World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
13530
World Ranking
7705
National Ranking
4126

John E. Richters publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Richters sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 53 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John E. Richters D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Richters sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John E. Richters is a researcher affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, psychology, and medicine. Within these overarching areas, Richters explores specialized subfields such as genetics, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and physiology.

The scientist's research addresses a variety of topics, including mental health research, cultural differences and values, cognitive abilities and testing, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, lysosomal storage disorders, and the intersection of race, genetics, and society.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Incredible Utility: The Lost Causes and Causal Debris of Psychological Science, 2021, published in Basic and Applied Social Psychology
  • Mutations in sphingolipid metabolism genes are associated with ADHD, 2020, published in Translational Psychiatry
  • Methodological question-begging about the causes of complex social traits, 2023, published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Frequent collaborators in Richters' research include Brooke S. G. Molina, Marcela Henríquez-Henríquez, Maria T. Acosta, Ariel F. Martinez, and Jorge I. Vélez.

Their work has appeared multiple times in journals such as Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Translational Psychiatry, and Behavioral and Brain Sciences, reflecting a consistent presence in these publication venues.

Best Publications

  • The Nimh Community Violence Project: I. Children as Victims of and Witnesses to Violence

    J. E. Richters;Purificacion Martinez

  • DSM-IV field trials for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.

    Benjamin B. Lahey;Brooks Applegate;Keith McBurnett;Joseph Biederman

  • Depressed mothers as informants about their children: a critical review of the evidence for distortion.

    John E. Richters

  • The NIMH community violence project: ii. Children's distress symptoms associated with violence exposure

    Purificacion Martinez;J. E. Richters

  • What aspects of peer relationships are impaired in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?

    Betsy Hoza;Sylvie Mrug;Alyson C. Gerdes;Stephen P. Hinshaw

  • Violent communities, family choices, and children's chances: An algorithm for improving the odds

    John E. Richters;Pedro E. Martinez

  • NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD: I. Background and Rationale

    John E. Richters;L. Eugene Arnold;Peter S. Jensen;Howard Abikoff

  • Marital adjustment, parental disagreements about child rearing, and behavior problems in boys: Increasing the specificity of the marital assessment.

    Ernest N. Jouriles;Christopher M. Murphy;Annette M. Farris;David A. Smith

  • Depressed mothers' judgments about their children: an examination of the depression-distortion hypothesis.

    John Richters;David S. Pellegrini

  • Test-retest reliability of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1). Parent, child, and combined algorithms.

    Peter Jensen;Margaret Roper;Prudence Fisher;John Piacentini

  • National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD (the MTA): Design Challenges and Choices

    L E Arnold;H B Abikoff;D P Cantwell;C K Conners

  • Functional Adult Outcomes 16 Years After Childhood Diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: MTA Results.

    Lily Hechtman;James M. Swanson;Margaret H. Sibley;Annamarie Stehli

  • Young adult outcomes in the follow‐up of the multimodal treatment study of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: symptom persistence, source discrepancy, and height suppression

    James M. Swanson;L. Eugene Arnold;Brooke S.G. Molina;Margaret H. Sibley

  • The NIMH methods for the epidemiology of child and adolescent mental disorders (MECA) study: Background and methodology

    Benjamin B. Lahey;Elaine W. Flagg;Hector R. Bird;Mary E. Schwab-Stone

  • Learning to love: Mechanisms and milestones.

    Everett Waters;Kiyomi Kondo-Ikemura;German Posada;John E. Richters

  • Anxiety and depressive disorders in attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity: New findings.

    Peter S. Jensen;Robert E. Shervette;Stephen N. Xenakis;John Richters

  • Defining ADHD symptom persistence in adulthood: optimizing sensitivity and specificity

    Margaret H. Sibley;James M. Swanson;L. Eugene Arnold;Lily T. Hechtman

  • Global measures of impairment for epidemiologic and clinical use with children and adolescents.

    Hector R. Bird;Howard Andrews;Mary Schwab‐Stone;Sherryl Goodman

  • The Hubble hypothesis and the developmentalist's dilemma.

    John E. Richters

  • Comprehensive assessment of childhood Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in the context of a multisite, multimodal clinical trial:

    S.P. Hinshaw;J.S. March;J.S. March;H. Abikoff;L.E. Arnold;L.E. Arnold

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter S. Jensen
Peter S. Jensen REACH Institute
Stephen P. Hinshaw
Stephen P. Hinshaw University of California, Berkeley
Lily Hechtman
Lily Hechtman Montreal Children's Hospital
Jeffrey H. Newcorn
Jeffrey H. Newcorn Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Karen C. Wells
Karen C. Wells Duke University
Hector R. Bird
Hector R. Bird Columbia University
James M. Swanson
James M. Swanson University of California, Irvine
Sherryl H. Goodman
Sherryl H. Goodman Emory University
Everett Waters
Everett Waters Stony Brook University
Helena C. Kraemer
Helena C. Kraemer Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Psychology in the USA, there are many related online degrees that can open doors to rewarding career pathways—particularly in social work. Each state has specific requirements for those looking to become social workers, and these often start with a bachelor’s or master’s degree in Social Work or a related field.

For example, the degree needed to be a social worker in New Hampshire typically includes a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) at minimum, while advanced roles require a Master of Social Work (MSW). Similarly, the New Jersey education requirements for social workers emphasize accredited social work programs and supervised clinical experience.

Requirements vary by location; for example, the degree needed to be a social worker in New Mexico and social worker degree requirements in New York both stress the value of state-licensed, accredited degrees and practical experience. Many universities now provide flexible online options, making it easier to start or advance your career in psychology and social work while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing John E. Richters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles