World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
30256
World Ranking
16460
National Ranking
624

Peter W. de Leeuw publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter W. de Leeuw sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 494 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter W. de Leeuw D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter W. de Leeuw sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter W. de Leeuw is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and nursing. A significant focus of their work lies within subfields such as physiology, molecular biology, nephrology, nutrition and dietetics, as well as cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's research topics cover diet and metabolism studies, adipose tissue and metabolism, mitochondrial function and pathology, cancer, hypoxia, and metabolism, parathyroid disorders and treatments, fibroblast growth factor research, and muscle metabolism and nutrition.

Peter W. de Leeuw has contributed to several publications, including:

  • Home and office blood pressure: time to look at the individual patient (2021, Hypertension Research)
  • RENAL EXTRACTION EFFICIENCY FOR PAH IS COMPARABLE IN ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION AND RENAL FIBROMUSCULAR DYSPLASIA (2022, Journal of Hypertension)

Additional papers associated with their frequent co-authors include titles such as "The anabolic role of the Warburg, Cori-cycle and Crabtree effects in health and disease" (2021, Clinical Nutrition) and "Intact and C-Terminal FGF23 Assays-Do Kidney Function, Inflammation, and Low Iron Influence Relationships With Outcomes?" (2020, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism), demonstrating collaborative research efforts.

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Peter B. Soeters
  • Abraham A. Kroon
  • Shilpa Sharma
  • Ronit Katz
  • Alexander L. Bullen

Peter W. de Leeuw publishes routinely in several scientific venues such as Clinical Nutrition, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Hypertension Research, Journal of Hypertension, and the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.

Best Publications

  • Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)

    Morris J Brown;Christopher R Palmer;Alain Castaigne;Peter W de Leeuw

  • European Society of Hypertension Position Paper on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

    Eoin O’Brien;Gianfranco Parati;George Stergiou;Roland Asmar

  • Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension

    Denis L. Clement;Marc L. De Buyzere;Dirk A. De Bacquer;Peter W. de Leeuw

  • European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

    Gianfranco Parati;George S. Stergiou;Eoin O'Brien;Roland P Asmar

  • Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

    Darren B Taichman;Joyce Backus;Christopher Baethge;Howard Bauchner

  • European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.

    Gianfranco Parati;George S. Stergiou;Roland Asmar;Grzegorz Bilo

  • Baroreflex Activation Therapy Lowers Blood Pressure in Patients With Resistant Hypertension Results From the Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Rheos Pivotal Trial

    John D. Bisognano;George Bakris;Mitra K. Nadim;Luis Sanchez

  • Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.

    Walther N K A van Mook;Roger J M W Rennenberg;Geert Willem Schurink;Robert Jan van Oostenbrugge

  • Diagnostic Tests for Renal Artery Stenosis in Patients Suspected of Having Renovascular Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

    G. Boudewijn C. Vasbinder;Patricia J. Nelemans;Alfons G.H. Kessels;Abraham A. Kroon

  • Systolic blood pressure variability as a risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly hypertensive population.

    Edward Pringle;Charles Phillips;Lutgarde Thijs;Christopher Davidson

  • Novel baroreflex activation therapy in resistant hypertension: results of a European multi-center feasibility study.

    Ingrid J. M. Scheffers;Abraham A. Kroon;Juerg Schmidli;Jens Jordan;Jens Jordan

  • First International Consensus on the diagnosis and management of fibromuscular dysplasia.

    Heather L. Gornik;Alexandre Persu;David Adlam;Lucas S. Aparicio

  • Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients treated with indapamide SR 1.5 mg versus enalapril 20 mg: the LIVE study.

    Philippe Gosse;Desmond John Sheridan;Faiez Zannad;Olivier Dubourg

  • Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Diagnosing Renal Artery Stenosis

    G. Boudewijn C. Vasbinder;Patricia J. Nelemans;Alfons G.H. Kessels;Abraham A. Kroon

  • Predictive value of clinic and ambulatory heart rate for mortality in elderly subjects with systolic hypertension

    Paolo Palatini;Lutgarde Thijs;Jan A. Staessen;Robert H. Fagard

  • Response to Antihypertensive Therapy in Older Patients With Sustained and Nonsustained Systolic Hypertension

    Robert H. Fagard;Jan A. Staessen;Lutgarde Thijs;Jerzy Gasowski

  • Increased Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Is Associated With Silent Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease in Hypertensive Patients

    Léon H.G. Henskens;Abraham A. Kroon;Robert J. van Oostenbrugge;Ed H.B.M. Gronenschild

  • The Glu298Asp polymorphism of the NOS 3 gene as a determinant of the baseline production of nitric oxide.

    Bart A Veldman;Wilko Spiering;Peter A Doevendans;Gerald Vervoort

  • Effect of Low-Dose Perindopril/Indapamide on Albuminuria in Diabetes Preterax in Albuminuria Regression: PREMIER

    Carl Erik Mogensen;Giancarlo Viberti;Serge Halimi;Eberhard Ritz

  • Home blood pressure measurement: a systematic review

    Willem J. Verberk;Abraham A. Kroon;Alfons G.H. Kessels;Peter W. de Leeuw

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey M. Drazen
Jeffrey M. Drazen Harvard University
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge Maastricht University
Robert Fagard
Robert Fagard KU Leuven
Eoin O'Brien
Eoin O'Brien University College Dublin
Luis M. Ruilope
Luis M. Ruilope European University of Madrid
Gianfranco Parati
Gianfranco Parati University of Milano-Bicocca
Christopher J. Bulpitt
Christopher J. Bulpitt Imperial College London
Coen D.A. Stehouwer
Coen D.A. Stehouwer Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of medicine offers a range of rewarding online degree options for those looking to shape their future in healthcare. Increasingly, students are seeking flexible pathways that can accelerate entry into vital medical and health professions while balancing life and work responsibilities.

If you're interested in the business and leadership side of healthcare, a healthcare administration online degree can open doors to management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations. For registered nurses aiming to upskill, the asn to fnp programs provide a streamlined bridge from an associate’s degree to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner.

Nutrition also plays a crucial role in preventative medicine and wellness. Earning the best online nutrition degree equips you with the knowledge to promote healthy living and support patient care. Additionally, those striving for leadership, policy, or executive roles may consider top cahme accredited mha programs for advanced training in healthcare administration.

Each of these online degrees supports unique career pathways, allowing you to tailor your education for your ambitions within the medical and healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peter W. de Leeuw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles