World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
78
Citations
28400
World Ranking
1559
National Ranking
932

Paul Crits-Christoph publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Crits-Christoph sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 287 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul Crits-Christoph D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Crits-Christoph sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Crits-Christoph is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their professional career centers around academic research in the context of this institution.

There is no publicly available record of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues associated with Paul Crits-Christoph. Similarly, there is no documentation of book publications or specific main fields, subfields, or main topics related to their research work.

There are also no awards recorded as having been received by this scientist.

This profile is constructed solely on the factual information available from academic and institutional sources without additional interpretations or evaluations.

Best Publications

  • Update on Empirically Validated Therapies, II

    Dianne L. Chambless;Mary J. Baker;Donald H. Baucom;Larry E. Beutler

  • Understanding Transference: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method

    Lester Luborsky;Paul Crits-Christoph

  • The Risk of Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidality in Patients With Psoriasis: A Population-Based Cohort Study

    Shanu Kohli Kurd;Andrea B Troxel;Paul Crits-Christoph;Joel M Gelfand

  • Empirically supported individual and group psychological treatments for adult mental disorders.

    Robert J. DeRubeis;Paul Crits-Christoph

  • Meta‐Analysis of Therapist Effects in Psychotherapy Outcome Studies

    Paul Crits-Christoph;Kathryn Baranackie;Julie S. Kurcias;Aaron T. Beck

  • EARLY WITHDRAWAL FROM MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOTHERAPY PRACTICE

    Marna S. Barrett;Wee Jhong Chua;Paul Crits-Christoph;Mary Beth Gibbons

  • Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study.

    Paul Crits-Christoph;Lynne Siqueland;Jack Blaine;Arlene Frank

  • Alliance predicts patients’ outcome beyond in-treatment change in symptoms.

    Jacques P. Barber;Mary Beth Connolly;Paul Crits-Christoph;Lynn Gladis

  • Implications of therapist effects for the design and analysis of comparative studies of psychotherapies.

    Paul Crits-Christoph;Jim Mintz

  • Effectiveness of St John's wort in major depression: A randomized controlled trial

    Richard C. Shelton;Martin B. Keller;Allan Gelenberg;David L. Dunner

  • Two helping alliance methods for predicting outcomes of psychotherapy. A counting signs vs. a global rating method.

    Lester Luborsky;Paul Crits-Christoph;Leslie Alexander;Miriam Margolis

  • Independent assessment of manic and depressive symptoms by self-rating. Scale characteristics and implications for the study of mania.

    Mark S. Bauer;Paul Crits-Christoph;William A. Ball;Edward Dewees

  • Quality of life: expanding the scope of clinical significance.

    Madeline M. Gladis;Elizabeth A. Gosch;Nicole M. Dishuk;Paul Crits-Christoph

  • The accuracy of therapists' interpretations and the outcome of dynamic psychotherapy.

    Paul Crits-Christoph;Andrew Cooper;Lester Luborsky

  • Predicting the Outcomes of Psychotherapy by the Penn Helping Alliance Rating Method

    Rose Morgan;Lester Luborsky;Paul Crits-Christoph;Homer Curtis

  • DO THERAPISTS VARY MUCH IN THEIR SUCCESS?. Findings from Four Outcome Studies

    Lester Luborsky;Paul Crits-Christoph;A. Thomas McLellan;George Woody

  • Effects of therapist adherence and competence on patient outcome in brief dynamic therapy.

    Jacques P. Barber;Paul Crits-Christoph;Lester Luborsky

  • The Dependability of Alliance Assessments: The Alliance-Outcome Correlation Is Larger than You Might Think.

    Paul Crits-Christoph;Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons;Jessica Hamilton;Sarah Ring-Kurtz

  • The efficacy of brief dynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis.

    Paul Crits-Christoph

  • Cocaine Dependence With and Without PTSD Among Subjects in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study

    Lisa M. Najavits;David R. Gastfriend;Jacques P. Barber;Sharon Reif

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Gallop
Robert Gallop West Chester University
Jacques P. Barber
Jacques P. Barber Adelphi University
Lester Luborsky
Lester Luborsky University of Pennsylvania
Michael E. Thase
Michael E. Thase University of Pennsylvania
Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
Shannon Wiltsey Stirman Stanford University
Roger D. Weiss
Roger D. Weiss Harvard University
George E. Woody
George E. Woody University of Pennsylvania
Aaron T. Beck
Aaron T. Beck University of Pennsylvania
Lisa M. Najavits
Lisa M. Najavits University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Margaret L. Griffin
Margaret L. Griffin Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online learning has made studying psychology more flexible and accessible. A common question is whether is an online psychology degree respected by employers. Most employers today value online psychology degrees from accredited institutions, especially when the curriculum and faculty match those of on-campus programs.

Choosing the right degree is crucial for your career path. When comparing a psych ba vs bs, consider your career goals. A BA often emphasizes liberal arts and may suit those interested in counseling or social work, while a BS focuses more on research and science, preparing you for advanced graduate study.

For students aiming to become licensed clinical psychologists sooner, some universities offer accelerated psyd online programs. These programs can be completed in three years, helping you enter the workforce faster.

Applied Behavior Analysis is another popular pathway in psychology, especially for those interested in working with children or individuals with developmental challenges. Explore aba masters programs online to find flexible, accredited programs that can enhance your expertise in this specialized field.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Crits-Christoph

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles