World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Schroeder

Michael Schroeder

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
13577
World Ranking
7399
National Ranking
361

Michael Schroeder publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Schroeder sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 226 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Schroeder D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Schroeder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - ACM Fellow For contributions to distributed computing systems, security, and networking.

Overview

Michael Schroeder is affiliated with TU Dresden in Germany and focuses their research primarily in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Medicine. Their work spans molecular biology, computational theory and mathematics, genetics, infectious diseases, and artificial intelligence as subfields of study.

The scientist's research covers several key topics including computational drug discovery methods, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, protein structure and dynamics, machine learning applications in bioinformatics, RNA modifications and cancer, bioinformatics and genomic networks, and bacterial genetics and biotechnology.

Michael Schroeder has contributed to multiple publications in notable scientific journals. Some recent papers include:

  • PLIP 2021: expanding the scope of the protein-ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA, 2021, Nucleic Acids Research
  • Drug repositioning or target repositioning: A structural perspective of drug-target-indication relationship for available repurposed drugs, 2020, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
  • Toward an Understanding of Pan-Assay Interference Compounds and Promiscuity: A Structural Perspective on Binding Modes, 2021, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • Structure-based drug repositioning: Potential and limits, 2020, Seminars in Cancer Biology
  • Explainable AI to improve acceptance of convolutional neural networks for automatic classification of dopamine transporter SPECT in the diagnosis of clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndromes, 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Their frequent co-authors include Ali Al-Fatlawi, Sarah Naomi Bolz, V. Joachim Haupt, Sebastian Salentin, and Melissa F. Adasme.

Michael Schroeder publishes regularly in various scientific venues, with several papers appearing in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, and Nucleic Acids Research.

Best Publications

  • PLIP – Fully automated Protein-Ligand Interaction Profiler

    Sebastian Salentin;Sven Schreiber;V. Joachim Haupt;Melissa F. Adasme

  • PLIP 2021: expanding the scope of the protein-ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA.

    Melissa F Adasme;Katja L Linnemann;Sarah Naomi Bolz;Florian Kaiser

  • GoPubMed : exploring pubMed with the Gene Ontology

    Andreas Doms;Michael Schroeder

  • An overview of the BIOASQ large-scale biomedical semantic indexing and question answering competition

    George Tsatsaronis;Georgios Balikas;Prodromos Malakasiotis;Ioannis Partalas

  • LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation

    Bingding Huang;Michael Schroeder

  • A novel informatics concept for high-throughput shotgun lipidomics based on the molecular fragmentation query language

    Ronny Herzog;Ronny Herzog;Dominik Schwudke;Dominik Schwudke;Kai Schuhmann;Kai Schuhmann;Julio L Sampaio

  • LipidXplorer: a software for consensual cross-platform lipidomics.

    Ronny Herzog;Kai Schuhmann;Dominik Schwudke;Julio L. Sampaio

  • Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction

    Zengming Zhang;Yu Li;Biaoyang Lin;Michael Schroeder

  • SuperCYP: a comprehensive database on Cytochrome P450 enzymes including a tool for analysis of CYP-drug interactions

    Saskia Preissner;Katharina Kroll;Mathias Dunkel;Christian Senger

  • A roadmap of clustering algorithms: finding a match for a biomedical application

    Bill Andreopoulos;Aijun An;Xiaogang Wang;Michael Schroeder

  • Google goes cancer: improving outcome prediction for cancer patients by network-based ranking of marker genes.

    Christof Winter;Glen Kristiansen;Stephan Kersting;Janine Roy

  • SCOPPI: a structural classification of protein-protein interfaces.

    Christof Winter;Andreas Henschel;Wan Kyu Kim;Michael Schroeder

  • Negotiation in multi-agent systems

    Martin Beer;Mark D'inverno;Michael Luck;Nick Jennings

  • Unraveling protein networks with power graph analysis.

    Loïc Royer;Matthias Reimann;Bill Andreopoulos;Michael Schroeder

  • Drug Promiscuity in PDB: Protein Binding Site Similarity Is Key.

    V. Joachim Haupt;Simone Daminelli;Michael Schroeder

  • Old friends in new guise: repositioning of known drugs with structural bioinformatics

    V. Joachim Haupt;Michael Schroeder

  • Market-based Resource Allocation for Grid Computing: A Model and Simulation.

    Jacek Gomoluch;Michael Schroeder

  • Drug target prioritization by perturbed gene expression and network information.

    Zerrin Isik;Christoph Baldow;Carlo Vittorio Cannistraci;Michael Schroeder

  • Agents in bioinformatics, computational and systems biology

    Emanuela Merelli;Giuliano Armano;Nicola Cannata;Flavio Corradini

  • Inter-species normalization of gene mentions with GNAT

    Jörg Hakenberg;Conrad Plake;Robert Leaman;Michael Schroeder

Frequent Co-Authors

George Tsatsaronis
George Tsatsaronis Technical University of Berlin
Wolfgang Nejdl
Wolfgang Nejdl University of Hannover
Patrick Lambrix
Patrick Lambrix Linköping University
Gerd Wagner
Gerd Wagner Brandenburg University of Technology
Werner Nutt
Werner Nutt Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Luís Moniz Pereira
Luís Moniz Pereira Universidade Nova de Lisboa
François Bry
François Bry Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
David Gilbert
David Gilbert Brunel University London
Rolf Backofen
Rolf Backofen University of Freiburg
Jacques van Helden
Jacques van Helden Aix-Marseille University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the world of Computer Science doesn’t have to be limited to traditional, on-campus programs. Many students today are discovering the flexibility and speed of enrolling in an accelerated cs degree. These programs allow learners to earn their qualifications faster, opening doors to the tech industry more quickly.

Additionally, students interested in areas like sustainability or design can consider a related environmental engineering degree online or an online degree in mechanical engineering. Both fields integrate computer science principles and offer diverse career options ranging from renewable energy to advanced manufacturing.

For those leaning toward the fundamental sciences, pursuing an online physics degree can provide a solid technical background suitable for data analysis, research, or engineering roles. No matter which pathway you choose, online degrees offer increased flexibility and affordability, allowing you to balance your education with personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Schroeder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles