World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
26123
World Ranking
12331
National Ranking
398

George Jerums publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Jerums sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 409 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

George Jerums D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Jerums sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

George Jerums is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Medicine and Nursing, with a focus on subfields such as Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Physiology.

The scientist's recent scholarly contributions include a paper entitled "Dietary sodium and potassium intake in people with diabetes: are guidelines being met?", published in 2020 in the journal Nutrition and Diabetes. This publication has accrued citations reflecting engagement from the scientific community.

George Jerums's research themes cover several topics, including:

  • Sodium Intake and Health
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Thermoregulation and physiological responses

Frequent publication venues indicate a concentration in journals related to nutrition, specifically:

  • Nutrition and Diabetes

Collaboration is a component of Jerums's work, with repeated co-authors including:

  • Sara Baqar
  • Adrian Michalopoulos
  • Elif I. Ekinci

This data outlines a research profile engaging with critical health issues related to diet, particularly concerning sodium intake and its physiological implications. The interdisciplinary nature of their work spans clinical nutrition, public health, and physiological studies, grounded by contributions to peer-reviewed literature focused on diabetes and nutritional guidelines.

Best Publications

  • Reduced bone mass in daughters of women with osteoporosis.

    Ego Seeman;John L. Hopper;Leon A. Bach;Mark E. Cooper

  • Prevention of diabetic renal disease with special reference to microalbuminuria

    Carl Erik Mogensen;William F. Keane;Peter H. Bennett;George Jerums

  • Naturally Occurring Human Urinary Peptides for Use in Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease

    David M. Good;Petra Zürbig;Àngel Argilés;Hartwig W. Bauer

  • Advanced glycation end products cause epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation via the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE)

    Matthew D Oldfield;Leon A Bach;Josephine M Forbes;David J Nikolic-Paterson

  • Retardation by Aminoguanidine of Development of Albuminuria, Mesangial Expansion, and Tissue Fluorescence in Streptozocin-Induced Diabetic Rat

    Tina Soulis-Liparota;Mark Cooper;Dimitria Papazoglou;Belinda Clarke

  • Low Testosterone Levels Are Common and Associated with Insulin Resistance in Men with Diabetes

    Mathis Grossmann;Merlin C. Thomas;Merlin C. Thomas;Sianna Panagiotopoulos;Ken Sharpe

  • Nonalbuminuric Renal Insufficiency in Type 2 Diabetes

    Ricfiard J. Macisaac;Con Tsalamandris;Sianna Panagiotopoulos;Trudy J. Smith

  • Unrecognized anemia in patients with diabetes: a cross-sectional survey.

    Merlin C. Thomas;Richard J. Macisaac;C. O. N. Tsalamandris;David Power

  • Markers of and Risk Factors for the Development and Progression of Diabetic Kidney Disease

    Richard J. MacIsaac;Richard J. MacIsaac;Elif I. Ekinci;George Jerums

  • The reliability of the 1RM strength test for untrained middle-aged individuals.

    Itamar Levinger;Craig Goodman;David L Hare;George Jerums

  • Reduction of the Accumulation of Advanced Glycation End Products by ACE Inhibition in Experimental Diabetic Nephropathy

    Josephine M. Forbes;Josephine M. Forbes;Mark E. Cooper;Vicki Thallas;Wendy C. Burns

  • Dietary Salt Intake and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

    Elif I. Ekinci;Sophie Clarke;Merlin C. Thomas;John L. Moran

  • Expression of transforming growth factor-beta1 and type IV collagen in the renal tubulointerstitium in experimental diabetes: effects of ACE inhibition.

    Richard E Gilbert;Allison J Cox;L L Wu;Terri J Allen

  • The breakdown of preexisting advanced glycation end products is associated with reduced renal fibrosis in experimental diabetes

    Josephine M. Forbes;Vicki Thallas;Merlin C. Thomas;Hank W. Founds

  • Comparison between perindopril and nifedipine in hypertensive and normotensive diabetic patients with microalbuminuria

    T. Allen;M. Cooper;G. Jerums;M. De Luise

  • Urinary Proteomics for Early Diagnosis in Diabetic Nephropathy

    Petra Zürbig;George Jerums;Peter Hovind;Richard J. MacIsaac

  • Modulation of Soluble Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products by Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-1 Inhibition in Diabetic Nephropathy

    Josephine M. Forbes;Suzanne R. Thorpe;Vicki Thallas-Bonke;Josefa Pete

  • Vascular hypertrophy in experimental diabetes. Role of advanced glycation end products.

    Jonathan R. Rumble;Mark E. Cooper;Tina Soulis;Alison Cox

  • A multicenter, double-blind, one-year study comparing safety and efficacy of atorvastatin versus simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia

    Anthony Dart;George Jerums;Geoffrey Nicholson;Michael d'Emden

  • Chronic kidney disease and measurement of albuminuria or proteinuria: a position statement.

    David W Johnson;Graham R D Jones;Timothy H Mathew;Marie J Ludlow

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark E. Cooper
Mark E. Cooper Monash University
Merlin C. Thomas
Merlin C. Thomas Monash University
Richard E. Gilbert
Richard E. Gilbert St. Michael's Hospital
Josephine M. Forbes
Josephine M. Forbes University of Queensland
Ego Seeman
Ego Seeman University of Melbourne
Alan Cass
Alan Cass Charles Darwin University
Kerin O'Dea
Kerin O'Dea University of South Australia
Darren J. Kelly
Darren J. Kelly Ascension Health
Peter Rossing
Peter Rossing University of Copenhagen
Robert C. Atkins
Robert C. Atkins Monash Medical Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in related medical careers or seeking flexible study options, there are a variety of online degrees and fast-track programs available. Nurses looking to move into advanced practice may consider enrolling in one of the easiest dnp programs. These pathways allow registered nurses to achieve the highest level of clinical practice and leadership with streamlined admission requirements and manageable course loads.

Alternatively, individuals eager to start their nursing careers quickly can explore a fast lpn program. These accelerated options prepare students to become licensed practical nurses in less time through concentrated online coursework and clinical experiences.

For those interested in mental health, the fastest psych np program is a great route to becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, blending online curriculum with expedited clinical training to meet the growing demand for mental health providers.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care. The healthcare administration degree online offers students the chance to move into leadership and management roles in hospitals and medical organizations—all from a flexible, cost-effective online platform.

Best Scientists Citing George Jerums

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles