World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
15918
World Ranking
16467
National Ranking
6816

Lukas Chavez publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukas Chavez sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 175 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Lukas Chavez D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukas Chavez sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lukas Chavez is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research expertise spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus also on Medicine. Within these domains, they have contributed notably to Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cancer Research, Oncology, and Epidemiology.

Their scientific output includes numerous publications concentrated on topics such as Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, RNA modifications and cancer, Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research, Protein Degradation and Inhibitors, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, and Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis.

Among their recent published works are:

  • "Reduced chromatin binding of MYC is a key effect of HDAC inhibition in MYC amplified medulloblastoma" (2020, Neuro-Oncology)
  • "The Meningioma Enhancer Landscape Delineates Novel Subgroups and Drives Druggable Dependencies" (2020, Cancer Discovery)
  • "Circular extrachromosomal DNA promotes tumor heterogeneity in high-risk medulloblastoma" (2023, Nature Genetics)
  • "PTEN deficiency leads to proteasome addiction: a novel vulnerability in glioblastoma" (2021, Neuro-Oncology)
  • "3D genome mapping identifies subgroup-specific chromosome conformations and tumor-dependency genes in ependymoma" (2023, Nature Communications)

Chavez frequently collaborates with a core group of researchers, including Owen Chapman, Jill P. Mesirov, Robert J. Wechsler-Reya, Sunita Sridhar, and Shanqing Wang. This network reflects a sustained partnership in advancing cancer biology and genomics understanding.

Their publications are predominantly featured in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, Cancer Research, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cancer Discovery, and Nature Communications.

Best Publications

  • DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours

    David Capper;David Capper;David Capper;David T. W. Jones;Martin Sill;Volker Hovestadt

  • The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers

    Susanne N. Gröbner;Barbara C. Worst;Joachim Weischenfeldt;Joachim Weischenfeldt;Ivo Buchhalter

  • The whole-genome landscape of medulloblastoma subtypes

    Paul A. Northcott;Paul A. Northcott;Ivo Buchhalter;Ivo Buchhalter;A. Sorana Morrissy;Volker Hovestadt

  • DNA methylation-based classification and grading system for meningioma: a multicentre, retrospective analysis

    Felix Sahm;Felix Sahm;Daniel Schrimpf;Damian Stichel;David T.W. Jones

  • Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors Are Comprised of Three Epigenetic Subgroups with Distinct Enhancer Landscapes

    Pascal D. Johann;Pascal D. Johann;Serap Erkek;Marc Zapatka;Kornelius Kerl

  • Modulation of TET2 expression and 5-methylcytosine oxidation by the CXXC domain protein IDAX

    Myunggon Ko;Jungeun An;Hozefa S. Bandukwala;Lukas Chavez

  • Spectrum and prevalence of genetic predisposition in medulloblastoma: a retrospective genetic study and prospective validation in a clinical trial cohort

    Sebastian M. Waszak;Paul A. Northcott;Paul A. Northcott;Ivo Buchhalter;Giles W. Robinson

  • Active medulloblastoma enhancers reveal subgroup-specific cellular origins

    Charles Y. Lin;Charles Y. Lin;Serap Erkek;Yiai Tong;Linlin Yin

  • MEDIPS: genome-wide differential coverage analysis of sequencing data derived from DNA enrichment experiments

    Matthias Lienhard;Christina Grimm;Markus Morkel;Ralf Herwig

  • Large conserved domains of low DNA methylation maintained by Dnmt3a.

    Mira Jeong;Deqiang Sun;Min Luo;Yun Huang

  • Innate-like functions of natural killer T cell subsets result from highly divergent gene programs

    Isaac Engel;Grégory Seumois;Lukas Chavez;Daniela Samaniego-Castruita

  • Distinct roles of the methylcytosine oxidases Tet1 and Tet2 in mouse embryonic stem cells

    Yun Huang;Lukas Chavez;Xing Chang;Xue Wang

  • Dynamic Changes in Chromatin Accessibility Occur in CD8+ T Cells Responding to Viral Infection

    James P. Scott-Browne;Isaac F. López-Moyado;Sara Trifari;Victor Wong

  • Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young (PLNTY): an epileptogenic neoplasm with oligodendroglioma-like components, aberrant CD34 expression, and genetic alterations involving the MAP kinase pathway

    Jason T. Huse;Matija Snuderl;David T. W. Jones;Carole D. Brathwaite

  • Second-generation molecular subgrouping of medulloblastoma: an international meta-analysis of Group 3 and Group 4 subtypes

    Tanvi Sharma;Tanvi Sharma;Edward C. Schwalbe;Edward C. Schwalbe;Daniel Williamson;Martin Sill

  • Molecular heterogeneity and CXorf67 alterations in posterior fossa group A (PFA) ependymomas.

    Kristian W. Pajtler;Kristian W. Pajtler;Ji Wen;Martin Sill;Tong Lin

  • Targeting Glioblastoma Stem Cells through Disruption of the Circadian Clock

    Zhen Dong;Guoxin Zhang;Meng Qu;Ryan C. Gimple;Ryan C. Gimple

  • Immunohistochemical analysis of H3K27me3 demonstrates global reduction in group-A childhood posterior fossa ependymoma and is a powerful predictor of outcome.

    Pooja Panwalkar;Jonathan Clark;Vijay Ramaswamy;Debra Hawes

  • Computational analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation during the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells along the endodermal lineage

    Lukas Chavez;Justyna Jozefczuk;Christina Grimm;Jörn Dietrich

  • Therapeutic targeting of ependymoma as informed by oncogenic enhancer profiling

    Stephen C. Mack;Kristian W. Pajtler;Kristian W. Pajtler;Lukas Chavez;Lukas Chavez;Konstantin Okonechnikov

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan M. Pfister
Stefan M. Pfister German Cancer Research Center
Marcel Kool
Marcel Kool German Cancer Research Center
David Capper
David Capper Charité - University Medicine Berlin
David T. W. Jones
David T. W. Jones German Cancer Research Center
Paul A. Northcott
Paul A. Northcott St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Andrey Korshunov
Andrey Korshunov German Cancer Research Center
Anjana Rao
Anjana Rao La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
Peter Lichter
Peter Lichter German Cancer Research Center
Michael D. Taylor
Michael D. Taylor University of Toronto
Andreas von Deimling
Andreas von Deimling Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of online degrees and healthcare career pathways in the USA. For those interested in wellness and food science, exploring the fastest nutrition degree online can help you earn a qualification quickly and enter the workforce sooner.

Another popular path is healthcare management. Affordable options exist, such as choosing the cheapest online mba in healthcare management, making it easier to advance into leadership roles without taking on significant student debt.

Biology and Biochemistry backgrounds are also useful in health information fields. Becoming a certified coding specialist (ccs) can lead to strong job prospects, and it’s important to compare certifications for the best fit.

Many students also want to know how much does a medical coder make before committing to this path. Understanding salary expectations helps you choose the right track as you consider your education and career options.

Best Scientists Citing Lukas Chavez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles