World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6779 6317 3670 3335 131 5364

M. Paz Galupo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M. Paz Galupo between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M. Paz Galupo published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2020. 19 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2020. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 8 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 12 publications
1993 2025

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M. Paz Galupo: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 4
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 1
2011 2
2012 1
2013 8
2014 14
2015 10
2016 9
2017 11
2018 10
2019 15
2020 16
2021 9
2022 5
2023 2
2024 7
2025 12
Total 155
Download as CSV

M. Paz Galupo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Paz Galupo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 131
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

M. Paz Galupo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Paz Galupo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

M. Paz Galupo is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions to subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, gender studies, sociology and political science, and reproductive medicine.

Their work addresses multiple topics related to gender, sexuality, and health, including LGBTQ health, identity, and policy; sexuality, behavior, and technology; gender roles and identity studies; gender, feminism, and media; eating disorders and behaviors; reproductive health and technologies; and media, gender, and advertising.

Recent publications by M. Paz Galupo include:

  • "Gender dysphoria and minority stress: Support for inclusion of gender dysphoria as a proximal stressor," 2020, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • ""There Is Nothing to Do About It": Nonbinary Individuals' Experience of Gender Dysphoria," 2020, Transgender Health
  • ""Better issues to focus on": Transgender Microaggressions as Ethical Violations in Therapy," 2020, The Counseling Psychologist
  • ""Being Talked to Like I Was a Sex Toy, Like Being Transgender Was Simply for the Enjoyment of Someone Else": Fetishization and Sexualization of Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals," 2021, Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • ""Having a non-normative body for me is about survival": Androgynous body ideal among trans and nonbinary individuals," 2021, Body Image

M. Paz Galupo frequently collaborates with several scholars, including Louis Lindley, Annalisa Anzani, Claire E. Cusack, Em Matsuno, and Zakary A. Clements. These co-authors have appeared alongside Galupo across multiple published works.

Their research is often published in venues such as Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, The Journal of Sex Research, Transgender Health, Archives of Sexual Behavior, and Sexuality Research and Social Policy, indicating a strong focus on sexual and gender minority health and social issues.

Recognition of their professional standing includes being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Conceptualization of Sexual Orientation Identity Among Sexual Minorities: Patterns Across Sexual and Gender Identity

    M. Paz Galupo;Kyle S. Davis;Ashley L. Grynkiewicz;Renae C. Mitchell

  • Sexual minority self-identification: Multiple identities and complexity.

    M. Paz Galupo;Renae C. Mitchell;Kyle S. Davis

  • “Regardless of Their Gender”: Descriptions of Sexual Identity among Bisexual, Pansexual, and Queer Identified Individuals

    M. Paz Galupo;Johanna L. Ramirez;Lexi Pulice-Farrow

  • Transgender microaggressions in the context of friendship: Patterns of experience across friends’ sexual orientation and gender identity.

    M. Paz Galupo;Shane B. Henise;Kyle S. Davis

  • “The labels don't work very well”: Transgender individuals' conceptualizations of sexual orientation and sexual identity

    M. Paz Galupo;Shane B. Henise;Nicholas L. Mercer

  • Increase in GLBTQ Minority Stress Following the 2016 US Presidential Election

    Kirsten A. Gonzalez;Johanna L. Ramirez;M. Paz Galupo

  • Sexual Minority Reflections on the Kinsey Scale and the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid: Conceptualization and Measurement

    M. Paz Galupo;Renae C. Mitchell;Ashley L. Grynkiewicz;Kyle S. Davis

  • Experiences of LGBT Microaggressions in the Workplace: Implications for Policy

    M. Paz Galupo;Courtney A. Resnick

  • Comparing perceived experiences of prejudice among self-identified plurisexual individuals

    Renae C. Mitchell;Kyle S. Davis;M. Paz Galupo

  • Multiple minority stress: The role of proximal and distal stress on mental health outcomes among lesbian, gay, and bisexual people of color

    Johanna L. Ramirez;M. Paz Galupo

  • The impact of men seeking help for depression on perceptions of masculine and feminine characteristics.

    Michael G. McCusker;M. Paz Galupo

  • Friendship patterns of sexual minority individuals in adulthood

    M. Paz Galupo

  • Development and validation of the attitudes toward same-sex marriage scale.

    Marcia L. Pearl;M. Paz Galupo

  • Transgender friendship experiences: Benefits and barriers of friendships across gender identity and sexual orientation

    M Paz Galupo;L Andrew Bauerband;Kirsten A Gonzalez;D Brienne Hagen

  • “Like a Constantly Flowing River”: Gender Identity Flexibility Among Nonbinary Transgender Individuals

    M. Paz Galupo;Lex Pulice-Farrow;Johanna L. Ramirez

  • "Invisible During My Own Crisis": Responses of LGBT People of Color to the Orlando Shooting.

    Johanna L. Ramirez;Kirsten A. Gonzalez;M. Paz Galupo

  • Cross-category friendship patterns: Comparison of heterosexual and sexual minority adults

    M. Paz Galupo

  • Gender-Inclusive Housing Preferences: A Survey of College-Aged Transgender Students

    Tiana E. Krum;Kyle S. Davis;M. Paz Galupo

  • The Gender Identity Reflection and Rumination Scale: Development and Psychometric Evaluation

    L. Andrew Bauerband;L. Andrew Bauerband;M. Paz Galupo

  • “I was and still am”: Narratives of Bisexual Marking in the #StillBisexual Campaign

    Kirsten A. Gonzalez;Johanna L. Ramirez;M. Paz Galupo

  • Benefits of cross-sexual orientation friendships among adolescent females

    M. Paz Galupo;Sarah St John

Frequent Co-Authors

Monnica T. Williams
Monnica T. Williams University of Ottawa
Brian A. Feinstein
Brian A. Feinstein Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and diverse career opportunities. Many students choose to specialize further in areas like counseling, clinical psychology, school counseling, or social work—fields that are highly in demand nationwide.

When researching your options, it’s helpful to look at degree and program rankings by region. For example, you might consider programs recognized among the best college counseling programs in the Midwest, which offer strong foundations and practical training.

State-specific rankings can also guide your choice. You’ll find resources for the best counseling program rankings in Minnesota, as well as recommendations for the top counseling degree programs in Mississippi.

Students interested in metropolitan areas may want to review the best counseling degree programs in Nashville. Ultimately, selecting a program with strong accreditation, flexible online learning, and high graduate employability is key to successful career pathways in psychology and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing M. Paz Galupo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles