World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8478
World Ranking
6052
National Ranking
2191

Steven M. Quiring publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Quiring sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 177 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Steven M. Quiring D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Quiring sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven M. Quiring is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research predominantly falls within the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, Water Science and Technology, and Civil and Structural Engineering.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics such as Climate Variability and Models, Hydrology and Drought Analysis, Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Soil and Unsaturated Flow, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research.

Quiring has contributed multiple articles to frequent publication venues, which include:

  • Journal of Hydrometeorology
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Water Resources Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Quiring include:

  • Major impacts of weather events on the electrical power delivery system in the United States, 2020, Energy
  • Identifying the Dominant Drivers of Hydrological Change in the Contiguous United States, 2021, Water Resources Research
  • Developing a strategy for the national coordinated soil moisture monitoring network, 2021, Vadose Zone Journal
  • Elevated risk of tropical cyclone precipitation and pluvial flood in Houston under global warming, 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • Assessing United States County-Level Exposure for Research on Tropical Cyclones and Human Health, 2020, Environmental Health Perspectives

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Quiring include:

  • Shanshui Yuan
  • Trent W. Ford
  • Zachary Leasor
  • Laiyin Zhu
  • Zhiying Li

Best Publications

  • A review of environmental droughts: Increased risk under global warming?

    Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano;Steven M. Quiring;Marina Peña-Gallardo;Shanshui Yuan

  • An evaluation of agricultural drought indices for the Canadian prairies

    Steven M. Quiring;Timothy N. Papakryiakou

  • Evaluating the utility of the Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) for monitoring meteorological drought in Texas

    Steven M. Quiring;Srinivasan Ganesh

  • Soil moisture: A central and unifying theme in physical geography:

    David R. Legates;Rezaul Mahmood;Delphis F. Levia;Tracy L. DeLiberty

  • Comparison and validation of statistical methods for predicting power outage durations in the event of hurricanes.

    Roshanak Nateghi;Seth D. Guikema;Steven M. Quiring

  • Predicting Hurricane Power Outages to Support Storm Response Planning

    Seth David Guikema;Roshanak Nateghi;Steven M. Quiring;Andrea Staid

  • Estimating the spatial distribution of power outages during hurricanes in the Gulf coast region

    Seung Ryong Han;Seth D. Guikema;Steven M. Quiring;Kyung Ho Lee

  • Developing Objective Operational Definitions for Monitoring Drought

    Steven M. Quiring

  • Evaluation of six indices for monitoring agricultural drought in the south-central United States

    Liyan Tian;Shanshui Yuan;Steven M. Quiring

  • Monitoring Drought: An Evaluation of Meteorological Drought Indices

    Steven M. Quiring

  • Estimating root zone soil moisture using near-surface observations from SMOS

    T. W. Ford;E. Harris;S. M. Quiring

  • Comparison of contemporary in situ, model, and satellite remote sensing soil moisture with a focus on drought monitoring.

    Trent W. Ford;Steven M. Quiring

  • On the utility of in situ soil moisture observations for flash drought early warning in Oklahoma, USA

    Trent W. Ford;D. Brent McRoberts;Steven M. Quiring;Ryann E. Hall

  • Power outage estimation for tropical cyclones: improved accuracy with simpler models.

    Roshanak Nateghi;Seth Guikema;Steven M. Quiring

  • Prestorm Estimation of Hurricane Damage to Electric Power Distribution Systems

    Seth D. Guikema;Steven M. Quiring;Seung Ryong Han

  • Improving the Predictive Accuracy of Hurricane Power Outage Forecasts Using Generalized Additive Models

    Seung Ryong Han;Seth D. Guikema;Steven M. Quiring

  • The North American Soil Moisture Database: Development and Applications

    Steven M. Quiring;Trenton Wayne Ford;Jessssica K. Wang;Angela Khong

  • Confronting Weather and Climate Models with Observational Data from Soil Moisture Networks over the United States

    Paul A. Dirmeyer;Jiexia Wu;Holly E. Norton;Wouter A. Dorigo

  • Hybrid data mining-regression for infrastructure risk assessment based on zero-inflated data

    Seth D. Guikema;Steven M. Quiring

  • Response of crop yield to different time-scales of drought in the United States: Spatio-temporal patterns and climatic and environmental drivers

    Marina Peña-Gallardo;Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano;Steven Quiring;Marc Svoboda

  • Forecasting hurricane-induced power outage durations

    Roshanak Nateghi;Roshanak Nateghi;Seth D. Guikema;Steven M. Quiring

  • Comparison of NLDAS-2 Simulated and NASMD Observed Daily Soil Moisture. Part I: Comparison and Analysis

    Youlong Xia;Michael B. Ek;Yihua Wu;Trent Ford

Frequent Co-Authors

Seth D. Guikema
Seth D. Guikema University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ning Zhang
Ning Zhang Tsinghua University
Tyson Ochsner
Tyson Ochsner Oklahoma State University
Mark Svoboda
Mark Svoboda University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Michael Ek
Michael Ek National Center for Atmospheric Research
Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano
Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano Spanish National Research Council
Jamie Hannaford
Jamie Hannaford National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Ahmed El Kenawy
Ahmed El Kenawy Mansoura University
Youlong Xia
Youlong Xia M-Systems
David R. Legates
David R. Legates University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees that complement and expand career opportunities. For those interested in public administration and policy roles linked to environmental management, exploring the best online MPA programs provides accelerated options to gain leadership skills in government and nonprofit sectors.

Social dynamics play a crucial role in environmental issues, making a degree in sociology highly relevant. The best online bachelor degree in sociology programs offer flexible learning paths that deepen understanding of human-environment interactions, community behaviors, and sustainable social practices.

For seasoned professionals aiming for advanced expertise, pursuing doctoral studies without traditional barriers is possible. Several doctoral programs online no dissertation allow learners to complete doctoral degrees through alternative research or project-based requirements, saving time while maintaining rigor.

Additionally, education professionals focused on environmental education can benefit from streamlined transitions in higher education. Programs featured in eds to edd program offer online pathways that support continuous growth from master's level to doctoral credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Steven M. Quiring

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles