World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
25796
World Ranking
16568
National Ranking
8323

Shuk-Mei Ho publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shuk-Mei Ho sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 286 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Shuk-Mei Ho D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shuk-Mei Ho sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shuk-Mei Ho is affiliated with the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in the United States, engaging primarily in research within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several interconnected subfields, including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, as well as Genetics.

The scientist's research concentrates on multiple domains, with a focus on the effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals, epigenetics and DNA methylation, toxic organic pollutants impact, birth, development, and health, health, environment, cognitive aging, glioma diagnosis and treatment, and microRNA in disease regulation.

Frequent publication venues in which their research appears include:

  • The Prostate
  • Metabolomics
  • Cancer Research
  • Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • Environmental Health Perspectives

Several coauthors regularly collaborate with Shuk-Mei Ho, including:

  • Yuet-Kin Leung
  • Siegfried Kasper
  • Samuel R. Denmeade
  • Tamara L. Lotan
  • Shawn E. Lupold

Representative recent papers authored by Shuk-Mei Ho include:

  • A novel Cas9-targeted long-read assay for simultaneous detection of IDH1/2 mutations and clinically relevant MGMT methylation in fresh biopsies of diffuse glioma, 2020, Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • Low-Dose Bisphenol A in a Rat Model of Endometrial Cancer: A CLARITY-BPA Study, 2020, Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Genetic and epigenetic changes in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis: association with decreased endometrial αvβ3 integrin expression, 2021, Molecular Human Reproduction
  • Estrogen activates pyruvate kinase M2 and increases the growth of TSC2-deficient cells, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • The Loss of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor NR2E3 Augments Wnt/β-catenin Signaling via Epigenetic Dysregulation that Enhances Sp1-β catenin-p300 Interactions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, 2024, Advanced Science

Best Publications

  • The DNA sequence of human chromosome 22

    I. Dunham;N. Shimizu;B. A. Roe;S. Chissoe

  • Developmental Exposure to Estradiol and Bisphenol A Increases Susceptibility to Prostate Carcinogenesis and Epigenetically Regulates Phosphodiesterase Type 4 Variant 4

    Shuk Mei Ho;Wan Yee Tang;Jessica Belmonte De Frausto;Gail S. Prins

  • Human prostate cancer risk factors.

    David G. Bostwick;Harry B. Burke;Daniel Djakiew;Susan Euling

  • Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels of exposure.

    Frederick S. vom Saal;Benson T Akingbemi;Scott M Belcher;Linda S. Birnbaum

  • Female reproductive disorders: the roles of endocrine-disrupting compounds and developmental timing.

    D. Andrew Crain;Sarah J. Janssen;Thea M. Edwards;Jerrold Heindel

  • Comparative Studies of the Estrogen Receptors β and α and the Androgen Receptor in Normal Human Prostate Glands, Dysplasia, and in Primary and Metastatic Carcinoma

    Irwin Leav;Kin-Mang Lau;Jason Y. Adams;John E. McNeal

  • Relation of DNA Methylation of 5′-CpG Island of ACSL3 to Transplacental Exposure to Airborne Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Childhood Asthma

    Frederica Perera;Wan Yee Tang;Julie Herbstman;Deliang Tang

  • Developmental neurotoxicants in e-waste: an emerging health concern.

    Aimin Chen;Kim N. Dietrich;Xia Huo;Shuk-mei Ho

  • Estrogen receptor (ER)-β isoforms: A key to understanding ER-β signaling

    Yuet-Kin Leung;Paul Mak;Sazzad Hassan;Shuk-Mei Ho

  • Expression of estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha and ER-beta in normal and malignant prostatic epithelial cells: regulation by methylation and involvement in growth regulation

    Kin-Mang Lau;Mark LaSpina;John P. Long;Shuk-Mei Ho

  • A review of the carcinogenic potential of bisphenol A.

    Darcie D. Seachrist;Kristen W. Bonk;Shuk Mei Ho;Gail S. Prins

  • Environmental epigenetics and asthma: current concepts and call for studies.

    Rachel L. Miller;Shuk-mei Ho

  • An evaluation of evidence for the carcinogenic activity of bisphenol A.

    Ruth A. Keri;Shuk Mei Ho;Patricia A. Hunt;Karen E. Knudsen

  • Expression of human estrogen receptor-α and -β, progesterone receptor, and androgen receptor mRNA in normal and malignant ovarian epithelial cells

    Kin Mang Lau;Samuel C. Mok;Shuk Mei Ho;Shuk Mei Ho

  • Why Public Health Agencies Cannot Depend on Good Laboratory Practices as a Criterion for Selecting Data: The Case of Bisphenol A

    John Peterson Myers;Frederick S. vom Saal;Benson T Akingbemi;Koji Arizono

  • Epigenetics meets endocrinology

    Xiang Zhang;Shuk-Mei Ho

  • Estrogen, progesterone and epithelial ovarian cancer.

    Shuk-Mei Ho

  • Epigenetic reprogramming and imprinting in origins of disease.

    Wan Yee Tang;Shuk Mei Ho

  • Summary of the National Toxicology Program's report of the endocrine disruptors low-dose peer review

    Ronald Melnick;George Lucier;Mary Wolfe;Roxanne Hall

  • Environmental epigenetics of asthma: An update

    Shuk-Mei Ho

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Medvedovic
Mario Medvedovic University of Cincinnati
Gail S. Prins
Gail S. Prins University of Illinois at Chicago
Cheryl L. Walker
Cheryl L. Walker Baylor College of Medicine
Tiina Reponen
Tiina Reponen University of Cincinnati
Xia Huo
Xia Huo Jinan University
Kurunthachalam Kannan
Kurunthachalam Kannan University at Albany, State University of New York
Ana M. Soto
Ana M. Soto Tufts University
Rachel L. Miller
Rachel L. Miller Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Divaker Choubey
Divaker Choubey University of Cincinnati
Janet L. Stanford
Janet L. Stanford Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in a healthcare career but are considering alternatives to traditional medical school, there are a range of accessible online degrees and career paths to explore. For example, those with a non-nursing background can consider online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors, which provide a flexible route to an advanced nursing credential.

Some prospective nurses may appreciate the opportunities found in the easiest rn program to get into, which can make entering the field more attainable for students with varied academic records. Additionally, for those wishing to work in healthcare administration, there are reputable medical billing and coding schools with financial aid, making this career path both flexible and affordable.

Finally, if test requirements have been a barrier, you can find nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams. These programs offer more accessible admissions for aspiring nurses. Exploring these options can help you find the educational pathway that matches your interests, schedule, and career goals in the US healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Shuk-Mei Ho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles