World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Paul S. Earle publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul S. Earle sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Paul S. Earle D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul S. Earle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul S. Earle is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States and specializes in Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular focus on Geophysics. Their research interests also encompass Artificial Intelligence, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics.

Their work addresses several key scientific topics, including earthquake and tectonic studies, earthquake detection and analysis, seismic waves and analysis, high-pressure geophysics and materials, seismology and earthquake studies, geological and geochemical analysis, as well as geological and geophysical studies worldwide.

Paul S. Earle has contributed to multiple papers in several prominent venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • The Seismic Record
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Science Advances
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Their recent published papers exemplify their research focus:

  • Rapid Characterization of the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Earthquake Sequence (2023, The Seismic Record)
  • Leveraging Deep Learning in Global 24/7 Real-Time Earthquake Monitoring at the National Earthquake Information Center (2020, Seismological Research Letters)
  • Rapid Source Characterization of the 2023 Mw 6.8 Al Haouz, Morocco, Earthquake (2023, The Seismic Record)
  • A Big Problem for Small Earthquakes: Benchmarking Routine Magnitudes and Conversion Relationships with Coda Envelope-Derived Mw in Southern Kansas and Northern Oklahoma (2021, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America)
  • High-Precision Characterization of Seismicity from the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Volcanic Eruption (2022, Seismological Research Letters)

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Earle's research, with frequent coauthors including William L. Yeck, D. R. Shelly, H. Benz, Dara E. Goldberg, and William D. Barnhart.

Best Publications

  • Twitter earthquake detection: earthquake monitoring in a social world

    Paul S. Earle;Daniel C. Bowden;Michelle R. Guy

  • Characterization of global seismograms using an automatic-picking algorithm

    Paul S. Earle;Peter M. Shearer

  • Coping with earthquakes induced by fluid injection

    Arthur F. McGarr;Barbara Bekins;Nina Burkardt;James W. Dewey

  • OMG Earthquake! Can Twitter Improve Earthquake Response?

    Paul Earle;Michelle Guy;Richard Buckmaster;Chris Ostrum

  • 2018 One‐Year Seismic Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes

    Mark D. Petersen;Charles S. Mueller;Morgan P. Moschetti;Susan M. Hoover

  • Continuing megathrust earthquake potential in Chile after the 2014 Iquique earthquake

    Gavin P. Hayes;Matthew W. Herman;William D. Barnhart;Kevin P. Furlong

  • Seismic evidence for small-scale heterogeneity throughout the Earth's mantle

    Michael A. H. Hedlin;Peter M. Shearer;Paul S. Earle

  • Oklahoma experiences largest earthquake during ongoing regional wastewater injection hazard mitigation efforts

    William L. Yeck;Gavin P. Hayes;Daniel E. McNamara;Justin L. Rubinstein

  • Fine-scale heterogeneity in the Earth's inner core

    John E. Vidale;Paul S. Earle

  • Far-field pressurization likely caused one of the largest injection induced earthquakes by reactivating a large preexisting basement fault structure

    William L. Yeck;Matthew Weingarten;Harley M. Benz;Daniel E. McNamara

  • Earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanisms in central Oklahoma reveal a complex system of reactivated subsurface strike‐slip faulting

    Daniel E. McNamara;Harley M. Benz;Robert B. Herrmann;Eric A. Bergman

  • Slow differential rotation of the Earth's inner core indicated by temporal changes in scattering

    John E. Vidale;Doug A. Dodge;Paul S. Earle

  • The global short-period wavefield modelled with a Monte Carlo seismic phonon method

    Peter M. Shearer;Paul S. Earle

  • Rapid Characterization of the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Earthquake Sequence

    Unknown

  • Integration and dissemination of citizen reported and seismically derived earthquake information via social network technologies

    Michelle Guy;Paul Earle;Chris Ostrum;Kenny Gruchalla

  • Strong directivity of ocean‐generated seismic noise

    Vera Schulte-Pelkum;Paul S. Earle;Frank L. Vernon

  • PAGER-CAT: A Composite Earthquake Catalog for Calibrating Global Fatality Models

    Trevor I. Allen;Kristin D. Marano;Paul S. Earle;David J. Wald

  • Rapid Characterization of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake Sequence and Its Seismotectonic Context

    Gavin P. Hayes;Richard W. Briggs;William D. Barnhart;William L. Yeck

  • Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER): A System for Rapidly Determining the Impact of Earthquakes Worldwide

    Paul S. Earle;David J. Wald;Kishor S. Jaiswal;Trevor I. Allen

  • Earthquake Casualty Models Within the USGS Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) System

    Kishor Jaiswal;David J. Wald;Paul S. Earle;Keith A. Porter

  • Observations of PKKP Precursors Used to Estimate Small-Scale Topography on the Core-Mantle Boundary

    Paul S. Earle;Peter M. Shearer

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Wald
David J. Wald United States Geological Survey
Harley M. Benz
Harley M. Benz United States Geological Survey
Gavin P. Hayes
Gavin P. Hayes United States Geological Survey
Peter M. Shearer
Peter M. Shearer University of California, San Diego
Daniel E. McNamara
Daniel E. McNamara United States Geological Survey
John E. Vidale
John E. Vidale University of Southern California
Eric A. Bergman
Eric A. Bergman University of Colorado Boulder
Richard W. Briggs
Richard W. Briggs United States Geological Survey
Robert B. Herrmann
Robert B. Herrmann Saint Louis University
Justin L. Rubinstein
Justin L. Rubinstein United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science often opens doors to diverse educational opportunities beyond traditional study. For seniors seeking flexible learning options, one year degree programs for seniors provide accelerated pathways to gain new skills and knowledge without a multi-year commitment. These programs can complement Earth Science studies by offering focused, practical education.

For those interested in the intersection of environmental data and information management, pursuing an mlis ala accredited programs can be a valuable step. Library and Information Science professionals play a crucial role in organizing scientific research and data, supporting fields like Earth Science through streamlined access to vital resources.

Similarly, earning a degree in library science equips learners with expertise in managing collections and digital archives, skills increasingly important for Earth Science researchers handling vast amounts of data. This pathway enables careers that blend scientific knowledge with information stewardship.

Beyond traditional sciences, fields such as digital photography offer complementary skills useful in environmental documentation and research. Exploring the cheapest online photography degree programs can be an affordable way to develop technical proficiency in visual documentation, an essential tool for many Earth Science professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Paul S. Earle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles