World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
7114
World Ranking
8035
National Ranking
130

Avigdor Gal publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Avigdor Gal sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 272 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Avigdor Gal D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Avigdor Gal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Avigdor Gal is affiliated with the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in Israel and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several specialized subfields. Their research covers areas including Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Networks and Communications, and Information Systems.

The scientist's work primarily revolves around key topics such as Data Quality and Management, Business Process Modeling and Analysis, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Advanced Database Systems and Queries, Data Management and Algorithms, Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services, and Big Data and Business Intelligence.

Gal has frequently published in prestigious venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
  • Journal of Data and Information Quality
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Among the recent papers associated with Gal are:

  • The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die, 2023, Computers in Industry
  • AI-augmented Business Process Management Systems: A Research Manifesto, 2023, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
  • Recommendations for enhancing the usability and understandability of process mining in healthcare, 2020, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Knowledge-Driven Data Ecosystems Toward Data Transparency, 2021, Journal of Data and Information Quality
  • ADnEV, 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Gal frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Roee Shraga, Izack Cohen, Marco Montali, Bar Genossar, and Diego Calvanese. The number of their coauthored works varies, with the most frequent collaborator being Roee Shraga.

Best Publications

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil Van Der Aalst;Jan Vom Brocke

  • On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE

    Unknown

  • The Internet of Things Meets Business Process Management: A Manifesto

    Christian Janiesch;Agnes Koschmider;Massimo Mecella;Barbara Weber

  • Comparative analysis of approximate blocking techniques for entity resolution

    George Papadakis;Jonathan Svirsky;Avigdor Gal;Themis Palpanas

  • A framework for modeling and evaluating automatic semantic reconciliation

    Avigdor Gal;Ateret Anaby-Tavor;Alberto Trombetta;Danilo Montesi

  • The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die

    Unknown

  • Queue mining for delay prediction in multi-class service processes

    Arik Senderovich;Matthias Weidlich;Avigdor Gal;Avishai Mandelbaum

  • Managing uncertainty in schema matching with top-k schema mappings

    Avigdor Gal

  • Traveling time prediction in scheduled transportation with journey segments

    Avigdor Gal;Avishai Mandelbaum;François Schnitzler;Arik Senderovich

  • Complex event processing over uncertain data

    Segev Wasserkrug;Avigdor Gal;Opher Etzion;Yulia Turchin

  • Heterogeneous Stream Processing and Crowdsourcing for Urban Traffic Management

    Alexander Artikis;Matthias Weidlich;Francois Schnitzler;Ioannis Boutsis

  • Queue Mining – Predicting Delays in Service Processes

    Arik Senderovich;Matthias Weidlich;Avigdor Gal;Avishai Mandelbaum

  • Automatic ontology matching using application semantics

    Avigdor Gal;Giovanni Modica;Hasan Jamil;Ami Eyal

  • The Use of Machine-Generated Ontologies in Dynamic Information Seeking

    Giovanni A. Modica;Avigdor Gal;Avigdor Gal;Hasan M. Jamil

  • Goal recognition design

    Sarah Keren;Avigdor Gal;Erez Karpas

  • Uncertain Schema Matching

    Avigdor Gal

  • Efficient Processing of Uncertain Events in Rule-Based Systems

    S. Wasserkrug;A. Gal;O. Etzion;Y. Turchin

  • Why is schema matching tough and what can we do about it

    Avigdor Gal

  • The Process Model Matching Contest 2015

    Gonçalo Antunes;Marzieh Bakhshandeh;José Luis Borbinha;Joao Cardoso

  • A semantic approach to approximate service retrieval

    Eran Toch;Avigdor Gal;Iris Reinhartz-Berger;Dov Dori

  • OntoBuilder: fully automatic extraction and consolidation of ontologies from Web sources

    A. Gal;G. Modica;H. Jamil

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil van der Aalst;Jan vom Brocke

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Weidlich
Matthias Weidlich Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Avishai Mandelbaum
Avishai Mandelbaum Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Dov Dori
Dov Dori Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Karl Aberer
Karl Aberer École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Vana Kalogeraki
Vana Kalogeraki Athens University of Economics and Business
Dimitrios Gunopulos
Dimitrios Gunopulos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Mathias Weske
Mathias Weske Hasso Plattner Institute
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Manfred Reichert
Manfred Reichert University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in computer science or related technical fields, online education offers flexible and affordable options. A computer science degree online can help you break into the tech industry or advance in your current IT role without putting your career or location on hold.

Related disciplines, such as environmental and mechanical engineering, also offer reputable online programs. For those interested in sustainability and technology, an environmental engineer degree online opens doors to careers addressing global environmental challenges. Likewise, if you’re exploring advanced technical roles, the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering programs provide rigorous education at a fraction of on-campus costs.

Science enthusiasts can consider the growing field of online physics education. An online physics degree can lead to opportunities in research, engineering, and education. No matter which pathway you choose, online degrees deliver flexibility, affordability, and pathways to high-demand careers in technology and science.

Best Scientists Citing Avigdor Gal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles