World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anne H. Berman

Anne H. Berman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10894 10193 115 105 162 4524

Anne H. Berman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anne H. Berman between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anne H. Berman published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2017. 23 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2017. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 13 publications
2002 2025

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anne H. Berman: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 3
2008 2
2009 1
2010 8
2011 6
2012 5
2013 9
2014 10
2015 7
2016 9
2017 19
2018 6
2019 13
2020 13
2021 19
2022 11
2023 17
2024 10
2025 13
Total 190
Download as CSV

Anne H. Berman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne H. Berman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 162
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anne H. Berman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne H. Berman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anne H. Berman is affiliated with Uppsala University in Sweden and conducts research primarily within the fields of Psychology and Medicine. The scientist's work focuses extensively on Clinical Psychology as well as Applied Psychology, with additional contributions to General Health Professions, Social Psychology, and Epidemiology.

The main topics covered by the research include Digital Mental Health Interventions, Gambling Behavior and Treatments, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Mental Health Treatment and Access, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology, and broader Mental Health Research Topics.

Recent significant publications include:

  • Transitioning Between Online Gambling Modalities and Decrease in Total Gambling Activity, but No Indication of Increase in Problematic Online Gambling Intensity During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Sweden: A Time Series Forecast Study (2020, Frontiers in Public Health)
  • Internet-based therapy versus face-to-face therapy for alcohol use disorder, a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial (2020, Addiction)
  • The "Outcome Reporting in Brief Intervention Trials: Alcohol" (ORBITAL) Core Outcome Set: International Consensus on Outcomes to Measure in Efficacy and Effectiveness Trials of Alcohol Brief Interventions (2021, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs)
  • Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Harmful Alcohol Use and Alcohol Dependence as Self-help or With Therapist Guidance: Three-Armed Randomized Trial (2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • Compliance with recommendations limiting COVID-19 contagion among university students in Sweden: associations with self-reported symptoms, mental health and academic self-efficacy (2021, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health)

Frequent co-authors working alongside Anne H. Berman include:

  • Olof Molander
  • Claes Andersson
  • Marcus Bendtsen
  • Philip Lindner
  • Petra Lindfors

The main publication venues for this researcher are:

  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • BMJ Open
  • Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • BMC Research Notes

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) in Criminal Justice and Detoxification Settings and in a Swedish Population Sample

    Anne H. Berman;Hans Bergman;Tom Palmstierna;Frans Schlyter

  • Effectiveness and treatment moderators of internet interventions for adult problem drinking: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 19 randomised controlled trials

    Heleen Riper;Adriaan Hoogendoorn;Pim Cuijpers;Eirini Karyotaki

  • Mobile phone brief intervention applications for risky alcohol use among university students: a randomized controlled study

    Mikael Gajecki;Anne H Berman;Kristina Sinadinovic;Ingvar Rosendahl

  • The self-report Drug Use Disorders Identification Test: Extended (DUDIT-E): reliability, validity, and motivational index.

    Anne H. Berman;Tom Palmstierna;Tom Palmstierna;Håkan Källmén;Hans Bergman

  • Children of Prisoners: Interventions and mitigations to strengthen mental health

    Adele Jones;Bernard Gallagher;Martin Manby;Oliver Robertson

  • Children’s quality of life based on the KIDSCREEN-27: Child self-report, parent ratings and child-parent agreement in a Swedish random population sample

    Anne H. Berman;Bojing Liu;Sara Ullman;Isabel Jadbäck

  • The Reasoning and Rehabilitation Program: Assessing Short- and Long-Term Outcomes among Male Swedish Prisoners.

    Anne H. Berman

  • A Test of the Validity of the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code

    Lars Forsberg;Anne H. Berman;Håkan Källmén;Ulric Hermansson

  • Virtual Patients in a Behavioral Medicine Massive Open Online Course (MOOC): A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Participants' Perceptions.

    Anne H. Berman;Gabriele Biguet;Natalia Stathakarou;Beata Westin-Hägglöf

  • Validation of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test in a Swedish sample of suspected offenders with signs of mental health problems: Results from the Mental Disorder, Substance Abuse and Crime study

    Natalie Durbeej;Anne H. Berman;Clara H. Gumpert;Tom Palmstierna

  • Internet-based assessment and self-monitoring of problematic alcohol and drug use.

    Kristina Sinadinovic;Anne H. Berman;Dan Hasson;Dan Hasson;Peter Wennberg;Peter Wennberg

  • Targeting individuals with problematic alcohol use via Web-based cognitive-behavioral self-help modules, personalized screening feedback or assessment only: a randomized controlled trial.

    Kristina Sinadinovic;Peter Wennberg;Magnus Johansson;Anne H Berman

  • Single-Session Motivational Interviewing for Drug Detoxification Inpatients: Effects on Self-Efficacy, Stages of Change and Substance Use

    Anne H Berman;Lars Forsberg;Natalie Durbeej;Håkan Källmén

  • Mobile Interventions Targeting Risky Drinking Among University Students: A Review.

    Anne H Berman;Michael Gajecki;Kristina Sinadinovic;Claes Andersson

  • Coding Counsellor Behaviour in Motivational Interviewing Sessions: Inter‐Rater Reliability for the Swedish Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code (MITI)

    Lars Forsberg;Håkan Källmén;Ulric Hermansson;Anne H. Berman

  • Treating drug using prison inmates with auricular acupuncture: a randomized controlled trial.

    Anne H Berman;Anne H Berman;Ulf Lundberg;Ulf Lundberg;Aud L Krook;Carl Gyllenhammar

  • Alcohol habits in Sweden during 1997-2005 measured with the AUDIT.

    Håkan Källmén;Peter Wennberg;Anne H. Berman;Hans Bergman

  • Guided and Unguided Internet-Based Treatment for Problematic Alcohol Use – A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

    Christopher Sundström;Mikael Gajecki;Magnus Johansson;Matthijs Blankers

  • Alcohol Habits in Sweden during 1997–2009 with Particular Focus on 2005 and 2009, Assessed with the AUDIT: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study

    Hakan Kallmen;Peter Wennberg;Hakan Leifman;Hans Bergman

  • Skills Training via Smartphone App for University Students with Excessive Alcohol Consumption: a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Mikael Gajecki;Claes Andersson;Ingvar Rosendahl;Kristina Sinadinovic

  • Transitioning Between Online Gambling Modalities and Decrease in Total Gambling Activity, but No Indication of Increase in Problematic Online Gambling Intensity During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Sweden: A Time Series Forecast Study

    Philip Lindner;David Forsström;David Forsström;Jakob Jonsson;Anne H. Berman;Anne H. Berman

Frequent Co-Authors

Per Carlbring
Per Carlbring Stockholm University
Paul K. Wallace
Paul K. Wallace Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Mike Clarke
Mike Clarke Queen's University Belfast
Bridgette M. Bewick
Bridgette M. Bewick University of Leeds
Sven Andréasson
Sven Andréasson Karolinska Institute
Sion Kim Harris
Sion Kim Harris Boston Children's Hospital
John A. Cunningham
John A. Cunningham Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Viktor Kaldo
Viktor Kaldo Karolinska Institute
John R. Knight
John R. Knight Boston Children's Hospital
Constance Weisner
Constance Weisner Kaiser Permanente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a range of flexible educational and career options. Many accredited universities now offer fully online programs, allowing you to balance your studies with work or family responsibilities. When choosing a program, it's important to consider factors like faculty expertise, course offerings, and national rankings.

Local rankings can provide valuable insights into opportunities near you. For example, the best psychology program rankings in Reno highlight leading options in the Reno area, while the best psychology program rankings in South Dakota showcase top schools throughout the state. If you're considering options in Louisiana, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Shreveport can help you compare choices locally.

For a broader perspective, reviewing the best psychology degree programs ranking in America provides a nationwide overview of highly regarded programs. Whichever path you choose, graduates in psychology can look forward to careers in counseling, research, education, and various specialty areas.

Best Scientists Citing Anne H. Berman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles