World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 40 8152 7836 2911 2711 126 5344

David H. Schoellhamer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David H. Schoellhamer between 1985 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David H. Schoellhamer published across 37 years, from 1985 to 2021, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2013. 4 of the 127 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2013. 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications
1985 2021

127 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David H. Schoellhamer: publications per year, 1985 to 2021
Year Publications
1985 2
1986 2
1987 0
1988 2
1989 3
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 4
1994 0
1995 3
1996 4
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 3
2001 3
2002 5
2003 4
2004 7
2005 3
2006 5
2007 5
2008 4
2009 8
2010 5
2011 6
2012 4
2013 12
2014 3
2015 6
2016 9
2017 3
2018 3
2019 1
2020 1
2021 3
Total 127
Download as CSV

David H. Schoellhamer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Schoellhamer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 126
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

David H. Schoellhamer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Schoellhamer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321 40
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

David H. Schoellhamer is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions in Environmental Science. Key subfields for their work include Earth-Surface Processes, Ecology, and Atmospheric Science.

The scientist's research topics feature several aspects of coastal and marine environments. These topics include:

  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Geological formations and processes
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research

A predominant publication venue for their work is the journal Estuaries and Coasts, where they have published multiple papers. Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by David H. Schoellhamer include:

  • Suspended-sediment Flux in the San Francisco Estuary; Part II: the Impact of the 2013-2016 California Drought and Controls on Sediment Flux (2020), Estuaries and Coasts
  • Suspended Sediment Flux in the San Francisco Estuary: Part I-Changes in the Vertical Distribution of Suspended Sediment and Bias in Estuarine Sediment Flux Measurements (2020), Estuaries and Coasts
  • Tidal Asymmetry in Ocean-Boundary Flux and In-Estuary Trapping of Suspended Sediment Following Watershed Storms: San Francisco Estuary, California, USA (2021), Estuaries and Coasts
  • Correction to: Tidal Asymmetry in Ocean-Boundary Flux and In-Estuary Trapping of Suspended Sediment Following Watershed Storms: San Francisco Estuary, California, USA (2021), Estuaries and Coasts

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Notable coauthors include:

  • Maureen A. Downing-Kunz
  • Daniel Livsey
  • Andrew J. Manning
  • Paul A. Work

Best Publications

  • Projected Evolution of California's San Francisco Bay-Delta-River System in a Century of Climate Change

    James E. Cloern;Noah Knowles;Larry R. Brown;Daniel Cayan

  • Singular spectrum analysis for time series with missing data

    David H. Schoellhamer

  • Anthropogenic Sediment Resuspension Mechanisms in a Shallow Microtidal Estuary

    David H. Schoellhamer

  • Effects of spatial and temporal variability of turbidity on phytoplankton blooms

    Christine L. May;Jeffrey R. Koseff;Lisa V. Lucas;James E. Cloern

  • Trends in the Sediment Yield of the Sacramento River, California, 1957 - 2001

    San Francisco;Scott A. Wright;David H. Schoellhamer

  • Sudden clearing of estuarine waters upon crossing the threshold from transport to supply regulation of sediment transport as an erodible sediment pool is depleted: San Francisco Bay, 1999

    David H. Schoellhamer

  • Combined Use of Remote Sensing and Continuous Monitoring to Analyse the Variability of Suspended-Sediment Concentrations in San Francisco Bay, California

    C.A. Ruhl;D.H. Schoellhamer;R.P. Stumpf;C.L. Lindsay

  • Wetland Accretion Rate Model of Ecosystem Resilience (WARMER) and Its Application to Habitat Sustainability for Endangered Species in the San Francisco Estuary

    Kathleen M. Swanson;Judith Z. Drexler;David H. Schoellhamer;Karen M. Thorne

  • Suspended sediment and sediment-associated contaminants in San Francisco Bay

    David H. Schoellhamer;Thomas E. Mumley;Jon E. Leatherbarrow

  • Variability of suspended-sediment concentration at tidal to annual time scales in San Francisco Bay, USA

    David H. Schoellhamer

  • Factors controlling floc settling velocity along a longitudinal estuarine transect

    A.J. Manning;A.J. Manning;A.J. Manning;David H. Schoellhamer;David H. Schoellhamer

  • Quantifying fluxes and characterizing compositional changes of dissolved organic matter in aquatic systems in situ using combined acoustic and optical measurements

    Bryan D. Downing;Emmanuel Boss;Brian A. Bergamaschi;Jacob A. Fleck

  • Estimates of suspended sediment entering San Francisco Bay from the Sacramento and San Joaquin Delta, San Francisco Bay, California

    Lester J. McKee;Neil K. Ganju;David H. Schoellhamer

  • Sediment transport in the San Francisco Bay Coastal System: An overview

    Patrick L. Barnard;David H. Schoellhamer;David H. Schoellhamer;Bruce E. Jaffe;Lester J. McKee

  • Vertical gradational variability of fines deposited in a gravel framework

    Unknown

  • Influence of salinity, bottom topography, and tides on locations of estuarine turbidity maxima in northern San Francisco Bay

    David H. Schoellhamer

  • Factors affecting suspended‐solids concentrations in South San Francisco Bay, California

    Unknown

  • Estimating sediment budgets at the interface between rivers and estuaries with application to the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta

    Scott A. Wright;David H. Schoellhamer

  • Sediment resuspension mechanisms in old Tampa Bay, Florida

    David H. Schoellhamer

  • Trophic structure and avian communities across a salinity gradient in evaporation ponds of the San Francisco Bay estuary

    John Y. Takekawa;A.K. Miles;D.H. Schoellhamer;N.D. Athearn

  • Implications for Future Survival of Delta Smelt from Four Climate Change Scenarios for the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California

    Larry R. Brown;William A. Bennett;R. Wayne Wagner;Tara Morgan-King

  • Tidal oscillation of sediment between a river and a bay: A conceptual model

    Neil K Ganju;David H Schoellhamer;John C Warner;Michael F Barad

  • Calibration of an estuarine sediment transport model to sediment fluxes as an intermediate step for simulation of geomorphic evolution

    Neil K. Ganju;Neil K. Ganju;David H. Schoellhamer;David H. Schoellhamer

  • Decadal-Timescale Estuarine Geomorphic Change Under Future Scenarios of Climate and Sediment Supply

    Neil K. Ganju;Neil K. Ganju;David H. Schoellhamer;David H. Schoellhamer

  • Methyl mercury dynamics in a tidal wetland quantified using in situ optical measurements

    Brian A. Bergamaschi;Jacob A. Fleck;Bryan D. Downing;Emmanuel S. Boss

  • Hindcasting of decadal-timescale estuarine bathymetric change with a tidal-timescale model

    Neil K. Ganju;Neil K. Ganju;David H. Schoellhamer;David H. Schoellhamer;Bruce E. Jaffe

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J. Manning
Andrew J. Manning Plymouth University
Neil K. Ganju
Neil K. Ganju United States Geological Survey
John Y. Takekawa
John Y. Takekawa United States Geological Survey
Stephen G. Monismith
Stephen G. Monismith Stanford University
James E. Cloern
James E. Cloern United States Geological Survey
Brian A. Bergamaschi
Brian A. Bergamaschi United States Geological Survey
Susan L. Ustin
Susan L. Ustin University of California, Davis
Michael D. Dettinger
Michael D. Dettinger Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Emmanuel Boss
Emmanuel Boss University of Maine
Alan D. Jassby
Alan D. Jassby University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career opportunities that blend technology, policy, and social sciences. For those interested in mapping and spatial analysis, pursuing gis degree programs offers specialized skills highly valued in environmental planning and conservation.

Policy and administrative roles in environmental sectors benefit from leadership studies found in public administration. Many students opt for the easiest online mpa programs to quickly gain knowledge in management, enabling them to influence sustainability initiatives effectively.

Understanding the societal impact of environmental issues is crucial. Online sociology degrees provide insight into human behavior and social systems. Exploring the best online bachelor degree in sociology programs can complement an environmental science background by highlighting social dimensions of environmental challenges.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise, doctorate programs offer opportunities for leadership and research without the traditional dissertation barrier. Checking out online edd programs no dissertation can be a flexible alternative to deepen knowledge while balancing career demands.

Best Scientists Citing David H. Schoellhamer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles