World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6824 6358 684 652 119 13135

David M. Frost publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David M. Frost between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David M. Frost published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2018. 19 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2018. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 13 publications
2004 2025

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David M. Frost: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 3
2007 1
2008 5
2009 3
2010 3
2011 7
2012 2
2013 6
2014 9
2015 7
2016 4
2017 7
2018 17
2019 9
2020 14
2021 11
2022 10
2023 8
2024 6
2025 13
Total 146
Download as CSV

David M. Frost publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Frost sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 119
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David M. Frost D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Frost sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David M. Frost is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within social sciences and psychology, with an emphasis on social psychology, sociology and political science, and clinical psychology. The focus of their scholarly work includes LGBTQ health, identity and policy, reproductive health and technologies, and issues related to racial and ethnic identity.

The scientist's key topics of study cover the following areas:

  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Their frequent publication venues highlight a sustained contribution to specialized fields and interdisciplinary research:

  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • LGBT Health
  • PLoS ONE
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication

David M. Frost has collaborated regularly with several coauthors, reflecting shared research interests and ongoing academic partnerships. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Ilan H. Meyer
  • Stephen T. Russell
  • Allen J. LeBlanc
  • Phillip L. Hammack
  • Bianca D. M. Wilson

Representative recent publications illustrate the scope of their research topics and academic impact:

  • "Minority stress theory: Application, critique, and continued relevance," 2023, published in Current Opinion in Psychology
  • "Social Change and the Health of Sexual Minority Individuals: Do the Effects of Minority Stress and Community Connectedness Vary by Age Cohort?," 2022, published in Archives of Sexual Behavior

Other highly cited papers within related fields, though not authored by Frost, reflect predominant themes relevant to their work:

  • "'It's being a part of a grand tradition, a grand counter-culture which involves communities': A qualitative investigation of autistic community connectedness," 2022, Autism
  • "Minority stress, distress, and suicide attempts in three cohorts of sexual minority adults: A U.S. probability sample," 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "\"Autism is me\": an investigation of how autistic individuals make sense of autism and stigma," 2020, Disability & Society

Best Publications

  • Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.

    Heidi M. Levitt;Michael Bamberg;John W. Creswell;David M. Frost

  • Internalized Homophobia and Relationship Quality among Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals.

    David M. Frost;Ilan H. Meyer

  • Social patterning of stress and coping: does disadvantaged social statuses confer more stress and fewer coping resources?

    Ilan H. Meyer;Sharon Schwartz;David M. Frost

  • Minority stress and physical health among sexual minority individuals

    David M. Frost;Keren Lehavot;Ilan H. Meyer

  • Measuring Community Connectedness among Diverse Sexual Minority Populations

    David M. Frost;Ilan H. Meyer

  • Social and psychological well-being in lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: the effects of race, gender, age, and sexual identity.

    Robert M. Kertzner;Ilan H. Meyer;David M. Frost;Michael J. Stirratt

  • Minority stress and the health of sexual minorities.

    Ilan H. Meyer;David M. Frost

  • Social stigma and its consequences for the socially stigmatized.

    David M. Frost

  • Minority Stress and Stress Proliferation among Same-Sex and Other Marginalized Couples

    Allen J. LeBlanc;David M. Frost;Richard G. Wight

  • "Autism is me": an investigation of how autistic individuals make sense of autism and stigma

    Monique Botha;Bridget Dibb;David M. Frost

  • Social support networks among diverse sexual minority populations.

    David M. Frost;Ilan H. Meyer;Sharon Schwartz

  • Stigma and intimacy in same-sex relationships: a narrative approach.

    David M. Frost

  • Region, Social Identities, and Disclosure Practices as Predictors of Heterosexist Discrimination Against Sexual Minorities in the United States

    Eric Swank;Breanne Fahs;David M. Frost

  • Minority stress, distress, and suicide attempts in three cohorts of sexual minority adults: A U.S. probability sample

    Ilan H. Meyer;Stephen T. Russell;Phillip L. Hammack;David M. Frost

  • Minority Stress, Resilience, and Mental Health: A Study of Italian Transgender People

    Cristiano Scandurra;Anna Lisa Amodeo;Paolo Valerio;Vincenzo Bochicchio

  • Queer Intimacies: A New Paradigm for the Study of Relationship Diversity.

    Phillip L Hammack;David M Frost;Sam D Hughes

  • Stigma, Concealment and Symptoms of Depression as Explanations for Sexually Transmitted Infections among Gay Men

    David M. Frost;Jeffrey T. Parsons;José E. Nanín

  • Rural location and exposure to minority stress among sexual minorities in the United States

    Eric Swank;David M. Frost;Breanne Fahs

  • Couple-Level Minority Stress: An Examination of Same-Sex Couples’ Unique Experiences.

    David M. Frost;David M. Frost;Allen J. LeBlanc;Brian de Vries;Eli Alston-Stepnitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Ilan H. Meyer
Ilan H. Meyer University of California, Los Angeles
Phillip L. Hammack
Phillip L. Hammack University of California, Santa Cruz
Stephen T. Russell
Stephen T. Russell The University of Texas at Austin
Marguerita Lightfoot
Marguerita Lightfoot University of California, San Francisco
Rob Stephenson
Rob Stephenson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeffrey T. Parsons
Jeffrey T. Parsons City University of New York
Keren Lehavot
Keren Lehavot University of Washington
Michelle Fine
Michelle Fine City University of New York
Breanne Fahs
Breanne Fahs Arizona State University
Jessica N. Fish
Jessica N. Fish University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens doors to a variety of educational and professional opportunities. Many students today opt for online psychology degrees, as these programs offer flexibility and can often be completed at an accelerated pace. Online learning allows you to balance studies with work or family commitments, while still gaining the knowledge required for rewarding careers like counseling.

If your goal is to become a licensed counselor quickly, exploring state-specific pathways is crucial. For example, those interested in working in Nebraska can learn about Nebraska accelerated counseling programs designed to fast-track your entry into the field. In Nevada, understanding the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Nevada is essential due to unique local requirements.

Similarly, if you are in New Hampshire, you may want to explore the fastest way to become a counselor in New Hampshire. For those based in New Jersey, investigate the fastest way to become a counselor in New Jersey to ensure you meet all state requirements efficiently.

No matter your location, researching online degrees and state-specific licensure processes helps you make informed choices and launch your psychology career with confidence.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Frost

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles