseling, clinical psychology, school counseling, or social work—fields that are highly in demand nationwide.

When researching your options, it’s helpful to look at degree and program rankings by region. For example, you might consider programs recognized among the best college counseling programs in the Midwest, which offer strong foundations and practical training.

State-specific rankings can also guide your choice. You’ll find resources for the best counseling program rankings in Minnesota, as well as recommendations for the top counseling degree programs in Mississippi.

Students interested in metropolitan areas may want to review the best counseling degree programs in Nashville. Ultimately, selecting a program with strong accreditation, flexible online learning, and high graduate employability is key to successful career pathways in psychology and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing M. Paz Galupo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles