World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wendy M. Rodgers

Wendy M. Rodgers

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
10507
World Ranking
4996
National Ranking
333

Wendy M. Rodgers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wendy M. Rodgers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Wendy M. Rodgers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wendy M. Rodgers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wendy M. Rodgers is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada. Their research spans multiple studies primarily focused on sports medicine, psychology, and behavioral health.

Rodgers has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • The Relationship of Self-efficacy and Explicit and Implicit Associations on the Intention-Behavior Gap, 2020, Journal of Physical Activity and Health
  • Not your average sport parents: How sport scholars make decisions about their own children's sport involvement, 2022, Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Participation profiles of current masters swimmers and their (lack of) retrospective associations with youth experiences, 2020, Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • The relative importance of training volume and coach autonomy support for preventing youth swimming attrition, 2020, Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)
  • Treating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): The Impact of Historical Environmental Context on Healthcare Perceptions and Decision-Making in Charleston, South Carolina, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

The scientist has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, among them:

  • Tara-Leigh McHugh
  • Heather Larson
  • Bradley W. Young
  • Tanya R. Berry
  • Alison Divine

Rodgers has published in various venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health
  • Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Their research fields include medicine and psychology, with a focus on several subfields such as:

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • General Health Professions

Key topics in Rodgers' work center on:

  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Sports Performance and Training

Best Publications

  • The Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale

    Philip M. Wilson;W. Todd Rogers;Wendy M. Rodgers;T. Cameron Wild

  • “It's Who I Am … Really!’ The Importance of Integrated Regulation in Exercise Contexts1

    Philip M. Wilson;Wendy M. Rodgers;Christina C. Loitz;Giulia Scime

  • The relationship between perceived autonomy support, exercise regulations and behavioral intentions in women

    P.M. Wilson;W.M. Rodgers

  • The Use of Imagery by Athletes in Selected Sports

    Craig R. Hall;Wendy M. Rodgers;Kathryn A. Barr

  • Catastrophizing, depression and expectancies for pain and emotional distress

    Michael J.L. Sullivan;Wendy M. Rodgers;Irving Kirsch

  • The relationship between psychological needs, self-determined motivation, exercise attitudes, and physical fitness.

    Philip M. Wilson;WendY M. Rodgers;Chris M. Blanchard;Joanne Gessell

  • Relationships Between Exercise Regulations and Motivational Consequences in University Students

    Philip M. Wilson;Wendy M. Rodgers;Shawn N. Fraser;Terra C. Murray

  • The effect of an imagery training program on imagery ability, imagery use, and figure skating performance

    Wendy Rodgers;Craig Hall;Eric Buckolz

  • Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: An examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK)

    Shannon D Scott;Ronald C Plotnikoff;Nandini Karunamuni;Raphaël Bize

  • Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire

    Philip M. Wilson;Wendy M. Rodgers;Shawn N. Fraser

  • Exploring the Influence of a Social Ecological Model on School-Based Physical Activity:

    Jessie-Lee D. Langille;Wendy M. Rodgers

  • The relationship between commitment and exercise behavior.

    Philip M. Wilson;Wendy M. Rodgers;Paul J. Carpenter;Craig Hall

  • Task and Scheduling Self-efficacy as Predictors of Exercise Behavior

    Wendy M. Rodgers;Craig R. Hall;Chris M. Blanchard;Edward McAuley

  • Evidence for a Multidimensional Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale.

    Wendy M. Rodgers;P.M. Wilson;C.R. Hall;S.N. Fraser

  • Using Telehealth technology to deliver pulmonary rehabilitation to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Michael K Stickland;Tina Jourdain;Eric Yl Wong;Wendy M Rodgers

  • The relationship between exercise motives and physical self-esteem in female exercise participants: An application of Self-Determination Theory

    Philip M. Wilson;Wendy M. Rodgers

  • An experimental investigation of the relation between catastrophizing and activity intolerance.

    Michael J.L Sullivan;Wendy M Rodgers;Philip M Wilson;Gordon J Bell

  • Distinguishing among perceived control, perceived difficulty, and self‐efficacy as determinants of intentions and behaviours

    W M Rodgers;Mark Conner;T C Murray

  • Catastrophizing and pain perception in sport participants

    Michael J. L. Sullivan;Dean A. Tripp;Wendy M. Rodgers;William Stanish

  • Exercise imagery: Its nature and measurement

    Heather A. Hausenblas;Craig R. Hall;Wendy M. Rodgers;Krista J. Munroe

  • Task, Coping, and Scheduling Self-Efficacy in Relation to Frequency of Physical Activity1

    Wendy M. Rodgers;Michael J. L. Sullivan

Frequent Co-Authors

Tanya R. Berry
Tanya R. Berry University of Alberta
Craig R. Hall
Craig R. Hall University of Western Ontario
Philip M. Wilson
Philip M. Wilson Brock University
Kerry S. Courneya
Kerry S. Courneya University of Alberta
Chris M. Blanchard
Chris M. Blanchard Dalhousie University
John C. Spence
John C. Spence University of Alberta
Kerry R. McGannon
Kerry R. McGannon Laurentian University
Camilla J. Knight
Camilla J. Knight Swansea University
Ronald C. Plotnikoff
Ronald C. Plotnikoff University of Newcastle Australia
Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths, both online and on-campus. One of the most popular options is working as a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), where professionals help individuals, couples, and families navigate challenges and improve relationships.

Requirements and pathways to become an MFT can differ by location. For example, learning how to become a marriage and family therapist in Atlanta may involve different licensing steps than in other cities. Each region, such as how to become an mft in Aurora, has specific educational prerequisites, supervised clinical hours, and state exams.

Aspiring therapists should also consider local guidelines, as outlined in resources like how to become an mft in Austin and how to become an mft in Bakersfield. Additionally, online degrees can offer flexibility, enabling students to balance studies with other commitments while still meeting the requirements for professional practice. Exploring these career pathways ensures you are well-prepared for a fulfilling career in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Wendy M. Rodgers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles