World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kathleen A. Martin Ginis

Kathleen A. Martin Ginis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 73 1957 1770 110 98 334 21036

Kathleen A. Martin Ginis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathleen A. Martin Ginis between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathleen A. Martin Ginis published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 18.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2019. 32 of the 432 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2019. 2003: 5 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 36 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 17 publications
2003 2025

432 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathleen A. Martin Ginis: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 5
2004 12
2005 7
2006 13
2007 16
2008 8
2009 8
2010 15
2011 16
2012 24
2013 22
2014 21
2015 14
2016 22
2017 36
2018 22
2019 37
2020 19
2021 36
2022 21
2023 26
2024 15
2025 17
Total 432
Download as CSV

Kathleen A. Martin Ginis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen A. Martin Ginis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 334 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 334
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathleen A. Martin Ginis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen A. Martin Ginis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 73
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kathleen A. Martin Ginis is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions across several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Physiology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Policy Implementation Science

Kathleen A. Martin Ginis has published extensively in journals such as:

  • Spinal Cord
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Disabilities
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Some of their recent notable publications include:

  • "Participation of people living with disabilities in physical activity: a global perspective" (2021), published in The Lancet
  • "Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership" (2020), published in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • "Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Trends, Outcomes, and Predictions From a 15-Year Perspective of a Single Neurocritical Care Unit" (2020), published in Neurosurgery
  • "Examining the relationship between parent physical activity support behaviour and physical activity among children and youth with autism spectrum disorder" (2020), published in Autism
  • "Does it matter what your reasons are when deciding to disclose (or not disclose) a disability at work? The association of workers' approach and avoidance goals with perceived positive and negative workplace outcomes" (2021), published in Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

The scientist frequently collaborates with co-authors such as:

  • Kelly P. Arbour-Nicitopoulos
  • Femke Hoekstra
  • K. Jasmin
  • Heather L. Gainforth
  • Christopher B. McBride

Best Publications

  • Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN) - terminology consensus project process and outcome

    Mark S. Tremblay;Salomé Aubert;Joel D. Barnes;Travis J. Saunders

  • Effects of Exercise Training on Fitness, Mobility, Fatigue, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review to Inform Guideline Development

    Amy E. Latimer-Cheung;Lara A. Pilutti;Lara A. Pilutti;Audrey L. Hicks;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis

  • A systematic review of review articles addressing factors related to physical activity participation among children and adults with physical disabilities

    Kathleen A Martin Ginis;Jasmin K Ma;Amy E Latimer-Cheung;James H Rimmer

  • Participation of people living with disabilities in physical activity: a global perspective.

    Kathleen A Martin Ginis;Hidde P van der Ploeg;Hidde P van der Ploeg;Charlie Foster;Byron Lai

  • Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury: An update and a new guideline

    Kathleen A Martin Ginis;Jan W van der Scheer;Amy E Latimer-Cheung;Andy Barrow

  • The Psychology of Exercise : Integrating Theory and Practice

    Curt L. Lox;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis;Steven J. Petruzzello

  • Development of Evidence-Informed Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults With Multiple Sclerosis

    Amy E. Latimer-Cheung;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis;Audrey L. Hicks;Robert W. Motl

  • Behaviour change techniques targeting both diet and physical activity in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Kevin A. Cradock;Gearóid ÓLaighin;Francis M. Finucane;Heather L. Gainforth

  • Leisure time physical activity in a population-based sample of people with spinal cord injury part I: demographic and injury-related correlates.

    Kathleen A. Martin Ginis;Amy E. Latimer;Kelly P. Arbour-Nicitopoulos;Andrea C. Buchholz

  • Leadership styles, emotion regulation, and burnout.

    Kara A. Arnold;Catherine E. Connelly;Megan M. Walsh;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis

  • Peer-delivered physical activity interventions: an overlooked opportunity for physical activity promotion.

    Kathleen A Martin Ginis;Claudio R Nigg;Alan L Smith

  • Behavior Change and the Freshman 15: Tracking Physical Activity and Dietary Patterns in 1st-Year University Women

    Mary Elizabeth Jung;Steven Russell Bray;Kathleen Anne Martin Ginis

  • Effects of exercise on fitness and health of adults with spinal cord injury A systematic review

    Jan W. van der Scheer;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis;David S. Ditor;Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey

  • Effects of self-regulatory strength depletion on muscular performance and EMG activation.

    Steven R. Bray;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis;Audrey L. Hicks;Jennifer Woodgate

  • The efficacy of an implementation intention intervention for promoting physical activity among individuals with spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial.

    Amy E. Latimer;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis;Kelly P. Arbour

  • Music Enhances Performance and Perceived Enjoyment of Sprint Interval Exercise

    Matthew J. Stork;Matthew Y. W. Kwan;Martin J. Gibala;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis

  • Greater daily leisure time physical activity is associated with lower chronic disease risk in adults with spinal cord injury.

    Andrea C. BuchholzA.C. Buchholz;Kathleen A. Martin GinisK.A. Martin Ginis;Steven R. BrayS.R. Bray;B. Catharine CravenB.C. Craven

  • Using exercise to enhance subjective well-being among people with spinal cord injury: The mediating influences of stress and pain.

    Kathleen A. Martin Ginis;Amy E. Latimer;Kyle McKechnie;David S. Ditor

  • Development and evaluation of an activity measure for people with spinal cord injury.

    Kathleen A Martin Ginis;Amy E Latimer;Audrey L Hicks;B Catharine Craven

  • Effects of exposure to muscular and hypermuscular media images on young men's muscularity dissatisfaction and body dissatisfaction.

    Kelly P. Arbour;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis

Frequent Co-Authors

Amy E. Latimer-Cheung
Amy E. Latimer-Cheung Queen's University
Steven R. Bray
Steven R. Bray McMaster University
Steven J. Petruzzello
Steven J. Petruzzello University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Brett Smith
Brett Smith Durham University
Andrei V. Krassioukov
Andrei V. Krassioukov University of British Columbia
Lawrence R Brawley
Lawrence R Brawley University of Saskatchewan
Harry Prapavessis
Harry Prapavessis University of Western Ontario
Guy Faulkner
Guy Faulkner University of British Columbia
John C. Spence
John C. Spence University of Alberta
Robert W. Motl
Robert W. Motl University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a field of study in the USA opens diverse opportunities for online degrees and flexible career pathways. Many universities now offer online psychology programs, allowing students to balance education with work or personal commitments. As demand continues to rise, it’s crucial to choose a program that offers both affordability and strong career prospects.

For students interested in specialized regional programs, you can consult rankings such as the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in Hawaii or the best value psychology programs in Jacksonville. These resources help highlight programs that combine excellent academics with value.

Considering factors like cost, faculty expertise, and post-graduation employment can make a measurable difference. Tools such as the most valuable psychology degrees in New Jersey and most valuable psychology programs in New York provide insights into the best options for different regions. Researching these pathways can empower you to make informed decisions for your educational and professional future.

Best Scientists Citing Kathleen A. Martin Ginis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles