World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
30
Citations
4615
World Ranking
7680
National Ranking
1209

Mark McCormack publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark McCormack sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 130 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mark McCormack D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark McCormack sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Inclusive Masculinity Theory: overview, reflection and refinement

    Eric Anderson;Mark McCormack

  • Establishing and Challenging Masculinity: The Influence of Gendered Discourses in Organized Sport:

    Adrian Adams;Eric Anderson;Mark Mccormack

  • The Declining Significance of Homophobia: How Teenage Boys are Redefining Masculinity and Heterosexuality

    Mark McCormack

  • ‘It’s Just Not Acceptable Any More’: The Erosion of Homophobia and the Softening of Masculinity at an English Sixth Form:

    Mark McCormack;Eric Anderson

  • The Influence of Declining Homophobia on Men’s Gender in the United States: An Argument for the Study of Homohysteria

    Mark McCormack;Eric Anderson

  • Cuddling and Spooning: Heteromasculinity and Homosocial Tactility among Student-athletes

    Eric Anderson;Mark McCormack

  • Hierarchy without Hegemony: Locating Boys in an Inclusive School Setting

    Mark McCormack

  • Mapping the Terrain of Homosexually-Themed Language

    Mark McCormack

  • Enjoyment, Exploration and Education: Understanding the Consumption of Pornography among Young Men with Non-Exclusive Sexual Orientations:

    Mark McCormack;Liam Wignall

  • Intersectionality, Critical Race Theory, and American Sporting Oppression: Examining Black and Gay Male Athletes

    Eric Anderson;Mark McCormack

  • Male Team Sport Hazing Initiations in a Culture of Decreasing Homohysteria

    Eric Anderson;Mark McCormack;Harry Lee

  • The declining significance of homohysteria for male students in three sixth forms in the south of England

    M. McCormack

  • The intersection of youth masculinities, decreasing homophobia and class: an ethnography.

    Mark McCormack

  • Innovative sampling and participant recruitment in sexuality research

    Mark McCormack

  • The re-production of homosexually-themed discourse in educationally-based organised sport.

    Mark McCormack;Eric Anderson

  • An Exploratory Study of a New Kink Activity: "Pup Play".

    Liam Wignall;Mark McCormack

  • Homohysteria: Definitions, Context and Intersectionality

    Mark McCormack;Eric Anderson

  • Changes in Sexual Desire and Behaviors among UK Young Adults During Social Lockdown Due to COVID-19.

    Liam Wignall;Emma Portch;Mark McCormack;Rebecca Owens

  • Cohort Effect on the Coming Out Experiences of Bisexual Men

    Mark McCormack;Eric Anderson;Adrian Adams

  • Heteronormativity in the University Classroom: Novelty Attachment and Content Substitution among Gay-friendly Students

    Matthew Ripley;Eric Anderson;Mark McCormack;Benjamin Rockett

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Anderson
Eric Anderson University of Winchester
Ritch C. Savin-Williams
Ritch C. Savin-Williams Cornell University
Kalwant Bhopal
Kalwant Bhopal University of Birmingham

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark McCormack

Recently Published Articles