World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7949 7418 37 36 125 6399

Stefan Duschek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stefan Duschek between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stefan Duschek published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2018. 14 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2018. 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 8 publications
2002 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stefan Duschek: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 3
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 7
2008 5
2009 13
2010 3
2011 5
2012 5
2013 8
2014 9
2015 14
2016 9
2017 6
2018 15
2019 5
2020 8
2021 9
2022 7
2023 6
2024 6
2025 8
Total 158
Download as CSV

Stefan Duschek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Duschek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 125
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Stefan Duschek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Duschek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stefan Duschek is affiliated with UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology in Austria. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of medicine and neuroscience, with additional work in psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, pharmacology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist has contributed significantly to topics such as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research, heart rate variability and autonomic control, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, neural and behavioral psychology studies, pain management and placebo effects, reproductive health and technologies, and assisted reproductive technology and twin pregnancy.

Recent research publications include:

  • Depression and trait-anxiety mediate the influence of clinical pain on health-related quality of life in fibromyalgia, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Pain catastrophizing mediates the negative influence of pain and trait-anxiety on health-related quality of life in fibromyalgia, 2020, Quality of Life Research
  • Reliability, Factor Structure and Predictive Validity of the Widespread Pain Index and Symptom Severity Scales of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Criteria of Fibromyalgia, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Attentional function in fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Features of autonomic cardiovascular control during cognition in major depressive disorder, 2020, Psychophysiology

Frequent co-authors include Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso, Casandra I. Montoro, Carmen M. Galvez-Sánchez, Angela Bair, and Pablo de la Coba.

The scientist's work is often published in the following venues:

  • Psychophysiology
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Biological Psychology

Stefan Duschek's scholarly contributions span 69 publications related to medicine and 20 related to neuroscience. Subfields of note within their research portfolio involve psychiatry and mental health (20 publications), cognitive neuroscience (17), cardiology and cardiovascular medicine (16), pharmacology (13), and experimental and cognitive psychology (6).

The topics addressed in their research emphasize fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome (32 publications), heart rate variability and autonomic control (28), musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (26), as well as neural and behavioral psychology studies (12). Their investigations also encompass pain management and placebo effects (10), reproductive health and technologies (8), and assisted reproductive technology and twin pregnancy (8).

Best Publications

  • The utility of low frequency heart rate variability as an index of sympathetic cardiac tone: A review with emphasis on a reanalysis of previous studies

    Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso;Wolf Langewitz;Lambertus J. M. Mulder;Arie Van Roon

  • Psychological impact of fibromyalgia: current perspectives.

    Carmen M Galvez-Sánchez;Stefan Duschek;Gustavo A Reyes del Paso

  • Relationships between features of autonomic cardiovascular control and cognitive performance.

    Stefan Duschek;Magdalena Muckenthaler;Natalie Werner;Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso

  • Enhanced cardiac perception is associated with benefits in decision-making.

    Natalie S. Werner;Katharina Jung;Stefan Duschek;Rainer Schandry

  • Autonomic cardiovascular control and responses to experimental pain stimulation in fibromyalgia syndrome

    Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso;Sergio Garrido;Ángeles Pulgar;Stefan Duschek

  • Functional transcranial Doppler sonography as a tool in psychophysiological research

    Stefan Duschek;Rainer Schandry

  • Reduced brain perfusion and cognitive performance due to constitutional hypotension

    Stefan Duschek;Rainer Schandry

  • Aberrances in autonomic cardiovascular regulation in fibromyalgia syndrome and their relevance for clinical pain reports.

    Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso;Sergio Garrido;Ángeles Pulgar;María Martín-Vázquez

  • Cognitive Impairments in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Associations With Positive and Negative Affect, Alexithymia, Pain Catastrophizing and Self-Esteem

    Carmen M. Galvez-Sánchez;Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso;Stefan Duschek

  • On the relationship between interoceptive awareness and the attentional processing of visual stimuli.

    Ellen Matthias;Rainer Schandry;Stefan Duschek;Olga Pollatos

  • The behavioral impact of baroreflex function: a review.

    Stefan Duschek;Natalie S. Werner;Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso

  • Relationships between affective states and decision-making.

    Natalie S. Werner;Stefan Duschek;Rainer Schandry

  • Cognitive impairment in fibromyalgia syndrome: the impact of cardiovascular regulation, pain, emotional disorders and medication.

    G.A. Reyes del Paso;Á. Pulgar;S. Duschek;S. Garrido

  • Cognitive performance and cerebral blood flow in essential hypotension

    Stefan Duschek;Rainer Schandry

  • Depression and trait-anxiety mediate the influence of clinical pain on health-related quality of life in fibromyalgia

    Carmen M. Galvez-Sánchez;Casandra I. Montoro;Stefan Duschek;Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso

  • Interoceptive awareness moderates neural activity during decision-making.

    Natalie S. Werner;Nicola Schweitzer;Thomas Meindl;Stefan Duschek

  • Differential effects of alexithymia subscales on autonomic reactivity and anxiety during social stress.

    Olga Pollatos;Natalie S. Werner;Stefan Duschek;Stefan Duschek;Rainer Schandry

  • Essential hypotension is accompanied by deficits in attention and working memory.

    Stefan Duschek;Ellen Matthias;Rainer Schandry

  • Implicit memory for emotional words is modulated by cardiac perception.

    Natalie S. Werner;Isabella Peres;Stefan Duschek;Rainer Schandry

  • Relationship between baroreceptor cardiac reflex sensitivity and pain experience in normotensive individuals.

    S. Duschek;I. Mück;G.A. Reyes del Paso

  • Increased sensitivity to heat pain in chronic low blood pressure.

    Stefan Duschek;Anja Dietel;Rainer Schandry;Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso

Frequent Co-Authors

Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso
Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso University of Jaén
Rainer Schandry
Rainer Schandry Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Stefan Sütterlin
Stefan Sütterlin Østfold University College
Nathan Weisz
Nathan Weisz University of Salzburg
Pedro Montoya
Pedro Montoya University of the Balearic Islands
Arthur M. Jacobs
Arthur M. Jacobs Freie Universität Berlin
Simone Grimm
Simone Grimm University of Zurich
Olga Pollatos
Olga Pollatos University of Ulm
Beate M. Herbert
Beate M. Herbert University of Tübingen
Erich Seifritz
Erich Seifritz University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and rewarding career options. Many students start with flexible online programs before specializing in counseling, clinical psychology, or related fields.

If you’re interested specifically in counseling, it’s important to compare programs by region and specialty. Explore the best counseling degree programs in the Midwest if you live in or plan to work in that area. You can also look deeper into state-specific opportunities, such as the best counseling program rankings in Minnesota or Mississippi counseling degree programs.

For those considering a vibrant urban environment to launch their career, the best counseling program rankings in Nashville provide valuable insights into local educational pathways.

With the growth of telehealth and online therapy, earning a psychology or counseling degree online has never been more relevant. Graduates can pursue roles in mental health services, school counseling, research, or even private practice—helping meet the increasing demand for qualified professionals across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Duschek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles