World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
27036
World Ranking
9648
National Ranking
5087

David F. Caldwell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Caldwell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David F. Caldwell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Caldwell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David F. Caldwell is affiliated with Santa Clara University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including psychology, arts and humanities, and computer science, with publications reported in each of these fields.

The scientist's work covers several subfields of study such as social psychology, literature and literary theory, and human-computer interaction. These areas reflect an interdisciplinary approach that integrates behavioral and technological perspectives.

Among the main topics addressed in Caldwell's publications are adventure sports and sensation seeking, media influence and health, and virtual reality applications and impacts. These themes indicate a focus on human behavior in relation to risk-taking, media effects, and emerging interactive technologies.

Recent publications include the following paper:

  • An argument for updating the sensation seeking scale, 2024, published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Caldwell has coauthored work with several researchers including:

  • Quincy Nauert
  • Vanessa Shirazi
  • Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff

Their work is primarily published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, reflecting engagement with clinical and psychiatric research communities.

Best Publications

  • PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT

    Charles A. O'Reilly;Jennifer Chatman;David F. Caldwell

  • Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance

    Deborah Gladstein Ancona;David F. Caldwell

  • Work group demography, social integration, and turnover.

    Charles A. O'Reilly;David F. Caldwell;William P. Barnett

  • Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process

    David F. Caldwell;Charles A. O'Reilly Iii

  • Building organizational commitment: A multifirm study

    David F. Caldwell;Jennifer A. Chatman;Charles A. O'Reilly

  • The commitment and job tenure of new employees: Some evidence of postdecisional justification.

    Charles A. O'Reilly;David F. Caldwell

  • Beyond Task and Maintenance: Defining External Functions in Groups

    Deborah Gladstein Ancona;David F. Caldwell

  • How leadership matters: The effects of leaders' alignment on strategy implementation

    Charles A. O'Reilly;David F. Caldwell;Jennifer A. Chatman;Margaret Lapiz

  • The Promise and Problems of Organizational Culture: CEO Personality, Culture, and Firm Performance

    Charles A. Iii OReilly;David F. Caldwell;Jennifer A. Chatman;Bernadette Doerr

  • Job choice: The impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on subsequent satisfaction and commitment.

    Charles A. O'Reilly;David F. Caldwell

  • Responses to Failure: The Effects of Choice and Responsibility on Impression Management

    David F. Caldwell;Charles A. O'Reilly

  • Narcissistic CEOs and executive compensation

    Charles A. O'Reilly;Bernadette Doerr;David F. Caldwell;Jennifer A. Chatman

  • Beyond Boundary Spanning: Managing External Dependence in Product Development Teams

    Deborah Gladstein Ancona;David Caldwell

  • Boundary spanning and individual performance: The impact of self-monitoring

    David F. Caldwell;Charles A. O'Reilly

  • Informational influence as a determinant of perceived task characteristics and job satisfaction.

    Charles A. O'Reilly;David F. Caldwell

  • The Determinants of Team-Based Innovation in Organizations The Role of Social Influence

    David F. Caldwell;Charles A. O'Reilly

  • Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high-technology firms

    Jennifer A. Chatman;David F. Caldwell;Charles A. O'Reilly;Bernadette Doerr

  • PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF JOB APPLICANTS AND SUCCESS IN SCREENING INTERVIEWS

    David F. Caldwell;Jerry M. Burger

  • The impact of normative social influence and cohesiveness on task perceptions and attitudes: A social information processing approach

    Charles A. O'reilly;David F. Caldwell

  • Implementing strategic change in a health care system: the importance of leadership and change readiness

    David F. Caldwell;Jennifer Chatman;Charles A. O'Reilly;Margaret Ormiston

  • Firm or subgroup culture: where does fitting in matter most?

    Bryan Adkins;David Caldwell

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles A. O'Reilly
Charles A. O'Reilly Stanford University
Jennifer A. Chatman
Jennifer A. Chatman University of California, Berkeley
Jerry M. Burger
Jerry M. Burger Santa Clara University
Hersh Shefrin
Hersh Shefrin Santa Clara University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of allied degrees and career pathways, especially in social work. Many students find that online social work programs offer flexible options to deepen their understanding of human behavior and help communities. These programs often lead graduates to rewarding roles in counseling, case management, and advocacy.

Various regions offer specialized training and concentrations that complement a foundation in psychology. If you are interested in urban environments with diverse populations, the best social work degree programs in Miami could be ideal. For broader geographic choices and unique community needs, discover the best social work degree programs in the Midwest.

Looking for top-notch programs recognized for their curriculum and job placement? Consider the top social work programs in Minnesota. If your interest lies in serving vulnerable populations in the South, the top social work degrees in Mississippi offer relevant pathways.

Whether through a psychology or social work degree, these options connect you with real-world skills and expanding career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing David F. Caldwell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles