World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 52 5104 4965 231 224 296 10374

Ulf Leser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ulf Leser between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ulf Leser published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2009. 22 of the 393 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2009. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

393 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ulf Leser: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 5
1999 10
2000 3
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 8
2005 15
2006 13
2007 8
2008 13
2009 27
2010 18
2011 11
2012 16
2013 16
2014 14
2015 16
2016 17
2017 17
2018 18
2019 16
2020 16
2021 19
2022 20
2023 26
2024 25
2025 21
2026 1
Total 393
Download as CSV

Ulf Leser publications per year - data summary

  • Ulf Leser, a Computer Science scholar from Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, has 393 publications recorded across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 27 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997, 2001 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 30 years in the span carries no publications at all (2002).
  • The rate of publication averages 13.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 13.6 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 93 publications, 24% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 58 publications (5.8 per year); 2007-2016: 156 publications (15.6 per year); 2017-2026: 179 publications (17.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ulf Leser publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf Leser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 292–301 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 296 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293 296
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Ulf Leser publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Ulf Leser, a Computer Science scholar from Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, records 296 publications - the 73rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 73% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Ulf Leser, and about 27% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Ulf Leser ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Ulf Leser D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf Leser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 52
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Ulf Leser D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Ulf Leser, a Computer Science scholar from Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, records 52 D-Index - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Ulf Leser, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Ulf Leser ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Ulf Leser is affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany. Their research spans primarily across computer science, with a significant focus on artificial intelligence as well as molecular biology. Other notable subfields include computer networks and communications, signal processing, and information systems and management.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as biomedical text mining and ontologies, topic modeling, scientific computing and data management, time series analysis and forecasting, distributed and parallel computing systems, anomaly detection techniques and applications, and natural language processing techniques.

Ulf Leser's publication record includes papers in various respected venues. Among the recent works are these papers:

  • "Leveraging Large Language Models for Decision Support in Personalized Oncology" (2023, JAMA Network Open)
  • "Earthquake magnitude and location estimation from real time seismic waveforms with a transformer network" (2021, Geophysical Journal International)
  • "The transformer earthquake alerting model: a new versatile approach to earthquake early warning" (2020, Geophysical Journal International)
  • "Finding k-shortest paths with limited overlap" (2020, The VLDB Journal)
  • "TEASER: early and accurate time series classification" (2020, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery)

They have frequently published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Bioinformatics, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, and the Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment.

Ulf Leser has collaborated regularly with a set of coauthors including Fabian Lehmann, Samuele Garda, Mario Sänger, Leon Weber, and Arik Ermshaus. These coauthors appear often across many publications, indicating sustained research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Querying distributed RDF data sources with SPARQL

    Bastian Quilitz;Ulf Leser

  • The Stratosphere platform for big data analytics

    Alexander Alexandrov;Rico Bergmann;Stephan Ewen;Johann-Christoph Freytag

  • Deep learning with word embeddings improves biomedical named entity recognition.

    Maryam Habibi;Leon Weber;Mariana L. Neves;David Luis Wiegandt

  • ChemSpot: a hybrid system for chemical named entity recognition

    Tim Rocktäschel;Michael Weidlich;Ulf Leser

  • Fast and practical indexing and querying of very large graphs

    Silke Trißl;Ulf Leser

  • Fast and Accurate Time Series Classification with WEASEL

    Patrick Schäfer;Ulf Leser

  • Quality-driven Integration of Heterogenous Information Systems

    Felix Naumann;Ulf Leser;Johann Christoph Freytag

  • Federated Information Systems: Concepts, Terminology and Architectures

    Susanne Busse;Ralf-Detlef Kutsche;Ulf Leser;Herbert Weber

  • What makes a gene name? Named entity recognition in the biomedical literature.

    Ulf Leser;Jörg Hakenberg

  • A Comprehensive Benchmark of Kernel Methods to Extract Protein–Protein Interactions from Literature

    Domonkos Tikk;Philippe E. Thomas;Peter Palaga;Jörg Hakenberg

  • Completeness of integrated information sources

    Felix Naumann;Johann-Christoph Freytag;Ulf Leser

  • AliBaba: PubMed as a graph

    Conrad Plake;Torsten Schiemann;Marcus Pankalla;Jörg Hakenberg

  • Informationsintegration: Architekturen und Methoden zur Integration verteilter und heterogener Datenquellen.

    Ulf Leser;Felix Naumann

  • DynamicCloudSim: Simulating heterogeneity in computational clouds

    Marc Bux;Ulf Leser

  • A query language for biological networks

    Ulf Leser

  • A Flexible Framework for Integrating Annotations from Different Tools and Tag Sets

    Christian Chiarcos;Stefanie Dipper;Michael Götze;Ulf Leser

  • A hierarchical approach to model web query interfaces for web source integration

    Eduard C. Dragut;Thomas Kabisch;Clement Yu;Ulf Leser

  • Regular path queries on large graphs

    André Koschmieder;Ulf Leser

  • BioCreative III interactive task: an overview.

    Cecilia N Arighi;Phoebe M Roberts;Shashank Agarwal;Sanmitra Bhattacharya

  • Earthquake magnitude and location estimation from real time seismic waveforms with a transformer network

    Jannes Münchmeyer;Dino Bindi;Ulf Leser;Frederik Tilmann

  • Multivariate Time Series Classification with WEASEL+MUSE

    Patrick Schäfer;Ulf Leser

  • Simple tricks for improving pattern-based information extraction from the biomedical literature

    Quang Long Nguyen;Domonkos Tikk;Domonkos Tikk;Ulf Leser

Frequent Co-Authors

Felix Naumann
Felix Naumann Hasso Plattner Institute
Domonkos Tikk
Domonkos Tikk Gravity Research & Development Zrt.
Christine Sers
Christine Sers Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael Hummel
Michael Hummel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Reinhold Schäfer
Reinhold Schäfer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Frederik Tilmann
Frederik Tilmann Freie Universität Berlin
Dino Bindi
Dino Bindi University of Potsdam
Tim Rocktäschel
Tim Rocktäschel University College London
Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann
Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann University of Cologne
Hans Lehrach
Hans Lehrach Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide spectrum of degree and career options. Students often consider which majors best align with their passion for technology and future plans. Specializations in data science, cybersecurity, and software engineering are currently in high demand.

For those advancing their education, understanding what's the easiest masters degree to get can help streamline your educational journey, particularly for working professionals balancing other commitments.

Affordability is another major consideration. Many students search for a cheap online phd to manage costs while gaining advanced expertise. Alternatively, if time is a factor, you might be interested in the fastest online edd programs for rapid completion.

With so many flexible pathways available, both in terms of specialization and degree level, students can tailor their Computer Science studies for optimal career success.

Best Scientists Citing Ulf Leser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles