World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
66
Citations
19427
World Ranking
2974
National Ranking
1381

Jay Schulkin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay Schulkin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 318 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jay Schulkin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay Schulkin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay Schulkin is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a specific focus on public health, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology. Schulkin's work spans multiple subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health; and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The scientist's research covers various interconnected topics, such as maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, stress responses and cortisol regulation, maternal and perinatal health interventions, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, reproductive health and contraception, gestational diabetes research and management, and vaccine coverage and hesitancy.

Schulkin has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications appearing in the following venues:

  • Journal of Women's Health
  • Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Vaccine
  • Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine

Their recent papers include:

  • "Activating Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Systems in the Nucleus Accumbens, Amygdala, and Bed Nucleus of Stria Terminalis: Incentive Motivation or Aversive Motivation?" (2021, Biological Psychiatry)
  • "Corticotropin-releasing hormone signaling from prefrontal cortex to lateral septum suppresses interaction with familiar mice" (2023, Cell)
  • "Vaccine hesitancy in pregnant Women: A narrative review" (2023, Vaccine)
  • "A comparison of anatomic and cellular transcriptome structures across 40 human brain diseases" (2023, PLoS Biology)
  • "Racial disparities in influenza immunization during pregnancy in the United States: A narrative review of the evidence for disparities and potential interventions" (2021, Vaccine)

Schulkin has collaborated frequently with several coauthors including Michael L. Power (15 joint publications), Matthew Crippen (10), Mallory Kremer (7), Meaghan Stacy (6), and Eda G. Reed (5).

The scientist is also an author of academic books published by renowned presses. Their book publications include:

  • Cambridge University Press (3 titles): "Biological Cognition" (2022), "Habits" (2020), "Understanding Suicide in the United States" (2023)
  • The MIT Press: "Mind in Nature" (2023)
  • Columbia University Press: "Mind Ecologies" (2020)
  • eBooks: ":," (2020)
  • Psychology Press eBooks: "Effort" (2020)

Best Publications

  • An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome

    Michael J. Hawrylycz;Ed S. Lein;Angela L. Guillozet-Bongaarts;Elaine H. Shen

  • From normal fear to pathological anxiety

    Jeffrey B. Rosen;Jay Schulkin

  • Canonical Genetic Signatures of the Adult Human Brain

    Michael Hawrylycz;Jeremy A. Miller;Vilas Menon;David Feng

  • Glucocorticoid regulation of diverse cognitive functions in normal and pathological emotional states

    Kristine Erickson;Wayne Drevets;Jay Schulkin;Jay Schulkin

  • INDUCTION OF CORTICOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE GENE EXPRESSION BY GLUCOCORTICOIDS: IMPLICATION FOR UNDERSTANDING THE STATES OF FEAR AND ANXIETY AND ALLOSTATIC LOAD

    Jay Schulkin;Philip W. Gold;Bruce S. McEwen

  • Corticosterone effects on corticotropin-releasing hormone mRNA in the central nucleus of the amygdala and the parvocellular region of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus

    Shinya Makino;Phillip W. Gold;Jay Schulkin

  • Allostasis, amygdala, and anticipatory angst

    Jay Schulkin;Bruce S. McEwen;Bruce S. McEwen;Philip W. Gold;Philip W. Gold

  • Behavioral and neuroendocrine responses in shy children

    Louis A. Schmidt;Nathan A. Fox;Kenneth H. Rubin;Esther M. Sternberg

  • Effects of corticosterone on CRH mRNA and content in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; comparison with the effects in the central nucleus of the amygdala and the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus

    Shinya Makino;Phillip W. Gold;Jay Schulkin

  • Anticipatory physiological regulation in feeding biology: cephalic phase responses.

    Michael L. Power;Jay Schulkin;Jay Schulkin;Jay Schulkin

  • Addiction and stress: An allostatic view

    George F. Koob;Jay Schulkin

  • Nucleus accumbens corticotropin-releasing factor increases cue-triggered motivation for sucrose reward: paradoxical positive incentive effects in stress?

    Susana Peciña;Jay Schulkin;Kent C Berridge

  • Allostasis: A Brain-Centered, Predictive Mode of Physiological Regulation.

    Jay Schulkin;Peter Sterling

  • Central gustatory lesions: II. Effects on sodium appetite, taste aversion learning, and feeding behaviors.

    Francis W. Flynn;Harvey J. Grill;Jay Schulkin;Ralph Norgren

  • A Central Amygdala CRF Circuit Facilitates Learning about Weak Threats.

    Christina A. Sanford;Marta E. Soden;Madison A. Baird;Samara M. Miller

  • A neuroendocrine mechanism for sustaining fear

    Jay Schulkin;Jay Schulkin;Jay Schulkin;Maria A. Morgan;Jeffrey B. Rosen

  • Ventral medial prefrontal cortex and emotional perseveration: the memory for prior extinction training

    Maria A Morgan;Jay Schulkin;Jay Schulkin;Jay Schulkin;Joseph E LeDoux;Joseph E LeDoux

  • Extreme fear, shyness, and social phobia : origins, biological mechanisms, and clinical outcomes

    Louis A. Schmidt;Jay Schulkin

  • Epigenetic modulation of chronic anxiety and pain by histone deacetylation

    L Tran;J Schulkin;C O Ligon;B Greenwood-Van Meerveld

  • Preterm birth: associated neuroendocrine, medical, and behavioral risk factors.

    Kristine Erickson;Poul Thorsen;George Chrousos;Dimitri E. Grigoriadis

  • Palatability shift of a salt-associated incentive during sodium depletion.

    Kent C. Berridge;Jay Schulkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis A. Schmidt
Louis A. Schmidt McMaster University
Jeffrey B. Rosen
Jeffrey B. Rosen University of Delaware
Geoffrey B. Hall
Geoffrey B. Hall McMaster University
Martin M. Antony
Martin M. Antony Toronto Metropolitan University
Sidney J. Segalowitz
Sidney J. Segalowitz Brock University
Diane L. Santesso
Diane L. Santesso University of Winnipeg
Leslie Atkinson
Leslie Atkinson Toronto Metropolitan University
Randi E. McCabe
Randi E. McCabe McMaster University
Gretchen B. Chapman
Gretchen B. Chapman Carnegie Mellon University
Tracy Vaillancourt
Tracy Vaillancourt University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jay Schulkin

Trending Scientists