World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 73 5050 4584 1572 1308 278 16810

David F. Davidson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David F. Davidson between 1987 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David F. Davidson published across 37 years, from 1987 to 2023, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2019. 7 of the 302 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2019. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 1 publication
1987 2023

302 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David F. Davidson: publications per year, 1987 to 2023
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 3
1990 4
1991 6
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 4
1996 6
1997 4
1998 2
1999 8
2000 2
2001 3
2002 7
2003 2
2004 7
2005 9
2006 7
2007 11
2008 11
2009 18
2010 12
2011 16
2012 16
2013 18
2014 17
2015 15
2016 12
2017 17
2018 10
2019 26
2020 9
2021 7
2022 6
2023 1
Total 302
Download as CSV

David F. Davidson publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Davidson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 278 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979 278
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

David F. Davidson D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Davidson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561 73
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Organic chemistry
  • Thermodynamics
  • Hydrogen

His scientific interests lie mostly in Shock tube, Analytical chemistry, Shock wave, Ignition system and Thermodynamics. His Shock tube study combines topics in areas such as Decomposition, Laser, Kinetic energy and Shock. His work on Argon as part of general Analytical chemistry study is frequently connected to Reaction rate, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.

His Shock wave research integrates issues from Ignition delay, Absorption and Vapor pressure. His studies in Ignition system integrate themes in fields like Combustion, Simulation and Activation energy. His work on Autoignition temperature, Minimum ignition energy, Propane and Volume as part of general Thermodynamics research is frequently linked to Time data, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His most cited work include:

  • Shock tube determination of ignition delay times in full-blend and surrogate fuel mixtures (428 citations)
  • An improved H2/O2 mechanism based on recent shock tube/laser absorption measurements (197 citations)
  • Kinetics modeling of shock-induced ignition in low-dilution CH4/O2 mixtures at high pressures and intermediate temperatures (196 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Shock tube, Analytical chemistry, Shock wave, Argon and Absorption. The Shock tube study combines topics in areas such as Combustion, Ignition system, Pyrolysis and Laser. His Analytical chemistry research incorporates elements of Decomposition, Atmospheric temperature range, Reaction rate constant, Absorption and Radical.

David F. Davidson combines subjects such as Shock, Aerosol, Atomic physics, Kinetic energy and Vapor pressure with his study of Shock wave. His work carried out in the field of Argon brings together such families of science as Dissociation and Gas laser. The concepts of his Absorption study are interwoven with issues in Wavelength, Absorbance, Methane and Absorption spectroscopy.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Shock tube (69.44%)
  • Analytical chemistry (55.90%)
  • Shock wave (34.03%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Shock tube (69.44%)
  • Analytical chemistry (55.90%)
  • Pyrolysis (17.01%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

David F. Davidson mainly investigates Shock tube, Analytical chemistry, Pyrolysis, Ignition system and Combustion. His Shock tube study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Heptane, Laser and Methane. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Toluene and Absorption.

His studies deal with areas such as Decomposition, Jet fuel and Infrared spectroscopy as well as Pyrolysis. As a member of one scientific family, David F. Davidson mostly works in the field of Ignition system, focusing on Gasoline and, on occasion, Oxygen. His study in Combustion is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Distillation and Kinetic energy.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • A physics-based approach to modeling real-fuel combustion chemistry - I. Evidence from experiments, and thermodynamic, chemical kinetic and statistical considerations (132 citations)
  • A physics-based approach to modeling real-fuel combustion chemistry – II. Reaction kinetic models of jet and rocket fuels (117 citations)
  • A physics-based approach to modeling real-fuel combustion chemistry – IV. HyChem modeling of combustion kinetics of a bio-derived jet fuel and its blends with a conventional Jet A (41 citations)

Best Publications

  • Shock tube determination of ignition delay times in full-blend and surrogate fuel mixtures

    B.M. Gauthier;D.F. Davidson;R.K. Hanson

  • An improved H2/O2 mechanism based on recent shock tube/laser absorption measurements

    Zekai Hong;David F. Davidson;Ronald K. Hanson

  • A physics-based approach to modeling real-fuel combustion chemistry - I. Evidence from experiments, and thermodynamic, chemical kinetic and statistical considerations

    Hai Wang;Rui Xu;Kun Wang;Craig T. Bowman

  • Kinetics modeling of shock-induced ignition in low-dilution CH4/O2 mixtures at high pressures and intermediate temperatures

    E.L. Petersen;D.F. Davidson;R.K. Hanson

  • A physics-based approach to modeling real-fuel combustion chemistry – II. Reaction kinetic models of jet and rocket fuels

    Rui Xu;Kun Wang;Sayak Banerjee;Jiankun Shao

  • Recent advances in laser absorption and shock tube methods for studies of combustion chemistry

    R.K. Hanson;D.F. Davidson

  • An experimental and modeling study of propene oxidation. Part 2: Ignition delay time and flame speed measurements

    Sinead M. Burke;Ultan Burke;Reuben Mc Donagh;Olivier Mathieu

  • Jet fuel ignition delay times: Shock tube experiments over wide conditions and surrogate model predictions

    Subith S. Vasu;David F. Davidson;Ronald K. Hanson

  • Shock tube ignition measurements of iso-octane/air and toluene/air at high pressures

    D.F. Davidson;B.M. Gauthier;R.K. Hanson

  • Interpreting shock tube ignition data

    D. F. Davidson;R. K. Hanson

  • Study of the High-Temperature Autoignition of n-Alkane/O/Ar Mixtures

    D. C. Horning;D. F. Davidson;R. K. Hanson

  • n-Dodecane oxidation at high-pressures: Measurements of ignition delay times and OH concentration time-histories

    S.S. Vasu;D.F. Davidson;Z. Hong;V. Vasudevan

  • A pyrolysis mechanism for ammonia

    David F. Davidson;Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus;Albert Y. Chang;Ronald K. Hanson

  • Experimental study and modeling of shock tube ignition delay times for hydrogen–oxygen–argon mixtures at low temperatures

    G.A. Pang;D.F. Davidson;R.K. Hanson

  • A new shock tube study of the H + O2 → OH + O reaction rate using tunable diode laser absorption of H2O near 2.5 μm

    Z. Hong;D.F. Davidson;E.A. Barbour;R.K. Hanson

  • Reduced Kinetics Mechanisms for Ram Accelerator Combustion

    Eric L. Petersen;Ronald K. Hanson

  • CO concentration and temperature sensor for combustion gases using quantum-cascade laser absorption near 4.7 μm

    W. Ren;A. Farooq;D. F. Davidson;R. K. Hanson

  • Ignition Delay Times of Ram Accelerator CH/O/Diluent Mixtures

    Eric L. Petersen;David F. Davidson;Ronald K. Hanson

  • Shock tube measurements of ignition delay times for the butanol isomers

    Ivo Stranic;Deanna P. Chase;Joseph T. Harmon;Sheng Yang

  • High temperature reaction rate coefficients derived from N-atom ARAS measurements and excimer photolysis of NO

    D. F. Davidson;R. K. Hanson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald K. Hanson
Ronald K. Hanson Stanford University
Matthew A. Oehlschlaeger
Matthew A. Oehlschlaeger Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Eric L. Petersen
Eric L. Petersen Texas A&M University
David M. Golden
David M. Golden SRI International
Christof Schulz
Christof Schulz University of Duisburg-Essen
Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus
Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus Bielefeld University
Charles K. Westbrook
Charles K. Westbrook Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Hai Wang
Hai Wang Stanford University
Fokion N. Egolfopoulos
Fokion N. Egolfopoulos University of Southern California
Tianfeng Lu
Tianfeng Lu University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA can open doors to a variety of career paths, many of which require specialized education and training. For those interested in combining legal knowledge with science, exploring criminal justice associate programs online can provide a strong foundation for roles in regulatory affairs or forensic chemistry.

Another related field is the paralegal profession, where having an understanding of scientific documentation can be advantageous. Pursuing a paralegal salary associate's degree might be appealing for students looking to merge chemistry with legal support roles, offering competitive earnings and diverse opportunities.

For those focused on the pharmaceutical industry, a career as a pharmaceutical sales representative is a popular choice. Understanding how much do pharmaceutical reps make and the skills required can help students decide if this path aligns with their chemistry background and career goals.

Additionally, becoming a pharmacist involves rigorous training and specific qualifications. Checking the detailed pharmacist education requirements is essential for chemistry students interested in clinical applications and patient care roles within healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing David F. Davidson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles