His primary areas of study are Seismology, Induced seismicity, Fault, Seismic wave and Geophysics. The Seismology study combines topics in areas such as Azimuth and Shear wave splitting. His Induced seismicity investigation overlaps with other areas such as Fluid injection, Injury control, Oil and gas production and Poison control.
His work carried out in the field of Fault brings together such families of science as Hypocenter and Earthquake hazard. His research in Seismic wave intersects with topics in Seismic anisotropy, Structure of the Earth, Inner core and Mineralogy. His work on Core–mantle boundary, Mantle and Transition zone as part of general Geophysics study is frequently connected to Layering, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
Paul S. Earle spends much of his time researching Seismology, Mantle, Geophysics, Geological survey and Pager. While working in this field, Paul S. Earle studies both Seismology and Hazard. His Mantle research integrates issues from Seismogram, Seismic array and Crust.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Scale and Mineralogy. Paul S. Earle has researched Geological survey in several fields, including Earthquake casualty estimation and Magnitude. His work on Remotely triggered earthquakes as part of general Fault research is often related to Moment tensor and Basement, thus linking different fields of science.
His primary areas of investigation include Seismology, Induced seismicity, Fault, Hypocenter and Information center. Paul S. Earle conducts interdisciplinary study in the fields of Seismology and Hazard through his works. The concepts of his Induced seismicity study are interwoven with issues in Subduction and Interplate earthquake.
His Hypocenter study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Gravitational wave, Detector and Geodesy. His study in Remotely triggered earthquakes is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Geological survey, Seismotectonics, Urban seismic risk and Natural disaster. Paul S. Earle interconnects Geodynamics, Intraplate earthquake and Earthquake casualty estimation in the investigation of issues within Aftershock.
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Seismology, Induced seismicity, Fault, Remotely triggered earthquakes and Moment tensor. There are a combination of areas like Basement and Fluid injection integrated together with his Seismology study. Earthquake hazard, Hazard mitigation, Pawnee and Hypocenter are fields of study that overlap with his Basement research.
His Fluid injection research covers fields of interest such as Accident prevention, Waste disposal, Geothermal gradient, Injury control and Oil and gas production. He undertakes multidisciplinary studies into Induced seismicity and Poison control in his work. The concepts of his Remotely triggered earthquakes study are interwoven with issues in Natural disaster, Aftershock, Seismotectonics, Geological survey and Urban seismic risk.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Twitter earthquake detection: earthquake monitoring in a social world
Paul S. Earle;Daniel C. Bowden;Michelle R. Guy.
Annals of Geophysics (2012)
Characterization of global seismograms using an automatic-picking algorithm
Paul S. Earle;Peter M. Shearer.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1994)
Coping with earthquakes induced by fluid injection
Arthur F. McGarr;Barbara Bekins;Nina Burkardt;James W. Dewey.
Science (2015)
OMG Earthquake! Can Twitter Improve Earthquake Response?
Paul Earle;Michelle Guy;Richard Buckmaster;Chris Ostrum.
Seismological Research Letters (2010)
2018 One‐Year Seismic Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes
Mark D. Petersen;Charles S. Mueller;Morgan P. Moschetti;Susan M. Hoover.
Seismological Research Letters (2018)
Seismic evidence for small-scale heterogeneity throughout the Earth's mantle
Michael A. H. Hedlin;Peter M. Shearer;Paul S. Earle.
Nature (1997)
Continuing megathrust earthquake potential in Chile after the 2014 Iquique earthquake
Gavin P. Hayes;Matthew W. Herman;William D. Barnhart;Kevin P. Furlong.
Nature (2014)
Fine-scale heterogeneity in the Earth's inner core
John E. Vidale;Paul S. Earle.
Nature (2000)
Oklahoma experiences largest earthquake during ongoing regional wastewater injection hazard mitigation efforts
William L. Yeck;Gavin P. Hayes;Daniel E. McNamara;Justin L. Rubinstein.
Geophysical Research Letters (2017)
Earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanisms in central Oklahoma reveal a complex system of reactivated subsurface strike‐slip faulting
Daniel E. McNamara;Harley M. Benz;Robert B. Herrmann;Eric A. Bergman.
Geophysical Research Letters (2015)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
United States Geological Survey
United States Geological Survey
University of California, San Diego
United States Geological Survey
University of Colorado Boulder
University of Southern California
Saint Louis University
United States Geological Survey
University of California, San Diego
United States Geological Survey
King's College London
Google (United States)
University of Kashan
South Dakota State University
Cornell University
Osaka Metropolitan University
University of Freiburg
University of Cambridge
University of Copenhagen
University of Debrecen
Amgen (United States)
KU Leuven
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
University of Tokyo
RIKEN
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor