World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
43
Citations
7494
World Ranking
19391
National Ranking
928

Pascal Gamas publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pascal Gamas sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 74 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Pascal Gamas D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pascal Gamas sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pascal Gamas is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a notable emphasis on Plant Science and Cell Biology subfields. The main topics covered in their work include Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis, Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism, Soybean genetics and cultivation, Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms, Cassava research and cyanide, Hemoglobin structure and function, and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics.

Their recent published papers include the following:

  • "NIN-like protein transcription factors regulate leghemoglobin genes in legume nodules," 2021, Science
  • "MtExpress, a Comprehensive and Curated RNAseq-based Gene Expression Atlas for the Model Legume Medicago truncatula," 2021, Plant and Cell Physiology
  • "DNA demethylation and hypermethylation are both required for late nodule development in Medicago," 2022, Nature Plants
  • "MtEFD and MtEFD2: Two transcription factors with distinct neofunctionalization in symbiotic nodule development," 2022, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
  • "Symbiotic Nodule Development and Efficiency in the Medicago truncatula Mtefd-1 Mutant Is Highly Dependent on Sinorhizobium Strains," 2022, Plant and Cell Physiology

Pascal Gamas collaborates frequently with several coauthors. These include Sébastien Carrère, Marie-Françoise Jardinaud, Yann Pécrix, Jérôme Verdier, and Sandra Moreau.

Their work has been published repeatedly in several journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Plant and Cell Physiology
  • Science
  • Nature Plants
  • PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Pascal Gamas's research contributions span multiple areas within plant sciences and agricultural biology, particularly focusing on molecular mechanisms underlying legume symbiosis and gene expression associated with nodule development in legumes. Their research outputs reflect an interdisciplinary approach connecting plant molecular biology, genetics, and symbiotic interactions important for nitrogen fixation and plant health.

Best Publications

  • MtHAP2-1 is a key transcriptional regulator of symbiotic nodule development regulated by microRNA169 in Medicago truncatula

    Jean Philippe Combier;Florian Frugier;Françoise De Billy;Adnane Boualem

  • An integrated analysis of plant and bacterial gene expression in symbiotic root nodules using laser‐capture microdissection coupled to RNA sequencing

    Brice Roux;Brice Roux;Nathalie Rodde;Nathalie Rodde;Marie-Françoise Jardinaud;Marie-Françoise Jardinaud;Marie-Françoise Jardinaud;Ton Timmers;Ton Timmers

  • A remorin protein interacts with symbiotic receptors and regulates bacterial infection.

    Benoit Lefebvre;Ton Timmers;Malick Mbengue;Sandra Moreau

  • CCAAT-box binding transcription factors in plants: Y so many?

    Tom Laloum;Stéphane De Mita;Pascal Gamas;Pascal Gamas;Maël Baudin;Maël Baudin

  • Expression Profiling in Medicago truncatula Identifies More Than 750 Genes Differentially Expressed during Nodulation, Including Many Potential Regulators of the Symbiotic Program

    Fikri El Yahyaoui;Helge Küster;Besma Ben Amor;Natalija Hohnjec

  • Use of a subtractive hybridization approach to identify new Medicago truncatula genes induced during root nodule development.

    P. Gamas;F. De Carvalho Niebel;N. Lescure;J. V. Cullimore

  • Whole-genome landscape of Medicago truncatula symbiotic genes

    Yann Pecrix;S Evan Staton;Erika Sallet;Christine Lelandais-Brière;Christine Lelandais-Brière

  • Exploring root symbiotic programs in the model legume Medicago truncatula using EST analysis.

    Etienne‐Pascal Journet;Diederik van Tuinen;Jérome Gouzy;Hervé Crespeau

  • EFD Is an ERF transcription factor involved in the control of nodule number and differentiation in Medicago truncatula.

    Tatiana Vernié;Sandra Moreau;Françoise de Billy;Julie Plet

  • Full-length de novo assembly of RNA-seq data in pea (Pisum sativum L.) provides a gene expression atlas and gives insights into root nodulation in this species.

    Susete Alves-Carvalho;Grégoire Aubert;Sébastien Carrère;Corinne Cruaud

  • A regulatory network-based approach dissects late maturation processes related to the acquisition of desiccation tolerance and longevity of Medicago truncatula seeds.

    Jerome Verdier;David Lalanne;Sandra Pelletier;Ivone Torres-Jerez

  • Tn7 transposition in vitro proceeds through an excised transposon intermediate generated by staggered breaks in DNA

    Roland Bainton;Pascal Gamas;Nancy L. Craig

  • Genome-wide annotation of remorins, a plant-specific protein family: evolutionary and functional perspectives.

    Sylvain Raffaele;Sébastien Mongrand;Pascal Gamas;Andreas Niebel

  • Symbiosis-specific expression of two Medicago truncatula nodulin genes, MtN1 and MtN13, encoding products homologous to plant defense proteins.

    Gamas P;de Billy F;Truchet G

  • Two CCAAT-box-binding transcription factors redundantly regulate early steps of the legume-rhizobia endosymbiosis.

    Tom Laloum;Tom Laloum;Maël Baudin;Maël Baudin;Lisa Frances;Lisa Frances;Agnes Lepage;Agnes Lepage

  • Escherichia coli integration host factor binds specifically to the ends of the insertion sequence IS1 and to its major insertion hot-spot in pBR322.

    Pascal Gamas;Michael G. Chandler;Pierre Prentki;David J. Galas

  • Construction and validation of cDNA-based Mt6k-RIT macro- and microarrays to explore root endosymbioses in the model legume Medicago truncatula

    Helge Küster;Natalija Hohnjec;Franziska Krajinski;Fikri El Yahyaoui

  • The CCAAT box-binding transcription factor NF-YA1 controls rhizobial infection

    Philippe Laporte;Agnes Lepage;Agnes Lepage;Joëlle Fournier;Joëlle Fournier;Olivier Catrice;Olivier Catrice

  • Trans-regulation of the expression of the transcription factor MtHAP2-1 by a uORF controls root nodule development.

    Jean Philippe Combier;Françoise de Billy;Pascal Gamas;Andreas Niebel

  • Cytokinins in Symbiotic Nodulation: When, Where, What For?

    Pascal Gamas;Mathias Brault;Marie-Françoise Jardinaud;Florian Frugier

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Niebel
Andreas Niebel Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Jérôme Gouzy
Jérôme Gouzy Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Michael Chandler
Michael Chandler Georgetown University Medical Center
Florian Frugier
Florian Frugier University of Évry Val d'Essonne
Jean-François Briat
Jean-François Briat INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Thomas Ott
Thomas Ott University of Freiburg
David J. Galas
David J. Galas Pacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute
Michael K. Udvardi
Michael K. Udvardi Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jacqueline Grima-Pettenati
Jacqueline Grima-Pettenati Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Julia Buitink
Julia Buitink University of Rennes

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up a wide range of career opportunities, especially in the rapidly evolving healthcare sector. One popular pathway is pursuing a career as a certified professional coder, which allows you to work with healthcare data, medical billing, and insurance documentation.

Professionals in this field benefit from competitive compensation, as reflected in the average certified medical coder salary. These roles are in high demand due to the increased need for accurate medical records and efficient billing processes.

Before choosing this direction, it’s important to understand the advantages and potential drawbacks. Explore whether is medical coding a good job for your personal and professional goals.

For those seeking flexibility, a degree in Health Information Management can be earned remotely. Find options for a quality education with the online health information management degree that fits your budget and schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Pascal Gamas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles