World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
25305
World Ranking
11906
National Ranking
6108

Donna M. Peehl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donna M. Peehl sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 309 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Donna M. Peehl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donna M. Peehl sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donna M. Peehl is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant number of publications spanning these fields.

Their scientific work covers various subfields including molecular biology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, oncology, and spectroscopy. This range highlights interdisciplinary expertise, particularly in cancer research and advanced imaging techniques.

Main topics explored in their publications include:

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Boron Compounds in Chemistry
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Donna Peehl include:

  • James D. Brooks
  • Rosalie Nolley
  • Renuka Sriram
  • John Kurhanewicz
  • Nora M. Navone

Donna Peehl publishes regularly in several scientific venues. The top venues include:

  • The Prostate
  • Cancers
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Cancer Research
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by Donna Peehl include:

  • "Trop2 is a driver of metastatic prostate cancer with neuroendocrine phenotype via PARP1," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "The m 6 A RNA demethylase FTO is a HIF-independent synthetic lethal partner with the VHL tumor suppressor," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "SU086, an inhibitor of HSP90, impairs glycolysis and represents a treatment strategy for advanced prostate cancer," 2022, Cell Reports Medicine
  • "Elevated Tumor Lactate and Efflux in High-grade Prostate Cancer demonstrated by Hyperpolarized 13C Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Prostate Tissue Slice Cultures," 2020, Cancers
  • "Resistance to Androgen Deprivation Leads to Altered Metabolism in Human and Murine Prostate Cancer Cell and Tumor Models," 2021, Metabolites

Best Publications

  • Tumor microenvironment derived exosomes pleiotropically modulate cancer cell metabolism

    Hongyun Zhao;Lifeng Yang;Joelle Baddour;Abhinav Achreja

  • Glucocorticoids can promote androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells through a mutated androgen receptor.

    Xiao Yan Zhao;Peter J. Malloy;Aruna V. Krishnan;Srilatha Swami

  • Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is an insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 protease found in seminal plasma.

    Pinchas Cohen;Howard C.B. Graves;Donna M. Peehl;Mehdi Kamarei

  • Vitamin D and prostate cancer: 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors and actions in human prostate cancer cell lines

    R J Skowronski;D M Peehl;D Feldman

  • Antiproliferative Effects of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 on Primary Cultures of Human Prostatic Cells

    Donna M. Peehl;Roman J. Skowronski;Gordon K. Leung;Stephen T. Wong

  • Role of glutathione depletion and reactive oxygen species generation in apoptotic signaling in a human B lymphoma cell line.

    J S Armstrong;K K Steinauer;B Hornung;J M Irish

  • Human cell hybrids: analysis of transformation and tumorigenicity

    Eric J. Stanbridge;Channing J Der;Claus Jens Doersen;Robyn Y. Nishimi

  • Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), IGF receptors, and IGF-binding proteins in primary cultures of prostate epithelial cells.

    Pinchas Cohen;Donna M. Peehl;George Lamson;Ron G. Rosenfeld

  • KERATIN IMMUNOREACTIVITY IN THE BENIGN AND NEOPLASTIC HUMAN PROSTATE

    Michael K. Brawer;Donna M. Peehl;Thomas A. Stamey;David G. Bostwick

  • Elevated expression of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in prostate cancer.

    Maryla Krajewska;Stan Krajewski;Steven Banares;Xianshu Huang

  • Biological effects of prostate specific antigen as an insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 protease.

    P Cohen;D M Peehl;H C B Graves;R G Rosenfeld

  • Regulation of Prostaglandin Metabolism by Calcitriol Attenuates Growth Stimulation in Prostate Cancer Cells

    Jacqueline Moreno;Aruna V. Krishnan;Srilatha Swami;Larisa Nonn

  • Expression of CCL5 (RANTES) and CCR5 in prostate cancer.

    Gayle G. Vaday;Gayle G. Vaday;Donna M. Peehl;Pournima A. Kadam;Diana M. Lawrence

  • Reduced 1α-hydroxylase Activity in Human Prostate Cancer Cells Correlates with Decreased Susceptibility to 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3-induced Growth Inhibition

    Ju-Yu Hsu;David Feldman;John E. McNeal;Donna M. Peehl

  • Actions of vitamin D3, analogs on human prostate cancer cell lines: comparison with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.

    R J Skowronski;D M Peehl;D Feldman

  • Expression and Characterization of Recombinant Type 2 3α-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase (HSD) from Human Prostate: Demonstration of Bifunctional 3α/17β-HSD Activity and Cellular Distribution

    Hsueh Kung Lin;Joseph M. Jez;Brian P. Schlegel;Donna M. Peehl

  • Prostate Specific Antigen Cleaves Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein in the PTH-like Domain: Inactivation of PTHrP-Stimulated cAMP Accumulation in Mouse Osteoblasts

    Scott D. Cramer;Zuxiong Chen;Donna M. Peehl

  • DNA methylation profiling reveals novel biomarkers and important roles for DNA methyltransferases in prostate cancer

    Yuya Kobayashi;Devin M. Absher;Zulfiqar G. Gulzar;Sarah R. Young

  • Inhibition of p38 by Vitamin D Reduces Interleukin-6 Production in Normal Prostate Cells via Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase 5: Implications for Prostate Cancer Prevention by Vitamin D

    Larisa Nonn;Lihong Peng;David Feldman;Donna M. Peehl

  • Antiproliferative and proapoptotic activities of triptolide (PG490), a natural product entering clinical trials, on primary cultures of human prostatic epithelial cells.

    Taija M. Kiviharju;Philip S. Lecane;Robert G. Sellers;Donna M. Peehl

Frequent Co-Authors

David Feldman
David Feldman Stanford University
Thomas A. Stamey
Thomas A. Stamey Stanford University
Pinchas Cohen
Pinchas Cohen University of Southern California
James D. Brooks
James D. Brooks Stanford University
John E. McNeal
John E. McNeal Stanford University
Ron G. Rosenfeld
Ron G. Rosenfeld Oregon Health & Science University
John Kurhanewicz
John Kurhanewicz University of California, San Francisco
Amato J. Giaccia
Amato J. Giaccia Stanford University
Carolyn R. Bertozzi
Carolyn R. Bertozzi Stanford University
David G. Bostwick
David G. Bostwick Bostwick Laboratories

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering studying Medicine in the USA, there are several related online degrees and alternative healthcare career paths to explore. Many students opt for nursing due to its strong job prospects and flexible entry routes. For those looking to skip standardized admissions tests, some programs allow entry via an lpn school without teas test requirement, making it easier to start your nursing journey quickly.

Another popular pathway is healthcare management, where online healthcare administration programs help students fast-track their entry into leadership roles. Nurses with an ADN can further their careers and become nurse practitioners by enrolling in adn to np bridge programs, which are offered online to accommodate working professionals.

Those interested in wellness and disease prevention may consider an online bs in nutrition, opening doors to roles in counseling, research, or community health. Each of these pathways offers unique benefits, flexible study options, and promising career outlooks across the healthcare spectrum.

Best Scientists Citing Donna M. Peehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles