World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6469 6023 654 622 137 7464

Jennifer Cumming publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jennifer Cumming between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jennifer Cumming published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2010. 7 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2010. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jennifer Cumming: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 4
2006 7
2007 2
2008 6
2009 7
2010 15
2011 13
2012 14
2013 8
2014 4
2015 6
2016 12
2017 9
2018 6
2019 3
2020 2
2021 6
2022 9
2023 8
2024 11
2025 6
2026 1
Total 169
Download as CSV

Jennifer Cumming publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer Cumming sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 137
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jennifer Cumming D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer Cumming sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jennifer Cumming is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Health Professions, with significant contributions across subfields including General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Safety Research, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's work explores diverse themes centered around youth and community well-being. Key research topics include:

  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Community Health and Development
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Physical Activity and Health

Cumming has contributed to journals and venues with repeated publications, such as:

  • BMJ Open
  • Evaluation and Program Planning
  • Preprints.org
  • Journal of Youth Development
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Among their recent papers are:

  • Neurobiological evidence of longer-term physical activity interventions on mental health outcomes and cognition in young people: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Promoting Athlete Mental Health: The Role of Emotion Regulation (2021, Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology)
  • Process Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programmes for Disadvantaged Young People: A Systematic Review (2022, Journal of Youth Development)
  • Improving outcomes in young people experiencing homelessness with My Strengths Training for Life™ (MST4Life™): A qualitative realist evaluation (2020, Children and Youth Services Review)
  • Promoting Personal Growth in Young People Experiencing Homelessness Through an Outdoors-Based Program (2021, Journal of Youth Development)

Frequent collaborators in Cumming's research include Mary L. Quinton, Grace Tidmarsh, Benjamin J. Parry, Janice L. Thompson, and Mark J.G. Holland.

Best Publications

  • Further Validation and Development of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire

    Sarah E Williams;Jennifer Cumming;Nikos Ntoumanis;Sanna M Nordin-Bates

  • Deliberate imagery practice: the development of imagery skills in competitive athletes.

    Jennifer Cumming;Craig Hall

  • Introducing the revised applied model of deliberate imagery use for sport, dance, exercise, and rehabilitation

    Jennifer Cumming;Sarah E. Williams

  • Motivational Profiles and Psychological Skills Use within Elite Youth Sport

    Chris Harwood;Jennifer Cumming;David Fletcher

  • The Role of Imagery in Performance

    Jennifer Cumming;Sarah E. Williams

  • Imagery in Sport, Exercise and Dance

    Shane Murphy;Sanna M Nordin;Jennifer Cumming

  • Measuring Athlete Imagery Ability: The Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire

    Sarah E. Williams;Jennifer Cumming

  • The Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Imagery Training: A Matter of Perspective

    Jennifer L. Cumming;Diane M. Ste-Marie

  • Professional Dancers Describe Their Imagery: Where, When, What, Why, and How

    Sanna M. Nordin;Jennifer Cumming

  • Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, Stress-Related Appraisals, and Dancers’ Cortisol and Anxiety Responses

    Eleanor Quested;Jos A. Bosch;Victoria E. Burns;Jennifer Cumming

  • The Use of Imagery to Manipulate Challenge and Threat Appraisal States in Athletes

    Sarah E. Williams;Jennifer Cumming;George M. Balanos

  • Athletes’ Use of Imagery in the Off-Season

    Jennifer Cumming;Craig R. Hall

  • Imagery interventions in sport

    Jennifer Cumming;Richard Ramsey

  • Development and validation of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire for Children (MIQ-C)

    Rose Martini;Michael J. Carter;Emma Yoxon;Jennifer Cumming

  • Profiles of perfectionism, body-related concerns, and indicators of psychological health in vocational dance students: An investigation of the 2 × 2 model of perfectionism

    Jennifer Cumming;Joan L. Duda

  • Examining the Direction of Imagery and Self-Talk on Dart-Throwing Performance and Self Efficacy

    Jennifer Cumming;Sanna M. Nordin;Robin Horton;Scott Reynolds

  • Layered stimulus response training improves motor imagery ability and movement execution.

    Sarah E Williams;Sam J Cooley;Jennifer Cumming

  • Self-reported psychological states and physiological responses to different types of motivational general imagery.

    Jennifer Cumming;Tom Olphin;Michelle Law

  • The role of outdoor adventure education in facilitating groupwork in higher education

    Sam J. Cooley;Victoria E. Burns;Jennifer Cumming

  • Are we having fun yet? Testing the effects of imagery use on the affective and enjoyment responses to acute moderate exercise

    Damian M. Stanley;Jennifer Cumming

  • Where, when, and how: a quantitative account of dance imagery.

    Sanna M. Nordin;Jennifer Cumming

Frequent Co-Authors

Joan L. Duda
Joan L. Duda University of Birmingham
Craig R. Hall
Craig R. Hall University of Western Ontario
Nikos Ntoumanis
Nikos Ntoumanis University of Southern Denmark
Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani
Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani University of Southern Denmark
Chris G. Harwood
Chris G. Harwood Loughborough University
Rob Gray
Rob Gray University of East Anglia
Jos A. Bosch
Jos A. Bosch University of Amsterdam
Andrew P. Hill
Andrew P. Hill York St John University
Martyn Standage
Martyn Standage University of Bath
Paul S. Holmes
Paul S. Holmes Manchester Metropolitan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online provides flexible options for students across the United States. Many accredited universities offer programs designed to fit your schedule, whether you’re looking for undergraduate or graduate study. As online education continues to grow, prospective students can choose from a wide variety of specialized and accessible options.

For those located in California, you may want to explore the easiest online psychology master's in California, which highlights programs that balance academic rigor with manageable entry requirements. Similarly, students interested in the Mid-Atlantic region can check out the easiest online psychology master's degrees in Pennsylvania, offering a diverse range of career-focused pathways.

If you’re based in the Midwest, reviewing the easiest online psychology degree programs in the Midwest can be a great first step towards identifying programs that match your needs. Additionally, those in Texas can discover flexible options by visiting the easiest online psychology programs in San Antonio.

With a variety of formats and specializations available, online psychology degrees can lead to careers in counseling, research, education, and more. Carefully reviewing regional options can help you find a program that aligns with your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer Cumming

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles